Published June 6, 2026 | Version v5
Preprint Open

Hic Sunt Dracones: A Formal Framework for Epistemic Frontier Mapping, Unknown Unknown Detection, and Knowledge Boundary Quantification in Individual Cognitive Universes

Authors/Creators

Description

All prior systems for mapping individual cognitive knowledge have focused exclusively on representing what is known. None has provided a formal mathematical framework for mapping the boundary between known and unknown knowledge, detecting unknown unknowns through comparison with collective knowledge architectures, or quantifying the rate at which the frontier of individual knowledge expands over time. This paper proposes such a framework.

We introduce a three-zone epistemic architecture partitioning the individual cognitive universe into Zone 1 (Terra Cognita: known knowns), Zone 2 (Terra Incognita: known unknowns), and Zone 3 (Hic Sunt Dracones: unknown unknowns). We formalize zone boundaries using k-nearest neighbor distance computation in both Euclidean and Manhattan metrics, topological boundary theory in metric spaces, Shannon entropy gradients, and Kolmogorov complexity. We propose a collective universe comparison mechanism that makes Zone 3 visible to the individual from the outside through federated and privacy-preserving methods. We describe a frontier expansion rate metric that tracks the rate at which unknown unknowns become known unknowns over time.

The framework operationalizes the philosophical tradition of negative epistemology, from Wittgenstein's proposition that whereof one cannot speak thereof one must be silent, through Popper's falsifiability criterion as a frontier marker, to Taleb's Black Swan theory of unknown unknowns as structural events that reshape knowledge architectures. The cartographic phrase Hic Sunt Dracones, here there be dragons, is adopted as a formal technical designation for Zone 3, recovering the epistemically honest acknowledgment encoded in early modern cartography that the boundary of the known world is not nothing but uncharted.

The framework is implemented as part of the Cognitive Universe System (CUS), an AI-powered architecture for mapping individual and collective knowledge universes whose governance and sovereignty dimensions are addressed in a companion working paper. This is a working paper presenting a conceptual synthesis and an architectural blueprint rather than a field-tested empirical result; its contribution lies in the synthesis itself, the systematized use of density and distance metrics to construct an outward-facing map of individual ignorance, rather than in the underlying mathematical primitives, which are individually well established.

Notes

Version 5 supersedes v4 (DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20551731) and revises the mathematical framework of Section III for internal consistency and formal well-posedness, leaving the paper's contributions, structure, and conclusions unchanged. Section 3.7 has been substantially rewritten: the earlier account modeled the hardening of an edge from probabilistic to determinate as a synchronization of coupled oscillators, a mechanism that presumed a phase variable knowledge nodes do not possess, and it has been replaced by curvature-driven belief dynamics in which the local stability of a relation is measured by the Ollivier-Ricci curvature of its edge, computed by optimal transport over a true metric, with each edge's belief relaxing toward a logistic function of that curvature so that richly corroborated relations are drawn toward a crisp state while sparsely supported ones remain probabilistic. Reopening is now a direct consequence of the geometry rather than a special case, convergence is carried by a logarithmic cooling schedule rather than any claim of absolute locking, and the section states its central claim explicitly as a conjecture alongside a paragraph identifying why it is not yet a theorem. The metric layer of Section III has been reconciled in support of this: the framework now commits to L2-normalized embeddings, with cosine distance as the retrieval metric and Euclidean distance on the normalized embedding as the calibration metric, the two being one geometry on normalized vectors since squared Euclidean distance equals 2(1 − cosine similarity); the Manhattan distance presented as co-equal in the prior version has been removed from the operative framework and reserved only as a graph-intrinsic alternative for future work, and Sections 3.2 and 3.4 now compute on this single normalized-Euclidean geometry. Two references have been added, Ollivier (2009) and Geman and Geman (1984), with footnotes renumbered accordingly.

Files

Hic_Sunt_Dracones_v5.pdf

Files (360.6 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:07373f1527fafb787a8b811cf40a3069
360.6 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Identifiers

Other
6875878

Related works

Dates

Issued
2026-06-06