Published June 4, 2026 | Version v1.0

From Knowledge Storage to Knowledge Navigation: An Information-Structure-Based Model for Future Education in the AI Age

  • 1. ROR icon Jiangxi Science and Technology Normal University

Description

This working paper proposes a conceptual framework for redesigning education in the AI age by shifting from knowledge storage to knowledge navigation. It argues that modern knowledge has expanded beyond the realistic memorization capacity of individuals, while artificial intelligence and digital systems increasingly store, retrieve, compare, and update detailed information more effectively than human memory. The paper suggests that education should therefore focus less on training humans as containers of disciplinary content and more on developing their ability to understand, evaluate, connect, and transform knowledge.

The model introduces “informational structures” as recurring forms of reasoning that appear across disciplines, such as causality, systems, evidence, risk, uncertainty, human behavior, values, communication, design, and computation. It proposes that schools should teach these structures as universal foundations for understanding reality, while universities should offer advanced specialization pathways based on transferable informational structures applied across domains such as law, medicine, economics, public policy, AI, environment, business, and security.

Traditional disciplines are not rejected in this model. Instead, they are repositioned as application domains, case libraries, professional traditions, and testing environments where deeper structures of reasoning can be practiced. The paper also discusses the role of AI as memory infrastructure, the importance of human judgment and responsibility, the risks of over-abstraction and AI dependency, and a gradual roadmap for implementation through school modules, university minors, interdisciplinary degrees, AI-supported knowledge libraries, and redesigned professional certification.

The central claim is that the future of education should not ask humans to memorize civilization, but to understand, guide, and improve it.

Files

Files (164.8 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:4d8c14225a3629f54f6c01c91e839c8e
116.2 kB Download
md5:c61e8506bc7e3021eb217cfe7831bb13
48.7 kB Download

Additional details

Dates

Issued
2026-06-04
Publication date

References

  • Assmann, J. (2011). Cultural memory and early civilization: Writing, remembrance, and political imagination. Cambridge University Press.
  • Baddeley, A. (1992). Working memory. Science, 255(5044), 556–559.
  • Bawden, D., & Robinson, L. (2009). The dark side of information: Overload, anxiety and other paradoxes and pathologies. Journal of Information Science, 35(2), 180–191.
  • Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (Expanded ed.). National Academy Press.
  • Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.
  • Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58(1), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/58.1.7
  • Eppler, M. J., & Mengis, J. (2004). The concept of information overload: A review of literature from organization science, accounting, marketing, MIS, and related disciplines. The Information Society, 20(5), 325–344.
  • Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1881.001.0001
  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
  • National Research Council. (2014). Convergence: Facilitating transdisciplinary integration of life sciences, physical sciences, engineering, and beyond. National Academies Press.
  • Norman, D. A. (1993). Things that make us smart: Defending human attributes in the age of the machine. Addison-Wesley.
  • OECD. (2019). OECD Future of Education and Skills 2030: OECD Learning Compass 2030.
  • Perkins, D. N., & Salomon, G. (1992). Transfer of learning. In T. Husén & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of education (2nd ed.). Pergamon Press.
  • Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
  • Simon, H. A. (1971). Designing organizations for an information-rich world. In M. Greenberger (Ed.), Computers, communications, and the public interest (pp. 37–72). Johns Hopkins Press.
  • UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education.
  • World Economic Forum. (2025). The Future of Jobs Report 2025.