Published June 7, 2026 | Version v1
Preprint Open

Seismic Energy Release Risk Assessment (SERRA) — A Physical Energy-Based Framework for Seismic Behavior Characterization, Reactivation Stage Identification, and Seismic Risk Mapping

  • 1. THEK Research Institute | Universidad de Guayaquil

Description

THEK Research Institute — Advanced Scientific, Engineering & Technological Think Tank

Marcelo Moncayo Theurer, MSc  |  CEO & Director of Research  |  Full Professor, Universidad de Guayaquil

The Seismic Energy Release Risk Assessment (SERRA) — known in Spanish as Método de Energía Liberada (MEL) — is an original seismic hazard framework developed at the University of Tokyo between 1999 and 2000 under the supervision of Professor Kenichi Ohi, and first presented at the 6th International Conference on Seismic Zonation (Oakland, USA, 2000).

SERRA performs an inverse transformation of historical seismic catalogs from Richter magnitude space into physical energy space using the Guttenberg-Richter relation (1956), recovering information about tectonic energy accumulation and release systematically obscured by the logarithmic compression of the magnitude scale. Unlike traditional probabilistic seismic hazard methods, SERRA is intimately linked to the actual seismic behavior of the analyzed region.

Three Analytical Tools

  1. Seismic energy release curves (energy vs. time at lustro and decadal resolution) — identify reactivation stages, energy levels, recurrence patterns, and enable seismic risk map construction at national, regional, and canton scales.
  2. Hypocentral depth curves (superficial / intermediate / deep earthquakes vs. time) — demonstrate that hypocenters migrate toward the surface during reactivation and deepen during quiescence. High energy + superficial hypocenters = most structurally destructive condition.
  3. GIS-based focused energy maps (ArcMap / Global Mapper) — classify seismogenic sources by Maximum Expected Magnitude (MEM) and peak ground acceleration (PGA).

Empirical Validations

  • 2001: Predicted onset of a new Ecuadorian seismic reactivation from year 2000 — validated by tens-fold post-2000 energy increase. Premio al Mérito Científico, Honorable Congreso Nacional del Ecuador.
  • 2003–2005: ESPOL Proyecto Semilla map identified Manabi-Esmeraldas as Very High threat (Mw 7.7–8.0) — validated by the April 16, 2016 Pedernales earthquake (Mw 7.8).
  • October 2015: International Congress (UCSG) reiterated the threat five months before the event. Published in Revista Alternativas (2016). DOI: 10.23878/alternativas.v17i3.231

Key Findings — Multi-Country Application

  • Applied to Ecuador, Mexico, Chile, Venezuela, Colombia, Peru, Japan, Australia, USA, Europe, and at continental scale.
  • North-South distinction: Seismicity in Peru and Chile is governed by subduction proximity; in Ecuador, Colombia, and Venezuela by discrete seismogenic spots — requiring fundamentally different hazard approaches.
  • First energy-based seismic risk map for Latin America (Pinargote Peralta & Vera Tumbaco, 2019, Universidad de Guayaquil, under direction of Moncayo Theurer).
  • Polynomial energy behavior equations derived for six countries — enabling quantitative projection of future seismic behavior.
  • 30-canton Ecuador study (2022): All 30 cantons in active reactivation. Guayaquil: 27-year uninterrupted reactivation at 6.76× historical average — longest in 122 years of instrumental records.
  • Caribbean plate vestige proposal: Anomalous material between the Nazca and South American plates expressed through the Guayaquil-Caracas fault system explains the seismogenic spot behavior of the northern Andean margin.

Files included: English white paper (primary) | Spanish white paper — Método de Energía Liberada | Newspaper clipping, Diario El Universo, October 2001 (priority date evidence)

Priority date of public disclosure: October 2001 — Diario El Universo, Guayaquil, Ecuador.

Files

3ER RECORTE DEL PERIODICO DE OCTUBRE DEL 2001 EN EL DIARIO EL UNINVERSO DONDE MARCELO INDICA QUE MANABI ES PROPENSA A SISMOS.jpg

Additional details

Funding

Dutch Research Council
6GVisible 10743/31/2022

Dates

Available
2026-06-06

Software

Development Status
Active

References

  • Guttenberg & Richter (1956). BSSA 46(2), 105-145.
  • Moncayo Theurer (2000). 6th Int'l Conf. Seismic Zonation, Oakland.
  • Moncayo Theurer (2005). Mapa de Potencialidad ESPOL, Guayaquil.
  • Moncayo Theurer (2016). Revista Alternativas 17(3). DOI: 10.23878/alternativas.v17i3.231
  • Castilla & Sanchez (2014). Boletin CIOH 32, 135-147.
  • Pinargote & Vera (2019). Tesis U. Guayaquil.
  • Intriago & Villavicencio (2022). Tesis U. Guayaquil.
  • Akiyama (1985). Earthquake-Resistant Limit-State Design. U. Tokyo Press.