Vacuum Property Decomposition from the ADM–Plebański Factorisation: β and γ Separation, Shapiro–Deflection Asymmetry, and Near-Horizon Vacuum Structure
Description
The propagation of electromagnetic radiation through the gravitational field of a spherically symmetric mass is governed by the position-dependent optical properties of the vacuum. In isotropic Schwarzschild coordinates the Plebański refractive index,
n(r) = (1+x)³ / (1−x), x ≡ GM / 2rc²,
encodes those properties as a single scalar. The Arnowitt–Deser–Misner (ADM) 3+1 decomposition factorises this index into two physically distinct vacuum contributions,
n(r) = n_spatial × n_lapse = (1+x)² × (1+x)/(1−x),
where the spatial factor governs field-mode compression and the temporal factor governs gravitational time dilation. These are two physically separable aspects of the same medium's response to gravity, distinguishable in their observable consequences, and the decomposition makes their separate contributions to observable phenomena directly readable.
Five consequences of the decomposition are examined. (i) At first post-Newtonian (1PN) order the spatial and temporal vacuum properties contribute equally to light deflection and Shapiro delay, the algebraic consequence of γ = 1 in the Plebański framework. (ii) The parametrized post-Newtonian (PPN) refractive logarithm separates β and γ at each post-Newtonian order: γ is carried entirely by the spatial vacuum property, β entirely by the temporal. (iii) The temporal sector carries 4(1−β)x²; integrating along the straight-line path yields an r₁,r₂-independent 2PN temporal Shapiro excess
Δt²ᴾᴺ_lapse = π(1−β)G²M² / bc⁵,
providing a β-sensitive channel with natural observable 𝒮 = π(1−β), shown to exceed the δγ-limited systematic floor. (iv) At 2PN the spatial vacuum property contributes −(π/4)(GM/bc²)² to the deflection; path geometry contributes the remainder, giving the known +15π/4 × (GM/bc²)² total, confirmed self-consistently within the Plebański formalism. (v) Near the horizon the spatial vacuum property saturates and the temporal property diverges, a behaviour confirmed in Painlevé–Gullstrand coordinates.
We discuss how analogue-gravity systems offer a practical route to measuring 𝒮 where solar-system suppression renders direct measurement impractical. The analysis provides ontological clarity on the internal structure of the gravitational vacuum within the polarisable-vacuum programme.
Files
Zenodo-V4.pdf
Files
(416.8 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:fef793609d9d26328dcd3864da35acab
|
416.8 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Identifiers
Dates
- Updated
-
2026-06-03Preprint
References
- [1] - Gordon, W.: Zur Lichtfortpflanzung nach der Relativitätstheorie. Ann. Phys. 377, 421–456 (1923) https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.19233772202
- [2] H. A. Wilson. An electromagnetic theory of gravitation. Phys. Rev., 17:54–59, 1921. Early variable-permittivity derivation of gravitational light deflection; precursor to the Dicke–Puthoff programme.
- [3] J. Plebański. Electromagnetic waves in gravitational fields. Phys. Rev., 118:1396– 1408, 1960.
- [4] R. H. Dicke. Gravitation without a principle of equivalence. Rev. Mod. Phys., 29:363– 376, 1957.
- [5] J. Evans, K. K. Nandi, and A. Islam. The optical-mechanical analogy in general relativity: new methods for the paths of light and of the planets. Am. J. Phys., 64:1404–1415, 1996. Optical-mechanical analogy for light deflection and planetary orbits within standard GR.
- [6] H. E. Puthoff. Polarizable-vacuum (PV) approach to general relativity. Found. Phys., 32:927–943, 2002.
- [7] R. Arnowitt, S. Deser, and C. W. Misner. Republication of: The dynamics of general relativity. Gen. Relativ. Gravit., 40:1997–2027, 2008. Originally published in Phys. Rev. 116, 1322 (1959).
- [8] C. M. Will. Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1st edition, 1993.
- [9] M. Sereno. Gravitational lensing in metric theories of gravity using the optical scalar approach. Phys. Rev. D, 77:043004, 2008.
- [10] C. R. Keeton and A. O. Petters. Formalism for testing theories of gravity using lensing by compact objects. Phys. Rev. D, 73:044024, 2006.
- [11] C. M. Will. The confrontation between general relativity and experiment. Living Rev. Relativ., 17:4, 2014.
- [12] R. Epstein and I. I. Shapiro. Post-post-Newtonian deflection of light by the Sun. Phys. Rev. D, 22:2947–2949, 1980.
- [13] J. Bodenner and C. M. Will. Deflection of light to second post-Newtonian order: a tool for future experiments. Am. J. Phys., 71:770–773, 2003.
- [14] P. Schneider, J. Ehlers, and E. E. Falco. Gravitational Lenses. Springer, Berlin, 1992.
- [15] Antonio Genova, Erwan Mazarico, Sander Goossens, Frank G. Lemoine, Gregory A. Neumann, David E. Smith, and Maria T. Zuber. Solar system expansion and strong equivalence principle as seen by the NASA MESSENGER mission. Nat. Commun., 9:289, 2018.
- [16] B. Bertotti, L. Iess, and P. Tortora. A test of general relativity using radio links with the Cassini spacecraft. Nature, 425:374–376, 2003.
- [17] L. J. Garay, J. R. Anglin, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller. Sonic analogs of gravitational black holes in Bose–Einstein condensates. Phys. Rev. Lett., 85:4643–4647, 2000.
- [18] S. Weinfurtner, E. W. Tedford, M. C. J. Penrice, W. G. Unruh, and G. A. Lawrence. Measurement of stimulated Hawking emission in an analogue system. Phys. Rev. Lett., 106:021302, 2011.
- [19] Charles. W. Misner, Kip S. Thorne, and John A. Wheeler. Gravitation. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1973. Chapter 21 for ADM lapse and shift; Chapter 31 for proper-time interpretation of the lapse function; §23.1 for the Kretschmann scalar and its finiteness at the Schwarzschild horizon.
- [20] R. M. Wald. General Relativity. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1984. Chapter 10 for 3+1 decomposition and lapse function as ratio of proper time to coordinate time.
- [21] Erich Kretschmann. Über den physikalischen sinn der relativitätspostulate, a. ein- steins neue und seine ursprüngliche relativitätstheorie. Ann. Phys. (Berlin), 53:575– 614, 1917.
- [22] U. Leonhardt and T. G. Philbin. General relativity in electrical engineering. New J. Phys., 8:247, 2006. Transformation-optics perspective on effective-medium repre- sentation of curved spacetime; independent contemporary support for gravitational optical analogies.
- [23] W. G. Unruh. Notes on black-hole evaporation. Phys. Rev. D, 14:870–892, 1976.
- [24] S. W. Hawking. Particle creation by black holes. Commun. Math. Phys., 43:199–220, 1975.
- [25] W. G. Unruh. Experimental black-hole evaporation? Phys. Rev. Lett., 46:1351–1353, 1981.
- [26] C. Barceló, S. Liberati, and M. Visser. Analogue gravity. Living Rev. Relativ., 14:3, 2011. Comprehensive review of analogue-gravity systems and experimental programme.
- [27] U. Leonhardt and P. Piwnicki. Relativistic effects of light in moving media with extremely low group velocity. Phys. Rev. Lett., 84:822–825, 2000. Slow-light analogue gravity.