Versioned Archive and Review of Biotic Interactions
and Taxon Names Found within globalbioticinteractions/foodwebsdatabase
hash://md5/7d4d8f3e9d7868e8c84e1d52ac272d64
by Nomer, Elton and Preston, three naive review
bots
Life on Earth is sustained by complex interactions between organisms
and their environment. These biotic interactions can be captured in
datasets and published digitally. We present a review and archiving
process for such an openly accessible digital interactions dataset of
known origin and discuss its outcome. The dataset under review, named
globalbioticinteractions/foodwebsdatabase, has fingerprint
hash://md5/7d4d8f3e9d7868e8c84e1d52ac272d64, is 6.88MiB in size and
contains 20,823 interactions with 1 unique type of association (e.g.,
eats) between 362 primary taxa (e.g., Salmo trutta) and 668 associated
taxa (e.g., Simuliidae). This report includes detailed summaries of
interaction data, a taxonomic review from multiple catalogs, and an
archived version of the dataset from which the reviews are derived.
Introduction
Data Review and Archive
Data review and archiving can be a time-consuming process, especially
when done manually. This review report aims to help facilitate both
activities. It automates the archiving of datasets, including Darwin
Core archives, and is a citable backup of a version of the dataset.
Additionally, an automatic review of species interaction claims made in
the dataset is generated and registered with Global Biotic Interactions
(J. H. Poelen, Simons,
and Mungall 2014).
This review includes summary statistics about, and observations
about, the dataset under review :
Gray, C., Ma, A., Perkins, D., Hudson, L., Figueroa, D., &
Woodward, G. (2015). Database of trophic interactions [Data set].
Zenodo. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13751
https://github.com/globalbioticinteractions/foodwebsdatabase/archive/4aa24df2e9712264a52b148f6486df4b54ee7c49.zip
2026-06-02T15:06:30.457Z hash://md5/7d4d8f3e9d7868e8c84e1d52ac272d64
Methods
The review is performed through programmatic scripts that leverage
tools like Preston (Elliott
et al. 2025), Elton (Kuhn, Poelen, and Leinweber 2025), Nomer
(Salim and Poelen
2025), globinizer (J. Poelen, Seltmann, and Mietchen 2024)
combined with third-party tools like grep, mlr, tail and head.
The review process can be described in the form of the script below
1.
# get versioned copy of the dataset (size approx. 6.88MiB) under review
elton pull globalbioticinteractions/foodwebsdatabase
# generate review notes
elton review globalbioticinteractions/foodwebsdatabase \
> review.tsv
# export indexed interaction records
elton interactions globalbioticinteractions/foodwebsdatabase \
> interactions.tsv
# export names and align them with the Catalogue of Life using Nomer
elton names globalbioticinteractions/foodwebsdatabase \
| nomer append col \
> name-alignment.tsv
In the following sections, the results of the review are summarized
2. Then, links to the detailed review
reports are provided.
Files
An extensive list of files produced as part of the review process can
be found in Appendix A. Review
Files.
Archived Dataset
Note that data.zip file in this
archive contains the complete, unmodified archived dataset under
review.
Biotic Interactions
Biotic Interaction Data
Model
In this review, biotic interactions (or biotic associations) are
modeled as a primary (aka subject, source) organism interacting with an
associate (aka object, target) organism. The dataset under review
classified the primary/associate organisms with specific taxa. The
primary and associate organisms The kind of interaction is documented as
an interaction type.
The dataset under review, named
globalbioticinteractions/foodwebsdatabase, has fingerprint
hash://md5/7d4d8f3e9d7868e8c84e1d52ac272d64, is 6.88MiB in size and
contains 20,823 interactions with 1 unique type of association (e.g.,
eats) between 362 primary taxa (e.g., Salmo trutta) and 668 associated
taxa (e.g., Simuliidae).
An exhaustive list of indexed interaction claims can be found in
gzipped csv, tsv, geopackage and parquet archives. To facilitate
discovery, a preview of claims available in the gzipped html page at indexed-interactions.html.gz are
shown below.
The exhaustive list was used to create the following data summaries
below.
Sample of Indexed Interaction Claims
sourceTaxonName
interactionTypeName
targetTaxonName
referenceCitation
Ancylus fluviatilis
eats
FPOM
Ledger, M.E., Brown, L.E., Edwards, F., Milner, A.M. & Woodward,
G. (2012) Drought alters the structure and functioning of complex food
webs. Nature Climate Change.
Ancylus fluviatilis
eats
CPOM
Ledger, M.E., Brown, L.E., Edwards, F., Milner, A.M. & Woodward,
G. (2012) Drought alters the structure and functioning of complex food
webs. Nature Climate Change.
Ancylus fluviatilis
eats
Navicula gregaria
Ledger, M.E., Brown, L.E., Edwards, F., Milner, A.M. & Woodward,
G. (2012) Drought alters the structure and functioning of complex food
webs. Nature Climate Change.
Ancylus fluviatilis
eats
Navicula tripunctata
Ledger, M.E., Brown, L.E., Edwards, F., Milner, A.M. & Woodward,
G. (2012) Drought alters the structure and functioning of complex food
webs. Nature Climate Change.
Most Frequently Mentioned Interaction Types (up to 20 most
frequent)
interactionTypeName
count
eats
20823
Most Frequently Mentioned Primary Taxa (up to 20 most
frequent)
sourceTaxonName
count
Salmo trutta
3212
Cordulegaster
655
Isoperla grammatica
603
Trissopelopia
513
Cottus gobio
472
Perlodes microcephalus
415
Rhyacophila dorsalis
394
Sialis
289
Macropelopia
286
Phoxinus phoxinus
272
Anguilla anguilla
271
Esox lucius
218
Siphonoperla torrentium
204
Microtendipes
187
Gammarus pulex
173
Radix balthica
171
Elmis aenea
164
Limnius volckmari
162
Plectrocnemia
160
Most Frequently Mentioned Associate Taxa (up to 20 most
frequent)
targetTaxonName
count
Simuliidae
1498
Baetis
575
Orthocladiinae
524
Chironomidae
488
Algae
480
Gammarus pulex
422
Heterotrissocladius
401
CPOM
361
Achnanthes
323
Nemurella
294
FPOM
262
Cocconeis placentula
252
Rhoicosphenia abbreviata
203
Leuctra nigra
199
Gomphonema olivaceum
197
Melosira varians
192
Navicula tripunctata
189
Amphora pediculus
185
Staurosira elliptica
183
Most Frequent Interactions between Primary and Associate Taxa
(up to 20 most frequent)
sourceTaxonName
interactionTypeName
targetTaxonName
count
Salmo trutta
eats
Simuliidae
1112
Salmo trutta
eats
Orthocladiinae
359
Salmo trutta
eats
Gammarus pulex
325
Salmo trutta
eats
Baetis
287
Cordulegaster
eats
Nemurella
212
Isoperla grammatica
eats
Algae
188
Anguilla anguilla
eats
Simuliidae
146
Salmo trutta
eats
Lepidostoma hirtum
125
Perlodes microcephalus
eats
Algae
121
Cottus gobio
eats
Simuliidae
120
Trissopelopia
eats
Heterotrissocladius
116
Salmo trutta
eats
Silo pallipes
115
Salmo trutta
eats
Tanytarsini
113
Rhyacophila dorsalis
eats
Chironomidae
112
Isoperla grammatica
eats
Chironomidae
103
Rhyacophila dorsalis
eats
Algae
94
Perlodes microcephalus
eats
Chironomidae
93
Macropelopia
eats
Heterotrissocladius
91
Cordulegaster
eats
Heterotrissocladius
90
Interaction Networks
The figures below provide a graph view on the dataset under review.
The first shows a summary network on the kingdom level, and the second
shows how interactions on the family level. It is important to note that
both network graphs were first aligned taxonomically using the Catalogue
of Life. Please refer to the original (or verbatim) taxonomic names for
a more original view on the interaction data.
Interactions on taxonomic kingdom rank as
interpreted by the Catalogue of Life download
svgInteractions on the taxonomic family rank
as interpreted by the Catalogue of Life. download
svg
If geospatial information was extracted from the dataset under
review, the map below will show their distribution. These maps were
generated using MapServer (McKenna et al. 2025) tools
configured via map configuration indexed-interactions.map :
MAP
SIZE 1600 800
EXTENT -180 -90 180 90
PROJECTION
"init=epsg:4326"
END
LAYER # MODIS WMS map from NASA
NAME "modis_nasa"
TYPE RASTER
OFFSITE 0 0 0
STATUS ON
CONNECTIONTYPE WMS
CONNECTION "https://gibs.earthdata.nasa.gov/wms/epsg4326/best/wms.cgi?"
METADATA
"wms_srs" "EPSG:4326"
"wms_name" "OSM_Land_Water_Map"
"wms_server_version" "1.1.1"
"wms_format" "image/jpeg"
END
CLASS
STYLE
COLOR 232 232 232
OUTLINECOLOR 32 32 32
END
END
END
LAYER
NAME "indexed-interactions"
TYPE POLYGON
STATUS ON
CONNECTIONTYPE OGR
CONNECTION "indexed-interactions-h3.gpkg"
DATA "indexed-interactions-h3"
CLASS
STYLE
COLORRANGE 253.0 231.0 37.0 32.0 164.0 134.0
DATARANGE NULL NULL
RANGEITEM "log_number_of_records"
OUTLINECOLOR 0 0 0
END
END
END
END
Hexagonal grid cells indicate that
interactions claims are available for selected geospatial area: light
yellow means relatively fewer claims, dark green relatively more
claims.
Another way to discover the dataset under review is by searching for
it on the GloBI
website.
Taxonomic Alignment
As part of the review, all names are aligned against various name
catalogs (e.g., col, ncbi, discoverlife, gbif, itis, wfo, mdd, tpt,
pbdb, and worms). These alignments can help review name usage or aid in
selecting of a suitable taxonomic name resource.
Sample of Name Alignments
providedName
relationName
resolvedCatalogName
resolvedName
Acanthocyclops vernalis
SYNONYM_OF
col
Acanthocyclops vernalis vernalis
Acanthocyclops vernalis
HAS_ACCEPTED_NAME
col
Acanthocyclops vernalis
Acari
NONE
col
Acari
Achnanthes altaica
SYNONYM_OF
col
Psammothidium altaicum
Distribution of Taxonomic Ranks of Aligned Names by Catalog.
Names that were not aligned with a catalog are counted as NAs. So, the
total number of unaligned names for a catalog will be listed in their NA
row.
resolvedCatalogName
resolvedRank
count
col
NA
56
col
class
4
col
family
27
col
genus
221
col
infraorder
1
col
kingdom
1
col
order
11
col
phylum
4
col
species
500
col
subclass
1
col
subfamily
4
col
subgenus
15
col
suborder
3
col
subspecies
10
col
tribe
8
col
variety
2
discoverlife
NA
827
gbif
NA
49
gbif
class
5
gbif
family
24
gbif
form
7
gbif
genus
221
gbif
kingdom
1
gbif
order
12
gbif
phylum
4
gbif
species
511
gbif
subspecies
7
gbif
variety
15
itis
NA
187
itis
class
5
itis
family
23
itis
genus
202
itis
infraorder
1
itis
kingdom
1
itis
order
11
itis
phylum
5
itis
species
375
itis
subclass
3
itis
subfamily
5
itis
suborder
3
itis
subspecies
1
itis
superorder
1
itis
tribe
4
itis
variety
1
mdd
NA
826
ncbi
NA
163
ncbi
clade
1
ncbi
class
3
ncbi
cohort
1
ncbi
family
23
ncbi
genus
206
ncbi
infraorder
1
ncbi
kingdom
1
ncbi
order
11
ncbi
phylum
6
ncbi
species
397
ncbi
subclass
4
ncbi
subfamily
5
ncbi
subgenus
4
ncbi
suborder
4
ncbi
subspecies
1
ncbi
tribe
4
ncbi
varietas
1
pbdb
NA
637
pbdb
class
7
pbdb
family
21
pbdb
genus
107
pbdb
informal
1
pbdb
infraclass
1
pbdb
infraorder
2
pbdb
kingdom
1
pbdb
order
11
pbdb
phylum
5
pbdb
species
25
pbdb
subclass
2
pbdb
subfamily
6
pbdb
suborder
3
pbdb
tribe
4
pbdb
unranked clade
1
tpt
NA
767
tpt
species
59
wfo
NA
816
wfo
genus
10
worms
NA
421
worms
class
3
worms
family
19
worms
forma
1
worms
genus
116
worms
kingdom
2
worms
order
13
worms
phylum
5
worms
phylum (division)
1
worms
species
228
worms
subclass
4
worms
subfamily
5
worms
suborder
4
worms
subspecies
2
worms
tribe
2
worms
variety
11
Name relationship types per catalog. Name relationship type
“NONE” means that a name was not recognized by the associated catalog.
“SAME_AS” indicates either a “HAS_ACCEPTED_NAME” or “SYNONYM_OF” name
relationship type. We recognize that “SYNONYM_OF” encompasses many types
of nomenclatural synonymies (ICZN 1999) (e.g., junior synonym, senior
synonyms).
resolvedCatalogName
relationName
count
col
SYNONYM_OF
197
col
HAS_ACCEPTED_NAME
808
col
NONE
61
discoverlife
NONE
834
gbif
HAS_ACCEPTED_NAME
871
gbif
NONE
54
gbif
SYNONYM_OF
193
itis
HAS_ACCEPTED_NAME
615
itis
SYNONYM_OF
37
itis
NONE
192
mdd
NONE
833
ncbi
SAME_AS
659
ncbi
NONE
168
ncbi
SYNONYM_OF
23
pbdb
NONE
642
pbdb
SYNONYM_OF
19
pbdb
HAS_ACCEPTED_NAME
190
tpt
NONE
774
tpt
HAS_ACCEPTED_NAME
98
tpt
SYNONYM_OF
37
wfo
NONE
823
wfo
HAS_ACCEPTED_NAME
5
wfo
HAS_UNCHECKED_NAME
2
wfo
SYNONYM_OF
4
worms
HAS_ACCEPTED_NAME
414
worms
SYNONYM_OF
82
worms
NONE
426
List of Available Name Alignment Reports
catalog name
alignment results
col
associated names alignments report in gzipped html, csv, and tsv)
ncbi
associated names alignments report in gzipped html, csv, and tsv)
discoverlife
associated names alignments report in gzipped html, csv, and tsv)
gbif
associated names alignments report in gzipped html, csv, and tsv)
itis
associated names alignments report in gzipped html, csv, and tsv)
wfo
associated names alignments report in gzipped html, csv, and tsv)
mdd
associated names alignments report in gzipped html, csv, and tsv)
tpt
associated names alignments report in gzipped html, csv, and tsv)
pbdb
associated names alignments report in gzipped html, csv, and tsv)
worms
associated names alignments report in gzipped html, csv, and tsv)
Additional Reviews
Elton, Nomer, and other tools may have difficulties interpreting
existing species interaction datasets. Or, they may misbehave, or
otherwise show unexpected behavior. As part of the review process,
detailed review notes are kept that document possibly misbehaving, or
confused, review bots. An sample of review notes associated with this
review can be found below.
In addition, you can find the most frequently occurring notes in the
table below.
: Most frequently occurring review notes, if any.
For additional information on review notes, please have a look at the
first 500 Review Notes in html format
or the download full gzipped csv or tsv archives.
GloBI Review Badge
As part of the review, a review badge is generated. This review badge
can be included in webpages to indicate the review status of the dataset
under review.
Note that if the badge is green, no review notes were generated. If
the badge is yellow, the review bots may need some help with
interpreting the species interaction data.
GloBI Index Badge
If the dataset under review has been registered with
GloBI, and has been succesfully indexed by GloBI, the GloBI Index
Status Badge will turn green. This means that the dataset under review
was indexed by GloBI and is available through GloBI services and derived
data products.
If you’d like to keep track of reviews or index status of the dataset
under review, please visit GloBI’s dataset index 5 for
badge examples.
Discussion
This review and archive provides a means of creating citable versions
of datasets that change frequently. This may be useful for dataset
managers, including natural history collection data managers, as a
backup archive of a shared Darwin Core archive. It also serves as a
means of creating a trackable citation for the dataset in an automated
way, while also including some information about the contents of the
dataset.
This review aims to provide a perspective on the dataset to aid in
understanding of species interaction claims discovered. However, it is
important to note that this review does not assess the quality
of the dataset. Instead, it serves as an indication of the open-ness6 and FAIRness (Wilkinson et
al. 2016; Trekels et al. 2023) of the dataset: to perform this
review, the data was likely openly available, Findable,
Accessible, Interoperable and
Reusable. The current Open-FAIR assessment is
qualitative, and a more quantitative approach can be implemented with
specified measurement units.
This report also showcases the reuse of machine-actionable
(meta)data, something highly recommended by the FAIR Data Principles
(Wilkinson et al.
2016). Making (meta)data machine-actionable enables more precise
procesing by computers, enabling even naive review bots like Nomer and
Elton to interpret the data effectively. This capability is crucial for
not just automating the generation of reports, but also for facilitating
seamless data exchanges, promoting interoperability.
Acknowledgements
We thank the many humans that created us and those who created and
maintained the data, software and other intellectual resources that were
used for producing this review. In addition, we are grateful for the
natural resources providing the basis for these human and bot
activities. Also, thanks to https://github.com/zygoballus for helping
improve the layout of the review tables.
Author contributions
Nomer was responsible for name alignments. Elton carried out dataset
extraction, and generated the review notes. Preston tracked, versioned,
and packaged, the dataset under review.
network diagram showing the taxon family to taxon family interaction
claims in the dataset under review as interpreted by the Catalogue of
Life via Nomer Corpus of Taxonomic Resources (J. H. (ed. ). Poelen 2024)
network diagram showing the taxon kingdom to taxon kingom
interaction claims in the dataset under review as interpreted by the
Catalogue of Life via Nomer Corpus of Taxonomic Resources (J. H. (ed. ). Poelen
2024)
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with the
Catalogue of Life as accessed through the Nomer Corpus of Taxonomic
Resources (J. H. (ed. ).
Poelen 2024) in gzipped comma-separated values format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with the
Catalogue of Life as accessed through the Nomer Corpus of Taxonomic
Resources (J. H. (ed. ).
Poelen 2024) in gzipped html format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with the
Catalogue of Life as accessed through the Nomer Corpus of Taxonomic
Resources (J. H. (ed. ).
Poelen 2024) in gzipped tab-separated values format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with the
Catalogue of Life as accessed through the Nomer Corpus of Taxonomic
Resources (J. H. (ed. ).
Poelen 2024) in Apache Parquet format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with
Discover Life bee species checklist as accessed through the Nomer Corpus
of Taxonomic Resources (J. H. (ed. ). Poelen 2024) in gzipped
comma-separated values format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with
Discover Life bee species checklist as accessed through the Nomer Corpus
of Taxonomic Resources (J. H. (ed. ). Poelen 2024) in gzipped
html format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with
Discover Life bee species checklist as accessed through the Nomer Corpus
of Taxonomic Resources (J. H. (ed. ). Poelen 2024) in gzipped
tab-separated values format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with
Discover Life bee species checklist as accessed through the Nomer Corpus
of Taxonomic Resources (J. H. (ed. ). Poelen 2024) in Apache
Parquet format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with GBIF
Backbone Taxonomy as accessed through the Nomer Corpus of Taxonomic
Resources (J. H. (ed. ).
Poelen 2024) in gzipped comma-separated values format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with GBIF
Backbone Taxonomy as accessed through the Nomer Corpus of Taxonomic
Resources (J. H. (ed. ).
Poelen 2024) in gzipped html format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with GBIF
Backbone Taxonomy as accessed through the Nomer Corpus of Taxonomic
Resources (J. H. (ed. ).
Poelen 2024) in gzipped tab-separated values format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with GBIF
Backbone Taxonomy as accessed through the Nomer Corpus of Taxonomic
Resources (J. H. (ed. ).
Poelen 2024) in Apache Parquet format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with
Integrated Taxonomic Information System (ITIS) as accessed through the
Nomer Corpus of Taxonomic Resources (J. H. (ed. ). Poelen 2024) in gzipped
comma-separated values format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with
Integrated Taxonomic Information System (ITIS) as accessed through the
Nomer Corpus of Taxonomic Resources (J. H. (ed. ). Poelen 2024) in gzipped
html format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with
Integrated Taxonomic Information System (ITIS) as accessed through the
Nomer Corpus of Taxonomic Resources (J. H. (ed. ). Poelen 2024) in gzipped
tab-separated values format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with
Integrated Taxonomic Information System (ITIS) as accessed through the
Nomer Corpus of Taxonomic Resources (J. H. (ed. ). Poelen 2024) in Apache
Parquet format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with the
Mammal Diversity Database as accessed through the Nomer Corpus of
Taxonomic Resources (J.
H. (ed. ). Poelen 2024) in gzipped comma-separated values
format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with
Mammal Diversity Database as accessed through the Nomer Corpus of
Taxonomic Resources (J.
H. (ed. ). Poelen 2024) in gzipped html format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with
Mammal Diversity Database as accessed through the Nomer Corpus of
Taxonomic Resources (J.
H. (ed. ). Poelen 2024) in gzipped tab-separated values
format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with
Mammal Diversity Database as accessed through the Nomer Corpus of
Taxonomic Resources (J.
H. (ed. ). Poelen 2024) in Apache Parquet format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with the
NCBI Taxonomy as accessed through the Nomer Corpus of Taxonomic
Resources (J. H. (ed. ).
Poelen 2024) in gzipped comma-separated values format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with the
NCBI Taxonomy as accessed through the Nomer Corpus of Taxonomic
Resources (J. H. (ed. ).
Poelen 2024) in gzipped html format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with the
NCBI Taxonomy as accessed through the Nomer Corpus of Taxonomic
Resources (J. H. (ed. ).
Poelen 2024) in gzipped tab-separated values format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with the
NCBI Taxonomy as accessed through the Nomer Corpus of Taxonomic
Resources (J. H. (ed. ).
Poelen 2024) in Apache Parquet format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with the
Paleobiology Database as accessed through the Nomer Corpus of Taxonomic
Resources (J. H. (ed. ).
Poelen 2024) in gzipped comma-separated values format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with
Paleobiology Database as accessed through the Nomer Corpus of Taxonomic
Resources (J. H. (ed. ).
Poelen 2024) in gzipped html format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with
Paleobiology Database as accessed through the Nomer Corpus of Taxonomic
Resources (J. H. (ed. ).
Poelen 2024) in gzipped tab-separated values format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with
Paleobiology Database as accessed through the Nomer Corpus of Taxonomic
Resources (J. H. (ed. ).
Poelen 2024) in Apache Parquet format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with the
Terrestrial Parasite Tracker (TPT) Taxonomic Resource as accessed
through the Nomer Corpus of Taxonomic Resources (J. H. (ed. ). Poelen 2024) in gzipped
comma-separated values format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with the
Terrestrial Parasite Tracker (TPT) Taxonomic Resource as accessed
through the Nomer Corpus of Taxonomic Resources (J. H. (ed. ). Poelen 2024) in gzipped
html format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with the
Terrestrial Parasite Tracker (TPT) Taxonomic Resource as accessed
through the Nomer Corpus of Taxonomic Resources (J. H. (ed. ). Poelen 2024) in gzipped
tab-separated values format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with the
Terrestrial Parasite Tracker (TPT) Taxonomic Resource as accessed
through the Nomer Corpus of Taxonomic Resources (J. H. (ed. ). Poelen 2024) in Apache
Parquet format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with the
World of Flora Online as accessed through the Nomer Corpus of Taxonomic
Resources (J. H. (ed. ).
Poelen 2024) in gzipped comma-separated values format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with the
World of Flora Online as accessed through the Nomer Corpus of Taxonomic
Resources (J. H. (ed. ).
Poelen 2024) in gzipped html format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with the
World of Flora Online as accessed through the Nomer Corpus of Taxonomic
Resources (J. H. (ed. ).
Poelen 2024) in gzipped tab-separated values format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with the
World of Flora Online as accessed through the Nomer Corpus of Taxonomic
Resources (J. H. (ed. ).
Poelen 2024) in Apache Parquet format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with the
World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) as accessed through the Nomer
Corpus of Taxonomic Resources (J. H. (ed. ). Poelen 2024) in gzipped
comma-separated values format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with the
World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) as accessed through the Nomer
Corpus of Taxonomic Resources (J. H. (ed. ). Poelen 2024) in gzipped
html format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with the
World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) as accessed through the Nomer
Corpus of Taxonomic Resources (J. H. (ed. ). Poelen 2024) in gzipped
tab-separated values format
taxonomic names found in the dataset under review aligned with the
World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) as accessed through the Nomer
Corpus of Taxonomic Resources (J. H. (ed. ). Poelen 2024) in Apache
Parquet format
Kuhn, Tobias, and Michel Dumontier. 2014. “Trusty URIs:
Verifiable, Immutable, and Permanent Digital Artifacts for Linked
Data.” In The Semantic Web: Trends and Challenges,
edited by Valentina Presutti, Claudia d’Amato, Fabien Gandon, Mathieu
d’Aquin, Steffen Staab, and Anna Tordai, 395–410. Cham: Springer
International Publishing.
McKenna, Jeff, Steve Lime, Thomas Bonfort, Jérome Boué, Howard Butler,
Seth Girvin, Tom Kralidis, et al. 2025. “MapServer.”
Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17807263.
Poelen, Jorrit H. (ed.). 2024. “Nomer Corpus of Taxonomic
Resources Hash://Sha256/
B60c0d25a16ae77b24305782017b1a270b79b5d1746f832650 F2027ba536e276
Hash://Md5/17f1363a277ee0e4ecaf1b91c665e47e.” Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12695629.
Poelen, Jorrit H., James D. Simons, and Chris J. Mungall. 2014.
“Global Biotic Interactions: An Open Infrastructure to Share and
Analyze Species-Interaction Datasets.”Ecological
Informatics 24 (November): 148–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2014.08.005.
Trekels, Maarten, Debora Pignatari Drucker, José Augusto Salim, Jeff
Ollerton, Jorrit Poelen, Filipi Miranda Soares, Max Rünzel, Muo Kasina,
Quentin Groom, and Mariano Devoto. 2023. “WorldFAIR Project (D10.1) Agriculture-related pollinator
data standards use cases report.” Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8176978.
Wilkinson, Mark D., Michel Dumontier, IJsbrand Jan Aalbersberg,
Gabrielle Appleton, Myles Axton, Arie Baak, Niklas Blomberg, et al.
2016. “The FAIR Guiding Principles for Scientific
Data Management and Stewardship.”Scientific Data 3 (1).
https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18.