Published June 3, 2026 | Version 1.0

Behavioral Modification and Social-Emotional Learning Frameworks in Pre-Kindergarten Settings: A Scoping Review of the Literature

  • 1. Western Governers University
  • 2. Rayan Academy

Contributors

Researcher:

Description

Ask any Pre-K teacher what the hardest part of their day is, and the answer is rarely the lesson plan. It is almost always a child — or several — whose behavior has derailed instruction, exhausted the classroom, and left the teacher wondering what they missed. This is not a story about bad children or overwhelmed teachers. It is a story about a missing system. Pre-Kindergarten behavioral disruption has reached levels that federal data now describes as a national crisis, with expulsion rates three times higher than K-12 and mounting evidence that children from underserved communities bear the heaviest weight of this failure. And yet, despite years of research investment in social-emotional learning and behavioral intervention, nobody has built the specific thing that Pre-K classrooms actually need: a framework that is tiered, data-generating, somatically grounded, and fully operational even when the lead teacher is absent. This scoping review set out to map what the literature actually contains on this topic. Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, I searched Google Scholar, ERIC, PsycINFO, and CINAHL for peer-reviewed studies published between 2000 and 2024 examining behavioral modification and SEL frameworks for children aged 3 to 5. What I found confirmed a pattern that any experienced Pre-K educator would recognize: plenty of good individual pieces, but no single framework that puts them together in a way that works in the real world. The review identifies four specific structural gaps — the absence of MTSS-tiered architecture integrated with a Pre-K SEL curriculum, the lack of a simple educator-operated quantifiable rubric, the neglect of somatic regulation instruction calibrated for 3-5 year olds, and the near-universal absence of substitute-teacher-ready protocols. Together these gaps define exactly what a new framework needs to be. The implications for curriculum development, equity, and national early childhood policy are discussed.

Files

Files (34.8 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:20f8ef099359acb76a00e9b587fbe54d
34.8 kB Download

Additional details

References

  • Bailey, B. (2015). Conscious discipline: Building resilient classrooms (3rd ed.). Loving Guidance.
  • Committee for Children. (2011). Second step: A violence prevention curriculum. Committee for Children.
  • Freedman, S., & Montgomery, D. (2020). Teacher burnout in early childhood settings: The role of behavioral management challenges. Early Childhood Education Journal, 48(4), 517–528.
  • Garcia, E., & Weiss, E. (2019). The teacher shortage is real, large and growing, and worse than we thought. Economic Policy Institute.
  • Gilliam, W. S. (2005). Prekindergarteners left behind: Expulsion rates in state prekindergarten programs. Yale University Child Study Center.
  • Greenberg, M. T., Kusche, C. A., Cook, E. T., & Quamma, J. P. (1995). Promoting emotional competence in school-aged children: The effects of the PATHS curriculum. Development and Psychopathology, 7(1), 117–136.
  • Heckman, J. J. (2006). Skill formation and the economics of investing in disadvantaged children. Science, 312(5782), 1900–1902.
  • Herman, K. C., Hickmon-Rosa, J., & Reinke, W. M. (2018). Empirically derived profiles of teacher stress, burnout, self-efficacy, and coping and associated student outcomes. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 20(2), 90–100.
  • Moffitt, T. E., Arseneault, L., Belsky, D., Dickson, N., Hancox, R. J., Harrington, H., & Caspi, A. (2011). A gradient of childhood self-control predicts health, wealth, and public safety. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(7), 2693–2698.
  • Shanker, S. (2016). Self-reg: How to help your child (and you) break the stress cycle and successfully engage with life. Penguin Press.
  • Sugai, G., & Horner, R. H. (2009). Responsiveness-to-intervention and school-wide positive behavior supports: Integration of multi-tiered system approaches. Exceptionality, 17(4), 223–237.
  • Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O'Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., & Straus, S. E. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467–473.
  • U.S. Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights. (2014). Civil rights data collection: Data snapshot — school discipline. U.S. Department of Education.
  • Van der Kolk, B. (2014). The body keeps the score: Brain, mind, and body in the healing of trauma. Viking.
  • Yoder, N. (2014). Teaching the whole child: Instructional practices that support social-emotional learning in three teacher evaluation frameworks. American Institutes for Research.