ARGIRA (IV): Structural Asymmetry in Sonification Mappings
Authors/Creators
Description
ARGIRA (IV): STRUCTURAL ASYMMETRY IN SONIFICATION MAPPINGS
OVERVIEW
This repository contains the complete code, data, and results for ARGIRA IV, a study investigating how visual image descriptors relate to the outputs of two algorithmic sonification mappings: OPRS and RTR.
Previous phases of the ARGIRA research program (ARGIRA I–III) attempted to predict the divergence score:
Δ = OPRS − RTR
from visual image characteristics.
Across multiple representational approaches—including low-level image statistics, engineered feature spaces, semantic embeddings, and multimodal language-model descriptors—predictive performance remained near zero or negative under cross-validation.
ARGIRA IV revisits this problem by modeling OPRS and RTR independently rather than modeling their difference directly.
RESEARCH QUESTION
Do OPRS and RTR preserve different types of visual information from the same source image?
Instead of predicting the composite score Δ, this phase evaluates the visual predictability of each sonification mapping separately.
DATASET
Input dataset:
dataset_canonico_86_v1.csv
The analyzed subset includes valid image records for which all required visual predictors and sonification outputs were available.
Visual predictors:
• Naive Roughness
• Hue Standard Deviation
• Hue Entropy
Targets:
• OPRS Acoustic Roughness
• RTR Acoustic Roughness
METHODOLOGY
The experiment evaluates OPRS and RTR independently using:
• Ridge Regression
• Random Forest Regression
• 5-Fold Cross-Validation
• Permutation Testing
Performance is measured using cross-validated R².
Feature importance is estimated using Random Forest models.
MAIN RESULTS
OPRS
• Ridge Regression: R²CV = 0.582
• Random Forest: R²CV = 0.528
OPRS exhibits substantial predictability from visual image descriptors.
The dominant predictor is Naive Roughness, which accounts for most of the predictive signal.
RTR
• Ridge Regression: R²CV = 0.247
• Random Forest: R²CV = 0.086
RTR shows considerably weaker predictability.
Its behavior appears more strongly associated with chromatic descriptors than with texture-related measures.
INTERPRETATION
The results suggest that OPRS and RTR preserve different aspects of visual information.
Rather than indicating an absence of image–sound relationships, the negative findings reported in ARGIRA I–III may partly arise from modeling the difference score:
Δ = OPRS − RTR
as a single target variable.
When analyzed independently, the two mappings display distinct predictive structures, indicating that they transform visual information into sound through different mechanisms.
CENTRAL FINDING
Two sonification mappings applied to the same image can preserve radically different visual characteristics and generate distinct predictive structures in the image-to-sound transformation process.
This reveals a measurable structural asymmetry between sonification mappings.
REPOSITORY CONTENTS
• experimento_argira4_oprs_vs_rtr.py — complete analysis pipeline
• dataset_canonico_86_v1.csv — canonical ARGIRA dataset
• argira4_resultados.csv — model performance metrics
• argira4_figura.png — summary visualization of the principal findings
• README.md — reproducibility documentation
REPRODUCIBILITY
Environment:
• Python 3.10+
• NumPy
• Pandas
• Scikit-learn
• Matplotlib
• SciPy
Run:
python experimento_argira4_oprs_vs_rtr.py
The script reproduces:
• Cross-validation results
• Correlation analyses
• Permutation tests
• Feature importance estimates
• Publication figures
RELATED ARGIRA DEPOSITS
ARGIRA I
Visual Predictors of Acoustic Perceptual Distance in Image Sonification
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20524644
ARGIRA II
From Correlation to Failure: Limits of Visual Feature Spaces in Predicting Perceptual Sonification Differences
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20526610
ARGIRA III
Systematic Representational Failure — LLM Semantic Descriptors Cannot Predict Perceptual Sonification Divergence
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20530682
AUTHOR
Jose Ranero García
ARGIRA Research Project
2026
Files
argira4_figura.png
Files
(382.4 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:f6e7e9c87f105b166c31bc564375643e
|
345.0 kB | Preview Download |
|
md5:36d675c9cfea98b427886c723eb24ec6
|
136 Bytes | Preview Download |
|
md5:59dc9c5e1df8fd32170524bbc26520a6
|
13.3 kB | Preview Download |
|
md5:fbcf9274a90ee60f27529ff576e52e00
|
18.2 kB | Download |
|
md5:24fa1f47a21c49b63cbaa690e27543e2
|
5.8 kB | Preview Download |