There is a newer version of the record available.

Published June 3, 2026 | Version 1.0
Preprint Embargoed

Behavioral Modification and Social-Emotional Learning Frameworks in Pre-Kindergarten Settings: A Scoping Review of the Literature

  • 1. Western Governers University
  • 2. Rayan Academy

Contributors

Researcher:

Description

Ask any Pre-K teacher what the hardest part of their day is, and the answer is rarely the lesson plan. It is almost always a child — or several — whose behavior has derailed instruction, exhausted the classroom, and left the teacher wondering what they missed. This is not a story about bad children or overwhelmed teachers. It is a story about a missing system. Pre-Kindergarten behavioral disruption has reached levels that federal data now describes as a national crisis, with expulsion rates three times higher than K-12 and mounting evidence that children from underserved communities bear the heaviest weight of this failure. And yet, despite years of research investment in social-emotional learning and behavioral intervention, nobody has built the specific thing that Pre-K classrooms actually need: a framework that is tiered, data-generating, somatically grounded, and fully operational even when the lead teacher is absent. This scoping review set out to map what the literature actually contains on this topic. Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, I searched Google Scholar, ERIC, PsycINFO, and CINAHL for peer-reviewed studies published between 2000 and 2024 examining behavioral modification and SEL frameworks for children aged 3 to 5. What I found confirmed a pattern that any experienced Pre-K educator would recognize: plenty of good individual pieces, but no single framework that puts them together in a way that works in the real world. The review identifies four specific structural gaps — the absence of MTSS-tiered architecture integrated with a Pre-K SEL curriculum, the lack of a simple educator-operated quantifiable rubric, the neglect of somatic regulation instruction calibrated for 3-5 year olds, and the near-universal absence of substitute-teacher-ready protocols. Together these gaps define exactly what a new framework needs to be. The implications for curriculum development, equity, and national early childhood policy are discussed.

Files

Embargoed

The files will be made publicly available on January 1, 2030.

Reason: updated data submitted in Ver2

Additional details

References

  • Bailey, B. (2015). Conscious discipline: Building resilient classrooms (3rd ed.). Loving Guidance.
  • Committee for Children. (2011). Second step: A violence prevention curriculum. Committee for Children.
  • Freedman, S., & Montgomery, D. (2020). Teacher burnout in early childhood settings: The role of behavioral management challenges. Early Childhood Education Journal, 48(4), 517–528.
  • Garcia, E., & Weiss, E. (2019). The teacher shortage is real, large and growing, and worse than we thought. Economic Policy Institute.
  • Gilliam, W. S. (2005). Prekindergarteners left behind: Expulsion rates in state prekindergarten programs. Yale University Child Study Center.
  • Greenberg, M. T., Kusche, C. A., Cook, E. T., & Quamma, J. P. (1995). Promoting emotional competence in school-aged children: The effects of the PATHS curriculum. Development and Psychopathology, 7(1), 117–136.
  • Heckman, J. J. (2006). Skill formation and the economics of investing in disadvantaged children. Science, 312(5782), 1900–1902.
  • Herman, K. C., Hickmon-Rosa, J., & Reinke, W. M. (2018). Empirically derived profiles of teacher stress, burnout, self-efficacy, and coping and associated student outcomes. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 20(2), 90–100.
  • Moffitt, T. E., Arseneault, L., Belsky, D., Dickson, N., Hancox, R. J., Harrington, H., & Caspi, A. (2011). A gradient of childhood self-control predicts health, wealth, and public safety. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(7), 2693–2698.
  • Shanker, S. (2016). Self-reg: How to help your child (and you) break the stress cycle and successfully engage with life. Penguin Press.
  • Sugai, G., & Horner, R. H. (2009). Responsiveness-to-intervention and school-wide positive behavior supports: Integration of multi-tiered system approaches. Exceptionality, 17(4), 223–237.
  • Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O'Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., & Straus, S. E. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467–473.
  • U.S. Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights. (2014). Civil rights data collection: Data snapshot — school discipline. U.S. Department of Education.
  • Van der Kolk, B. (2014). The body keeps the score: Brain, mind, and body in the healing of trauma. Viking.
  • Yoder, N. (2014). Teaching the whole child: Instructional practices that support social-emotional learning in three teacher evaluation frameworks. American Institutes for Research.