Open-Source LLMs for Vulnerability Classification Under Code Obfuscation: Efficiency Benchmarks
Description
This report synthesises findings from 8 peer-reviewed papers addressing the following research question: How does the inference efficiency (latency, throughput) of Llama3, Codestral, and Deepseek R1 compare when classifying vulnerabilities in the Big-Vul dataset under increasing levels of code. 7 claims were extracted from source literature; 6 were independently verified against retrieved documents. An automated multi-reviewer quality assessment produced a score of 7.5/10. This report is a machine-generated literature synthesis and does not constitute original research.
Research goal: How does the inference efficiency (latency, throughput) of Llama3, Codestral, and Deepseek R1 compare when classifying vulnerabilities in the Big-Vul dataset under increasing levels of code obfuscation?
Autonomous literature synthesis. Automated review score: 7.5/10. Full text and citation available at Assignee Research.
Notes
Files
paper.pdf
Files
(89.7 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:f82476e50a286bb477b69da0cf50d2e6
|
89.7 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Related works
- Is compiled by
- https://assignee.net (URL)