Published June 6, 2026 | Version v2

Agent Rooms: A Conceptual Framework for Persistent Human-Governed Multi-Agent Collaboration

Authors/Creators

Description

This paper introduces Agent Rooms as a conceptual framework for persistent, human-governed multi-agent collaboration. As LLM-based agents become increasingly capable of planning, using tools, coordinating with other agents, and producing complex artifacts, existing abstractions such as chats, crews, workflows, and simulations often remain insufficient to describe the durable organizational spaces where long-running agentic work takes place.

An Agent Room is defined as a persistent collaboration container that brings together human and AI participants, roles, goals, artifacts, memory, policies, communication protocols, audit events, and governance boundaries. The paper argues that multi-agent collaboration should not be treated merely as message exchange or task execution, but as a governed socio-technical process in which artifacts are created, revised, reviewed, approved, and preserved over time.

The contribution includes a formal definition of Agent Rooms, a lifecycle model, a communication protocol architecture, a context-engineering and memory-governance model, a failure-mode analysis, and an evaluation protocol. The paper also presents Campaign Builder as a reference prototype that instantiates several core mechanisms of the framework, including planner-mediated collaboration, structured handoffs, persistent transcripts, artifact blackboards, audit events, bounded agent mentions, recursive sub-rooms, governed context selection, quality gates, and observable evaluation hooks.

The prototype is presented as an implemented design reference rather than definitive empirical validation. The paper’s main goal is to define a clearer unit of analysis and design for auditable, artifact-producing, human-governed multi-agent systems.

Files

Agent Rooms_ A Conceptual Framework for Persistent Human-Governed Multi-Agent Collaboration.pdf

Additional details

Related works

Is supplement to
Preprint: 10.5281/zenodo.20547372 (DOI)

References

  • Wu, Q., Bansal, G., Zhang, J., Wu, Y., Li, B., Zhu, E., Li, L., Zhang, X., Zhang, S., Liu, J., Awadallah, A., White, R., Burger, D., and Wang, C. (2023). AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversation. arXiv:2308.08155.
  • Hong, S., Zhuge, M., Chen, J., Zheng, X., Cheng, Y., Zhang, C., Wang, J., Wang, Z., Yau, S., Lin, Z., Zhou, L., Ran, C., Xiao, L., and Wu, C. (2024). MetaGPT: Meta Programming for a Multi-Agent Collaborative Framework. ICLR 2024. arXiv:2308.00352.
  • Li, G., Hammoud, H., Itani, H., Khizbullin, D., and Ghanem, B. (2023). CAMEL: Communicative Agents for Mind Exploration of Large Language Model Society. NeurIPS 2023. arXiv:2303.17760.
  • Park, J. S., O'Brien, J. C., Cai, C. J., Morris, M. R., Liang, P., and Bernstein, M. S. (2023). Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behavior. UIST 2023. arXiv:2304.03442.
  • Li, X., Wang, S., Zeng, S., Wu, Y., and Yang, Y. (2024). A survey on LLM-based multi-agent systems: workflow, infrastructure, and challenges. Vicinagearth, 1(9). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44336-024-00009-2.
  • Guo, T., Chen, X., Wang, Y., Chang, R., Pei, S., Chawla, N. V., Wiest, O., and Zhang, X. (2024). Large Language Model based Multi-Agents: A Survey of Progress and Challenges. Proceedings of IJCAI 2024, Survey Track.
  • Gao, C., Lan, X., Li, N., Yuan, Y., Ding, J., Zhou, Z., Xu, F., and Li, Y. (2024). Large language models empowered agent-based modeling and simulation: a survey and perspectives. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, 1259. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03611-3.
  • Pretel, E., Moya, A., Navarro, E., Lopez-Jaquero, V., and Gonzalez, P. (2024). Analysing the synergies between Multi-agent Systems and Digital Twins: A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 174, 107503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2024.107503.
  • LangChain. (2026). Persistence - LangGraph Documentation. Official documentation. https://docs.langchain.com/oss/python/langgraph/persistence. Accessed June 2026.
  • CrewAI. (2026). CrewAI Documentation. Official documentation. https://docs.crewai.com/. Accessed June 2026.
  • Masters, C., Vellanki, A., Shangguan, J., Kultys, B., Gilmore, J., Moore, A., and Albrecht, S. V. (2025). Orchestrating Human-AI Teams: The Manager Agent as a Unifying Research Challenge. arXiv:2510.02557.
  • Zhang, J., Xiang, J., Yu, Z., Teng, F., Chen, X., Chen, J., Zhuge, M., Cheng, X., Hong, S., Wang, J., Zheng, B., Liu, B., Luo, Y., and Wu, C. (2025). AFlow: Automating Agentic Workflow Generation. ICLR 2025. arXiv:2410.10762.
  • Shekkizhar, S., Cosentino, R., Earle, A., and Savarese, S. (2025). Echoing: Identity Failures when LLM Agents Talk to Each Other. arXiv:2511.09710.
  • Rainer, A., and Wohlin, C. (2024). Reporting case studies in systematic literature studies: An evidential problem. Information and Software Technology, 174, 107501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2024.107501.
  • Maier, R., Schlattl, A., Guess, T., and Mottok, J. (2024). CausalOps - Towards an industrial lifecycle for causal probabilistic graphical models. Information and Software Technology, 174, 107520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2024.107520.