Published June 5, 2026 | Version v1

USING NEW PEDAGOGICAL TECHNOLOGIES AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN TEACHING MATHEMATICS

Description

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into educational frameworks has initiated a paradigm shift in pedagogical methodologies, particularly within the domain of mathematics. Mathematics education traditionally suffers from standardized approaches that fail to address heterogeneous student learning paces, cognitive styles, and localized conceptual gaps. This article explores the application of modern pedagogical technologies driven by AI, including Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS), adaptive assessment platforms, and predictive analytics. Drawing on empirical data from global implementations, the study examines how AI optimizes customized learning trajectories, provides instantaneous diagnostic feedback, and alleviates cognitive load. The findings indicate that AI-driven pedagogical tools improve mathematical proficiency by 15% to 25% compared to conventional instructional methods, while simultaneously optimizing the time allocation of educators. The methodology utilizes a comprehensive review of recent educational experiments, quantitative data synthesis, and comparative analysis of adaptive algorithms. The article concludes with a discussion on structural challenges, including algorithmic bias, data privacy, and the evolving role of the educator in an AI-mediated classroom.

Files

38-41.pdf

Files (177.3 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:edf9b7fd7105c5aca76753828acfca5e
177.3 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • 1. Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Promises and Implications for Teaching and Learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign. pp. 45–62.
  • 2.Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence Unleashed: An argument for AI in Education. Pearson Education. pp. 12–28.
  • 3.Baker, R. S., & Inventado, P. S. (2014). Educational Data Mining and Learning Analytics. Learning Analytics: Fundaments, Applications, and Trends, pp. 61–75.
  • 4.VanLehn, K. (2011). The Relative Effectiveness of Human Tutors, Intelligent Tutoring Systems, and Other Tutoring Platforms. Educational Psychologist, 46(4), pp. 197–221.
  • 5.Ritter, S., Anderson, J. R., Koedinger, K. R., & Corbett, A. (2007). Cognitive Tutor: Applied research in mathematics education. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(2), pp. 249–255.