The Principal Well-Being Crisis: Examining Workload Isolation, and Sustainability in Kentucky School Leadership
Authors/Creators
Description
This mixed-methods study examines the working conditions and well-being of Kentucky principals through surveys (N = 66), focus groups (24 principals and 15 superintendents), and analysis of the Impact KY Working Conditions Survey (2023–2024). The well-being crisis among school principals is not merely an individual concern but a systemic issue operating at school, district, and state levels, with far-reaching implications for schools and students. Findings reveal a profession under significant strain, with principals reporting inadequate support to meet the complex demands of an ever-evolving role. Key themes include excessive workload, professional isolation, emotional exhaustion, and the 24/7 nature of the principalship that threatens sustainability in the role. Principals cite time constraints, compliance burdens, and lack of work-life balance as primary barriers to effectiveness and well-being. The Impact KY data revealed significant perception gaps, with principals rating working conditions 19–33 points higher than teachers, suggesting leadership may not fully recognize the depth of challenges facing both principals and staff. Both principals and teachers identified resources and emotional well-being as areas of greatest concern. The study documents how compliance requirements, inadequate staffing, and limited mental health supports contribute to principal burnout and attrition. Findings call for strengthened mentorship systems, policy streamlining, increased operational support, and coordinated well-being initiatives across state agencies, districts, and universities to ensure principal effectiveness and retention.
Files
The Principal Well-Being Crisis Examining Workload Isolation, and Sustainability in Kentucky School Leadership.pdf
Files
(778.7 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:8eac38626b216083d6ff89181d9717eb
|
778.7 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
References
- Beausaert, S., Froehlich, D. E., Devos, C., & Riley, P. (2023). What about school principals' well-being? The role of social capital. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 51(2), 405–421. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143221991853 Boyd, D., Grossman, P., Ing, M., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2011). The influence of school administrators on teacher retention decisions. American Educational Research Journal, 48(2), 303–333. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831210380788 Darling-Hammond, L., LaPointe, M., Meyerson, D., Orr. M. T., & Cohen, C. (2007). Preparing School Leaders for a Changing World: Lessons from Exemplary Leadership Development Programs. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Stanford Educational Leadership Institute. Dor-Haim, P. (2022). The experience of loneliness among school principals: Episodic loneliness versus persistent day-to-day loneliness. Journal of Educational Administration, 60(5), 527–541. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-11-2021-0204 Federici, R. A. (2012). Principals' self-efficacy: Relations with job autonomy, job satisfaction, and contextual constraints. Social Psychology of Education, 15(3), 295–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-012-9183-5 Goldring, E. B., Preston, C., & Huff, J (2012). Conceptualizing and Evaluating Professional Development for School Leaders. Planning and Changing, 43(3/4), 223–242. Grissom, J. A., Egalite, A. J., & Lindsay, C. A. (2021). How principals affect students and schools: A systematic synthesis of two decades of research. Wallace Foundation. http://www.wallacefoundation.org/principalsynthesis Grissom, J. A., & Loeb, S. (2011). Triangulating principal effectiveness: How perspectives of parents, teachers, and assistant principals identify the central importance of managerial skills. American Educational Research Journal, 48(5), 1091–1123. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831211402663 Grissom, J. A., Santelli, F. A., & Loeb, S. (2025). Fragmentation, administration, and isolation? Evidence on principal time use from large-scale observations in four urban districts. Educational Administration Quarterly. Hargreaves, A., & O'Connor, M. T. (2018). Collaborative professionalism: When teaching together means learning for all. Corwin Press. Impact KY Working Conditions Survey. (2023–2024). https://www.impactky.org/ Lam, H., Giessner, S. R., Shemla, M., & Werner, M. D. (2024). Leader and leadership loneliness: A review-based critique and path to future research. The Leadership Quarterly, 35(3), 101780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2024.101780 Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1596077 Snodgrass Rangel, V. (2017). A review of the literature on principal turnover. Review of Educational Research, 88(1), 87–124. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317743197 Upadyaya, K., Toyama, H., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2021). School principals' stress profiles during COVID-19: Demands and resources. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 731929. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.731929 Wallace Foundation. (2015). Building principal pipelines: A strategy to strengthen education leadership. The Wallace Foundation. https://www.wallacefoundation.org/sites/default/files/2023-09/Building-Principal- Pipelines.pdf