There is a newer version of the record available.

Published June 5, 2026 | Version V 1.0

Cognitive Stable States as the Ontogenetic Foundation of Causal Explanation: With a Commentary on Salmon's Blue Chalk Counterexample

Authors/Creators

Description

Why do different attributes carry unequal explanatory weights in causal explanation? Although both momentum and colour comply with conserved-quantity transmission in physical interactions, momentum is universally recognized as a core causal factor, whereas colour is dismissed as a trivial epiphenomenon. This long-standing puzzle, formalized as Salmon’s blue chalk counterexample, has perplexed the philosophy of science for nearly three decades.

This paper argues that the persistent paradox arises not from inherent defects in existing causal mechanism theories, but from cross-level cognitive misalignment. Treating human cognition as a resource-bounded information compression process, we identify four naturally emergent discrete cognitive stable states: Primordial Percept (L1), Symbolic Percept (L2), Formalised Percept (L3), and Algorithmic Percept (L4). We demonstrate that Salmon attempted to resolve an L1-originated ontogenetic puzzle through L3–L4 formal and algorithmic tools. The primitive bias for explanatory relevance stems from evolutionary embodied filtering, rather than physical conservation rules or statistical correlation.

We further formulate six fundamental relations between cognitive stable states: Compression (P1), Generation (P2), Realisation (P3), Dependence (P4), Emergence (P5), and Rollback (P6). Compression and rollback form the complementary dual wings of cognitive dynamics. As an intrinsic compensatory mechanism for unavoidable information loss in compression, cognitive rollback dismantles rigid stable configurations and restores cognitive freedom, rather than merely reversing compression. Together, the six propositions construct a unified ontogenetic framework of cognition, which fundamentally grounds the theory of causal explanation. Furthermore, this framework demarcates the structural boundaries and upper capacity limits of artificial causal reasoning in AI systems.

Files

20260605_认知稳定态:因果解释的发生学基础V1_Zenodo.pdf

Files (566.4 kB)

Additional details

Related works

Continues
Preprint: 10.5281/zenodo.20343486 (DOI)
Preprint: 10.5281/zenodo.20237687 (DOI)
Preprint: 10.5281/zenodo.20458185 (DOI)

Dates

Submitted
2026-06-05

References

  • 陈力钧. 因果律作为极限收敛:休谟问题的取象-贝叶斯解构[EB/OL]. Zenodo, 2026. DOI:10.5281/zenodo.20343486.
  • 陈力钧. 取象与贝叶斯:认知哲学视角下概率论的本质重构[EB/OL]. Zenodo, 2026. DOI:10.5281/zenodo.20237687.
  • HITCHCOCK C R. Discussion: Salmon on Explanatory Relevance[J]. Philosophy of Science, 1995, 62(2): 304-320. DOI:10.1086/289855.
  • SALMON W C. Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World[M]. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984: 141-155
  • DOWE P. Physical Causation[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000: 89-102.
  • WOODWARD J. Making Things Happen: A Theory of Causal Explanation[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003: 1-28, 45-63.
  • 陈力钧. "主客二分"的奠基:取象比类视域下的人类认知的统一场论[EB/OL]. Zenodo, 2026. DOI:10.5281/zenodo.20458185.
  • MASCALZONI E, REGOLIN L, VALLORTIGARA G, et al. The Cradle of Causal Reasoning: Newborns' Preference for Physical Causality[J]. Developmental Science, 2013, 16(3): 327-335.
  • BAILLARGEON R. Infants' Reasoning about Physical Events[J]. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2004, 13(6): 255-259.
  • ÖHMAN A, MINEKA S. Fears, phobias, and preparedness: Toward an evolved module of fear and fear learning[J]. Psychological Review, 2001, 108(3): 483-522. DOI:10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.483.
  • LEDOUX J E. The emotional brain: The mysterious underpinnings of emotional life[M]. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1996: 131-165.
  • MILIANI M, AURIEMMA S, BONDIELLI A, et al. ExpliCa: Evaluating Explicit Causal Reasoning in Large Language Models[C]//Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2025. 2025: 17335-17355. arXiv:2502.15487v1 [cs.CL].
  • SHETH I, FATEMI B, FRITZ M. CausalGraph2LLM: Benchmarking Causal Reasoning Abilities of Large Language Models[EB/OL]. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.15939v2 [cs.CL], 2024.
  • CASANOVA A, HENDY C, VU T, et al. Understanding the Effects of RLHF on LLM Generalisation and Diversity[EB/OL]. arXiv:2310.06452v2 [cs.CL], 2023 (updated 2024). https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.06452.