Solar-type eclipsing binaries as benchmark stars
Description
Detached eclipsing binaries (DEBs), especially double-lined systems (SB2 DEBs), are becoming recognised as high-quality benchmarks for stellar astrophysics thanks to recent improvements in the precision of their measured model-independent masses and radii. This is thanks to high-quality space-based photometry (e.g. TESS, Kepler, CHEOPS) and radial velocity measurements from stable high-resolution échelle spectra, which now make it common to reach <0.2% precision in these properties. DEBs can therefore provide extremely rigorous benchmarking constraints for a wide range of applications, e.g. calibrating stellar evolution models, testing asteroseismic scaling relations, and validating machine-learning pipelines such as those used in exoplanet host star characterisation (e.g. PLATO, 4MOST). However, effective temperature (Teff) remains a persistent limitation on the usefulness of DEBs as benchmarks, due to large systematic uncertainties and inconsistent methodologies throughout the literature. I will present results from our ongoing work to address this issue: we use a novel method to measure fundamental Teff for stars in DEBs by measuring bolometric flux contributions from multi-band light curves, and angular diameter from stellar radii and parallax. I will highlight interesting examples from our growing sample of well-characterised FGK-type DEBs, and discuss future extensions to the method and its applications.
Files
CS23-poster-NJM.pdf
Files
(1.3 MB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:aa3f1479db50ad85d4e7cfdafb404f9f
|
1.3 MB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Dates
- Submitted
-
2026-06-08
References
- Southworth, J. (2015), Living Together: Planets, Host Stars and Binaries, 496, 164. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1411.1219
- Miller, N. J., Maxted, P. F. L., & Smalley, B. (2020), MNRAS, 497, 3, 2899. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa2167
- Maxted, P. F. L., et al. (2022), MNRAS, 513, 4, 6042. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac1270
- Miller, N. J., et al. (2022), MNRAS, 517, 4, 5129. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac2968
- Maxted, P. F. L. (2023), MNRAS, 522, 2, 2683. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad1112
- Maxted, P. F. L., et al. (2024), MNRAS, 531, 4, 4577. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae1434
- Graczyk, D., et al. (2025), A&A, 694, A65. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202452065
- Maxted, P. F. L., et al. (2025), MNRAS, 544, 4, 4611. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staf1856
- Miller, N. J., et al. (2026), MNRAS, 545, 3, staf2078. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staf2078
- Adshead, N. J., Maxted, P. F. L., & Hahlin, A. (2026), MNRAS, 548, 3, stag723. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stag723
- Soubiran, C., et al. (2024), A&A, 682, A145. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202347136
- Dotter, A., et al. (2008), ApJS, 178, 1, 89. https://doi.org/10.1086/589654