Does the Ghidan Planck-Cube Model Contradict Information Theory? Why Information May Travel Through Channels Before Geometry Appears

When we look at space, we naturally imagine straight lines.

If light travels from Earth to the Moon, we imagine a smooth path between two points. If we draw a square, the shortest route from one corner to the opposite corner is the diagonal. If we draw a cube, the shortest route from one corner to the opposite corner is the body diagonal.

That is how geometry teaches us to think.

But information theory starts from a different question.

It does not ask:

What is the shortest geometric path?

It asks:

What channels are available for information to travel through?

This difference is very important.

In information theory, information does not automatically travel through a diagonal just because the diagonal is shorter. Information travels only through defined channels.

If there is no channel, there is no direct transmission.

This gives a simple way to understand the Ghidan Planck-cube model.

The model does not need to contradict information theory. In fact, it can be understood as a natural extension of information theory into a possible physical substrate.

The key idea is this:

Information travels through channels first. Geometry appears later.