Biodiversity Literature Repository

Submit to community
Liberated Data
Published April 28, 2020 | Version v1
Journal article Restricted

Landscape genetics of wolverines (Gulo gulo): scale-dependent effects of bioclimatic, topographic, and anthropogenic variables

Description

Balkenhol, Niko, Schwartz, Michael K, Inman, Robert M, Copeland, Jeffrey P, Squires, John S, Anderson, Neil J, Waits, Lisette P (2020): Landscape genetics of wolverines (Gulo gulo): scale-dependent effects of bioclimatic, topographic, and anthropogenic variables. Journal of Mammalogy 101 (3): 790-803, DOI: 10.1093/jmammal/gyaa037, URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/gyaa037

Files

Restricted

The record is publicly accessible, but files are restricted. Log in to check if you have access.

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:FFDB7B3FFFA0FFA5FFE7FF85CB1BFFF9

Related works

Has part
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.20658058 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.20658060 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.20658062 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.20658064 (DOI)

References

  • ABRAHMS, B., S. C. SAWYER, N. R. JORDAN, J. W. MCNUTT, A. M. WILSON, AND J. BRASHARES. 2017. Does wildlife resource selection accurately inform corridor conservation? Journal of Applied Ecology 54:412-422.
  • ADRIAENSEN, F., ET AL. 2003. The application of 'least-cost' modelling as a functional landscape model. Landscape and Urban Planning 64:233-247.
  • ARONSSON, M., AND J. PERSSON. 2018. Female breeding dispersal in wolverines, a solitary carnivore with high territorial fidelity. European Journal of Wildlife Research 64:7
  • AUBRY, K. B., K. S. MCKELVEY, AND J. P. COPELAND 2007. Distribution and broadscale habitat relations of the wolverine in the contiguous United States. Journal of Wildlife Management 71:2147-2158.
  • AVON, C., AND L. BERGES. 2016. Prioritization of habitat patches for landscape connectivity conservation differs between least-cost and resistance distances. Landscape Ecology 31:1551-1565.
  • BALKENHOL, N., L. P. WAITS, AND R. DEZZANI. 2009. Statistical approaches in landscape genetics: an evaluation of methods for linking landscape and genetic data. Ecography 32:818-830.
  • BANCI, V. 1994. Wolverine. Pp. 99-127 in The scientific basis for conserving forest carnivores: American marten, fisher, lynx, and wolverine in the western United States (L. F. Ruggiero, K. B. Aubry, S. W. Buskirk, L. J. Lyon, and W. J. Zielinski, eds.). USDA Forest Service General Technical Report, RM-254. Fort Collins, Colorado.
  • BARRETT,A. P. 2003. National Operational Hydrologic Remote Sensing Center Snow Data Assimilation System (SNODAS). National Snow and Ice Data Center Special Report 11. Boulder, CO.
  • BARTOn, K. A., T. ZWIJACZ-KOZICA, F. ZIeBA, A. SERGIEL, AND N. SELVA. 2019. Bears without borders: long-distance movement in human-dominated landscapes. Global Ecology and Conservation 17:e00541.
  • BISCHOF, R., E. R. GREGERSEN, H. BROSETH, H. ELLEGREN, AND O. FLAGSTAD. 2016. Noninvasive genetic sampling reveals intrasex territoriality in wolverines. Ecology and Evolution 6:1527-1536.
  • BORCARD, D., P. LEGENDRE, AND P. DRAPEAU. 1992. Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation. Ecology 73:1045-1055.
  • BROCK, B. L., ET AL. 2007. Broad-scale wolverine habitat in the conterminous Rocky Mountain states. Pp. 21-53 in Greater Yellowstone Wolverine Program. Cumulative Report May 2007 (R. M. Inman, M. L. Packila, K. H. Inman, R. S. Spence, and D. McCauley, eds.). Wildlife Conservation Society, North America Program. Ennis, Montana.
  • BROCK, B. L., AND R. M. INMAN. 2006. Use of latitude-adjusted elevation in broad-scale species distribution models. Intermountain Journal of Sciences 12:12-17.
  • BROQUET, T., AND E. J. PETIT. 2009. Molecular estimation of dispersal for ecology and population genetics. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 40:193-216.
  • CARROLL, C., R. F. NOSS, AND P. C. PAQUET. 2001. Carnivores as focal species for conservation planning in the Rocky Mountain region. Ecological Applications 11:961-980.
  • CARROLL, C., D. J. ROHLF,Y.-W. LI,. B. HARTL, M. K. PHILLIPS, AND R. F. NOSS. 2015. Connectivity conservation and endangered species recovery: a study in the challenges of defining conservationreliant species. Conservation Letters 8:132-138.
  • CAYUELA, H., ET AL. 2018. Demographic and genetic approaches to study dispersal in wild animal populations: a methodological review. Molecular Ecology 27:3976-4010.
  • CEGELSKI, C. C., L. P. WAITS, AND N. J. ANDERSON. 2003. Assessing population structure and gene flow in Montana wolverines (Gulo gulo) using assignment-based approaches. Molecular Ecology 12:2907-2918.
  • CEGELSKI, C. C., L. WAITS, N. J. ANDERSON, O. FLAGSTAD, C. STROBECK, AND C. J. KYLE. 2006. Genetic diversity and population structure of wolverine (Gulo gulo) populations at the southern edge of their current distribution in North America with implications for genetic viability. Conservation Genetics 7:197-211.
  • CHEVAN, A., AND M. SUTHERLAND. 1991. Hierarchical partitioning. The American Statistician 45:90-96.
  • CLOBERT, J., M. BAGUETTE, T. G. BENTON, AND J. M. BULLOCK (EDS.). 2012. Dispersal ecology and evolution. Oxford University Press. Oxford, United Kingdom.
  • COPELAND, J. P. 1996. Biology of the wolverine in central Idaho. M.S. thesis, University of Idaho. Moscow.
  • COPELAND, J. P., ET AL. 2007. Seasonal habitat associations of the wolverine in Central Idaho. Journal of Wildlife Management. 71:2201-2212.
  • COPELAND, J. P., ET AL. 2010. The bioclimatic envelope of the wolverine: do environmental constraints limit their geographic distribution? Canadian Journal of Zoology 88:233-246.
  • CUSHMAN, S. A., K. S. MCKELVEY, J. HAYDEN, AND M. K. SCHWARTZ. 2006. Gene flow in complex landscapes: testing multiple hypotheses with causal modeling. The American Naturalist 168:486-499.
  • CUSHMAN, S. A., A. J. SHIRK, AND E. L. LANDGUTH. 2013b. Landscape genetics and limiting factors. Conservation Genetics 14:263-274.
  • CUSHMAN, S. A., T. N. WASSERMAN, E. L. LANDGUTH, AND A. J. SHIRK. 2013a. Re-evaluating causal modeling with Mantel tests in landscape genetics. Diversity 5:51-72.
  • DALERUM, F., J. LOXTERMAN, B. SHULTS, K. KUNKEL, AND J. A. COOK. 2007. Sex-specific dispersal patterns of wolverines: insights from microsatellite markers. Journal of Mammalogy 88:793-800.
  • DORMANN, C. F., ET AL. 2013. Collinearity: a review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography 36:27-46.
  • EDELMANN, F. B., AND J. P. COPELAND. 1999. Wolverine distributions in the northwestern United States and a survey in the Seven Devils mountains of Idaho. Northwest Science 73:295-300.
  • FISHER, J. T., ET AL. 2013. Wolverines (Gulo gulo luscus) on the Rocky Mountain slopes: natural heterogeneity and landscape alteration as predictors of distribution. Canadian Journal of Zoology 91:706-716.
  • FLAGSTAD, O., ET AL. 2004. Colonization history and noninvasive monitoring of a reestablished wolverine population. Conservation Biology 18:676-688.
  • FORTUNE, L., J. P. PRUNIER, I. PAZ-VINAS, G. LOOT, C. VEYSSIERE, AND S. BLANCHET. 2018. Inferring causalities in landscape genetics: an extension of Wright's causal modeling to distance matrices. The American Naturalist 191:491-508.
  • FRANCKOWIAK, R. P., ET AL. 2017. Model selection with multiple regression on distance matrices leads to incorrect inferences. PLoS ONE 12:e0175194.
  • GARDNER, C. L., W. B. BALLARD, AND R. H. JESSUP. 1986. Long distance movement by an adult wolverine. Journal of Mammalogy 67:603.
  • GOSLEE, S. C., AND D. L. URBAN. 2007. The ecodist package for dissimilarity-based analysis of ecological data. Journal of Statistical Software 22:7
  • GUILLOT, G., A. ESTOUP, F. MORTIER, AND J. F. COSSON. 2005. A spatial statistical model for landscape genetics. Genetics 170:1261-1280.
  • HARDY, O. J., AND X. VEKEMANS. 2002. Spagedi: a versatile computer program to analyse spatial genetic structure at the individual or population levels. Molecular Ecology Notes 2:618-620.
  • HEDMARK, E., J. PERSSON, P. SEGESTROEM, A. LANDA, AND H. ELLEGREN. 2007. Paternity and mating system in wolverines Gulo gulo. Wildlife Biology 13:13-30.
  • HEIM, N., J. T. FISHER, A. CLEVENGER, J. PACZKOWSKI, AND J. VOLPE. 2017. Cumulative effects of climate and landscape change drive spatial distribution of Rocky Mountain wolverine (Gulo gulo L.). Ecology and Evolution 7:8903-8914.
  • HEINZ, S. K., C. WISSEL, AND K. FRANK. 2006. The viability of metapopulations: individual dispersal behaviour matters. Landscape Ecology 21:77-89.
  • HOMER, C., C. HUANG, L. LANG, B. WYLIE, AND M. COAN. 2001. Development of a 2001 national land-cover database for the United States.Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 70:829-840.
  • HORNOCKER, M. G., AND H. S. HASH. 1981. Ecology of the wolverine in northwestern Montana. Canadian Journal of Zoology 59:1286-1301.
  • INMAN, R. M., ET AL. 2012a. Spatial ecology of wolverines at the southern periphery of distribution. Journal of Wildlife Management 76:778-792.
  • INMAN, R. M., ET AL. 2013. Developing priorities for metapopulation conservation at the landscape scale: wolverines in the western United States. Biological Conservation 166:276-286.
  • INMAN, R. M., A. J. MAGOUN, J. PERSSON, AND J. MATTISSON. 2012b. The wolverine's niche: linking reproductive chronology, caching, competition, and climate. Journal of Mammalogy 93:634-644.
  • JENKINS, D. G., ET AL. 2010.A meta-analysis of isolation by distance: relic or reference standard for landscape genetics? Ecography 33:315-320.
  • KEELEY, A. T. H., P. BEIER, AND J. W. GAGNON. 2016. Estimating landscape resistance from habitat suitability: effects of data source and nonlinearities. Landscape Ecology 31:2151-2162.
  • KORTELLO, A., D. HAUSLEITNER, AND G. MOWAT. 2019. Mechanisms influencing the winter distribution of wolverine Gulo gulo luscus in the southern Columbia Mountains, Canada. Wildlife Biology 2019:wlb.00480.
  • KRISTENSEN, T. V., ET AL. 2018. Spatial genetic structure in American black bears (Ursus americanus): female philopatry is variable and related to population history. Heredity 120:329-341.
  • KYLE, C. J., AND C. STROBECK. 2001. Genetic structure of North American wolverine (Gulo gulo) populations. Molecular Ecology 10:337-347.
  • KYLE, C. J., AND C. STROBECK. 2002. Connectivity of peripheral and core populations of North American wolverines. Journal of Mammalogy 83:1141-1150.
  • LEGENDRE, P. 2000. Comparison of permutation methods for the partial correlations and partial Mantel tests. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 67:37-73.
  • LICHSTEIN, J. W. 2007. Multiple regression on distance matrices: a multivariate spatial analysis tool. Plant Ecology 188:117-131.
  • MAC NALLY, R. 2000. Regression and model-building in conservation biology, biogeography and ecology: the distinction between - and reconciliation of - 'predictive' and 'explanatory' models. Biodiversity and Conservation 9:655-671.
  • MAC NALLY, R. 2009. Hierarchical partitioning as an interpretative tool in multivariate inference. Austral Ecology 21:224-228.
  • MAGOUN, A. J., AND J. P. COPELAND. 1998. Characteristics of wolverine reproductive den sites. Journal of Wildlife Management 62:1313-1320.
  • MANTEL, N. 1967. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Research 27:209-220.
  • MARROTTE, R. R., AND J. BOWMAN. 2017. The relationship between least-cost and resistance distance. PLoS ONE 12:e0174212.
  • MATEO-SANCHEZ, M., N. BALKENHOL, S. A. CUSHMAN, T. PEREZ, P. DOMINGUEZ, AND S. SAURA. 2015. A comparative framework to infer landscape effects on population genetic structure: are habitat suitability models effective in explaining gene flow? Landscape Ecology 8:1405-1420.
  • MAY, R., A. LANDA, J. VAN DIJK J. D. C. LINNELL, AND R. ANDERSEN. 2006. Impact of infrastructure on habitat selection of wolverines Gulo gulo. Wildlife Biology 12:285-295.
  • MCCLURE, M. L., A. J. HANSEN, AND R. M. INMAN. 2016. Connecting models to movements: testing connectivity model predictions against empirical migration and dispersal. Landscape Ecology 31:1419-1432.
  • MCKELVEY, K. S., ET AL. 2011. Climate change predicted to shift wolverine distributions, connectivity, and dispersal corridors. Ecological Applications 21:2882-2897.
  • MCKELVEY, K. S., ET AL. 2014. Recovery of wolverines in the western United States: recent extirpation and recolonization or range retraction and expansion.The Journal of Wildlife Management 78:325-334.
  • MCRAE, B. H. 2006. Isolation by resistance. Evolution 60:1551-1561.
  • MCRAE, B. H., AND P. BEIER. 2007. Circuit theory predicts gene flow in plant and animal populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104:19885-19890.
  • MCRAE, B. H., AND V. B. SHAH. 2013. Circuitscape 3.4 user guide. The Nature Conservancy. Arlington, Virginia.
  • MILLER, M. P. 2005. Alleles in space: computer software for the joint analysis of interindividual spatial and genetic information. Journal of Heredity 96:722-724.
  • MORIARTY, K. M., ET AL. 2009. Wolverine confirmation in California after nearly a century: native or long-distance immigrant? Northwest Science 83:154-162.
  • MORTON, E. R., ET AL. 2018. Dispersal: a matter of scale. Ecology 99:938-946.
  • MURRAY, K., AND M. M. CONNER. 2009. Methods to quantify variable importance: implications for the analysis of noisy ecological data. Ecology 90:348-355.
  • NEI, M., F. TAJIMA, AND Y. TATENO. 1983. Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data. II. Gene frequency data. Journal of Molecular Evolution 19:153-170.
  • OREGON WILD. 2019. Oregon's lonely wolverine. https://oregonwild. org/about/blog/oregons-lonely-wolverine. Accessed 9 March 2020.
  • PACKILA, M. L., M. D. RILEY, R. S. SPENCE, AND R. M. INMAN. 2017. Long-distance wolverine dispersal from Wyoming to historic range in Colorado. Northwest Science 91:399-407.
  • PEAKALL, R., AND P. E. SMOUSE. 2005. GenAlEx 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Molecular Ecology Notes 6:288-295.
  • PERSSON, J., P. WEDHOLM, AND P. SEGERSTROM. 2010. Space-use and territoriality of wolverines (Gulo gulo) in northern Scandinavia. European Journal of Wildlife Research 56:49-57.
  • PRUNIER, J. G., M. COLYN, X. LEGENDRE, AND M.-C. FLAMAND. 2017. Regression commonality analyses on hierarchical genetic distances. Ecography 40:1412-1425.
  • PRUNIER, J. G., M. COLYN, X. LEGENDRE, K. F. NIMON, AND M. C. FLAMAND. 2015. Multicollinearity in spatial genetics: separating the wheat from the chaff using commonality analyses. Molecular Ecology 24:263-283.
  • RADELOFF, V. C., R. B. HAMMER, S. I. STEWART, J. S. FRIED, S. S. HOLCOMB, AND J. F. MCKEEFRY. 2005. The wildland urban interface in the United States. Ecological Applications 15:799-805.
  • RAY, N. 2005. PATHMATRIX: a GIS tool to compute effective distances among samples. Molecular Ecology Notes 5:177-180.
  • RILEY, S. J., S. D. DEGLORIA, AND R. ELLIOT. 1999. A terrain ruggedness index that quantifies topographic heterogeneity. Intermountain Journal of Sciences 5:23-27.
  • ROBERTSON, E. P., ET AL. 2018. Isolating the roles of movement and reproduction on effective connectivity alters conservation priorities for an endangered bird. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 115:8591-8596.
  • ROFFLER, G. H., ET AL. 2016. Identification of landscape features influencing gene flow: how useful are habitat selection models? Evolutionary Applications 9:805-817.
  • ROUSSET, F. 2000. Genetic differentiation between individuals. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 13:58-62.
  • ROWLAND, M. M., M. J. WISDOM, D. H. JOHNSON, B. C. WALES, J. P. COPELAND, AND F. B. EDELMANN. 2003. Evaluation of landscape models for wolverines in the interior Northwest, United States of America. Journal of Mammalogy 84:92-105.
  • SAWAYA, M. A., A. P. CLEVENGER, AND M. K. SCHWARTZ. 2019. Demographic fragmentation of a protected wolverine population bisected by a major transportation corridor. Biological Conservation 236:16-625.
  • SHIRK, A. J., E. L. LANDGUTH, AND S. A. CUSHMAN. 2017. A comparison of individual-based genetic distance metrics for landscape genetics. Molecular Ecology Resources 17:1308-1317.
  • SHIRK, A. J., E. L. LANDGUTH, AND S. A. CUSHMAN. 2018. A comparison of regression methods for model selection in individual-based landscape genetic analysis. Molecular Ecology Resources 18:55-67.
  • SCHWARTZ, M. K., ET AL. 2007. Inferring geographic isolation of wolverines in California using historical DNA. Journal of Wildlife Management 71:2170-2179.
  • SCHWARTZ, M. K., ET AL. 2009. Wolverine gene flow across a narrow climatic niche. Ecology 90:3222-3232.
  • SHIRK, A. J., D. O. WALLIN, S. A. CUSHMAN, C. G. RICE, AND K. I. WARHEIT. 2010. Inferring landscape effects on gene flow: a new model selection framework. Molecular Ecology 19:3603-3619.
  • SINGLETON, P. H., W. L. GAINES, AND J. F. LEHMKUHL 2002. Landscape permeability for large carnivores in Washington: a Geographic Information System weighted-distance and least-cost corridor assessment. USDA Research Paper PNW-RP-549. Pacific Northwest Research Station. Portland, Oregon.
  • SMOUSE, P. E., J. C. LONG, AND R. R. SOKAL. 1986. Multiple regression and correlation extensions of the Mantel test of matrix correspondence. Systematic Zoology 35:627-632.
  • SMOUSE, P. E., AND R. PEAKALL. 1999. Spatial autocorrelation analysis of individual multiallele and multilocus genetic structure. Heredity 82:561-573.
  • SPEAR, S. F., N. BALKENHOL, M. J. FORTIN, B. H. MCRAE, AND K. SCRIBNER. 2010. Use of resistance surfaces for landscape genetic studies: considerations for parameterization and analysis. Molecular Ecology 19:3576-3591.
  • SPEAR, S. F., S. A. CUSHMAN, AND B. H. MCRAE. 2016. Resistance surface modeling in landscape genetics. Pp. 129-148 in Landscape genetics: concepts, methods, applications (N. Balkenhol, S. A. Cushman, A. Storfer, and L. Waits, eds.). Wiley-Blackwell. Oxford, United Kingdom.
  • SQUIRES, J. R., D. H. PLETCHER, T. J. ULIZIO, AND L. F. RUGGIERO. 2006. The association between landscape features and transportation corridors on movements and habitat-use patterns of wolverines. Final Report, MDT Project #8171. Montana Department of Transportation. Helena.
  • STEWART, F. E., N. A. HEIM, A. P. CLEVENGER, J. PACZKOWSKI, J. P. VOLPE, AND J. T. FISHER. 2016. Wolverine behavior varies spatially with anthropogenic footprint: implications for conservation and inferences about declines. Ecology and Evolution 6:1493-1503.
  • STORFER, A., ET AL. 2007. Putting the "landscape" in landscape genetics. Heredity 98:128-142.
  • STURGES, H. 1926. The choice of a class-interval. Journal of the American Statistical Association 21:65-66.
  • SUTHERLAND, G. D., A. S. HARESTAD, K. PRICE, AND K. P. LERTZMAN. 2000. Scaling of natal dispersal distances in terrestrial birds and mammals. Conservation Ecology 4:16.
  • TRAKHTENBROT, A., R. NATHAN, G. PERRY, AND D. M. RICHARDSON. 2005. The importance of long-distance dispersal in biodiversity conservation. Diversity and Distributions 11:173-181.
  • TRAVIS, J. M. J., ET AL. 2013. Dispersal and species' responses to climate change. Oikos 122:1532-1540.
  • VANGEN, K. M., J. PERSSON, A. LANDA, R. ANDERSEN, AND P. SEGERSTROM. 2001. Characteristics of dispersal in wolverines. Canadian Journal of Zoology 79:1641-1649.
  • WAGNER, H. H. 2004. Direct multiscale ordination with canonical correspondence analysis. Ecology 85:342-351.
  • WAGNER, H. H., AND M.-J. FORTIN. 2005. Spatial analysis of landscapes: concepts and statistics. Ecology 86:1975-1987.
  • WAGNER, H. H., AND M.-J. FORTIN. 2016. Basics of spatial data analysis: linking landscape and genetic data for landscape genetic studies. Pp. 77-98 in Landscape genetics: concepts, methods, applications (N. Balkenhol, S. A. Cushman, A. Storfer, and L. Waits, eds.). Wiley-Blackwell. Oxford, United Kingdom.
  • WAITS, L. P., S. A. CUSHMAN, AND S. F. SPEAR. 2016. Applications of landscape genetics to connectivity research in terrestrial animals. Pp. 199-219 in Landscape genetics: concepts, methods, applications (N. Balkenhol, S. A. Cushman, A. Storfer, and L. Waits, eds.). Wiley-Blackwell. Oxford, United Kingdom.
  • WALSH, C., AND R. MAC NALLY. 2009. The hier.part package for R. http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/hier.part/index.html. Accessed 9 March 2020.
  • WALTON, Z., ET AL. 2018. Long-distance dispersal in red foxes Vulpes vulpes revealed by GPS tracking. European Journal of Wildlife Research 64:64.
  • WANG, I. J. 2013. Examining the full effects of landscape heterogeneity on spatial genetic variation: a multiple matrix regression approach for quantifying geographic and ecological isolation. Evolution 67:3403-3411.
  • WANG, G., W. LIU, Y. WANG, X. WAN, AND W. ZHONG. 2017. Restricted dispersal determines fine-scale spatial genetic structure of Mongolian gerbils. Current Zoology 63:687-691.
  • WANG, Y.-H., K.-C. YANG, C. L. GRIDGMAN, AND L.-K. LIN. 2008. Habitat suitability modelling to correlate gene flow with landscape connectivity. Landscape Ecology 23:989-1000.
  • WASSERMAN, T. N., S. A. CUSHMAN, M. K. SCHWARTZ, AND D. O. WALLIN. 2010. Spatial scaling and multi-model inference in landscape genetics: Martes americana in northern Idaho. Landscape Ecology 25:1601-1612.
  • WEBB, S. M., ET AL. 2016. Distribution of female wolverines relative to snow cover, Alberta, Canada. The Journal of Wildlife Management 80:1461-1470.
  • WHITMEE, S., AND C. D. L. ORME. 2013. Predicting dispersal distance in mammals:atrait-basedapproach.JournalofAnimalEcology 82:211-221.
  • WILSON, G. M., R. A. VAN DEN BUSSCHE, P. K. KENNEDY, A. GUNN, AND K. POOLE. 2000. Genetic variability of wolverines (Gulo gulo) from the Northwest Territories, Canada: conservation implications. Journal of Mammalogy 81:186-196.
  • WRIGHT, S. 1943. Isolation by distance. Genetics 28:114-138.
  • ZELLER, K. A., K. MCGARIGAL, AND A. R. WHITELEY. 2012. Estimating landscape resistance to movement: a review. Landscape Ecology 27:777-797.