Published June 10, 2026
| Version v1
Figure
Open
Figure 22 from: Will KW, Kanda K, Wild AL, Schmidt J, Moore W, Miller KB, Gómez RA, Maddison DR (2026) Phylogenetic analysis of Adephaga (Coleoptera) with extensive taxon sampling reveals unexpected relationships within the hyperdiverse beetle subfamily Harpalinae (Carabidae). Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift 73(1): 193-254. https://doi.org/10.3897/dez.73.189689
Authors/Creators
- 1. University of California, Berkeley, United States of America
- 2. Unaffiliated, Virginia, United States of America
- 3. Department of Integrative Biology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, United States of America
- 4. General and Systematic Zoology, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
- 5. Department of Entomology, University of Arizona, Tucson, United States of America
- 6. Department of Biology and Museum of Southwestern Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, United States of America
- 7. Center for Reproductive Evolution, Biology Department, Syracuse University, Syracuse, United States of America
- 8. Department of Integrative Biology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, United States of America
Description
Figure 22 Proposed classification of Geadephaga. Footnotes: [1] Laccocenus and Psydrus + Nomius are paraphyletic in our analysis. [2] Gehringia is placed with Cymbionotum rendering a Melaeniini (as Cymbionotum + Melaenus) paraphyletic. [3] Pseudozaena and Sphaerostylus are weakly supported as sister to Paussini. [4] Stereostoma and Morionidius are excluded from Morionini and placed with strong support with Chaetodactylini. [5] Sampling of zuphiines was limited to five species, chosen to represent three of the four subtribes (the Canaria Island endemic Dicrodontina not included). The five included are a small sample of the more than 20 genera currently recognized which have a worldwide distribution and include a significant amount of morphological diversity. Given this uncertainty we continue to recognize this assemblage as a tribe. [6] Agonica and Pseudagonica are excluded from Peleciini and placed in Pterostichini with very strong support. [7] A strongly supported Chaetodactylini is newly constituted to include (among others) Stereostoma, Microcheila, Chaetodactyla, Morionidius. [8] Drimostomatini excludes Trichillinus, Barylaus, and Cyrtolaus, which are moved to Ctenodactylini. [9] Perigonini includes Dirotus. [10] The oodine Systolocranius is placed as sister to Tefflus in what is otherwise a clade of panagaeines. This relationship is not well supported. [11] Our concept of Oodini excludes dercylines and chaetogenyines, both previously thought to be related to oodines. Other taxa often associated with oodines (Geobaenus, Melanchrous, Melanchitonini) are excluded as they are not placed in the panagaeite clade. [12] Recognition of Zabrini and Ctenodactylini, and the placement of euchroines with sphodrines, renders Pterostichini paraphyletic. Appropriate ranking of the included clades awaits denser sampling and may require recognizing some clades as tribes. [13] Ctenodactylini includes taxa previously treated as drimostomatines, hexagonines, and ctenodactylines. [14] Lachnophorini forms a grade in our analyses. [15] Lebiini includes taxa formerly in Cyclosomini.
Files
big_1675632.jpg
Files
(308.8 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:251bf9d076cd68d11154c21b6ce09bcf
|
308.8 kB | Preview Download |
Linked records
Additional details
Related works
- Is part of
- Journal article: 10.3897/dez.73.189689 (DOI)
- Journal article: https://zenodo.org/record/20659751 (URL)