Assessing the Environmental, Humanitarian and Socio-Economic Impacts of Israeli Military Operations in Palestine: Is Israel in Violation of the Principles of Distinction, Proportionality, and Precaution?
Authors/Creators
- 1. College of Law, Bowen University, Iwo, Osun State, Nigeria
- 2. Faculty of Law, Kogi State University (now Prince Abubakar Audu University), Anyigba, Kogi State, Nigeria
- 3. Faculty of Law, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria
Description
The Israeli–Palestinian conflict remains one of the most protracted and complex disputes in
contemporary international relations. The current phase of hostilities commenced on 7 October
2023, when Hamas launched coordinated attacks against Israel, killing more than 1, 200 Israelis
and foreign nationals and abducting 253 hostages. In response, Israel declared war with the stated
objective of dismantling Hamas and asserting control over the Gaza Strip. A ceasefire agreement
mediated by the United States, Egypt, and Qatar was concluded on 15 January 2025 and
implemented on 19 January 2025. However, Israel resumed military operations on 17 March
2025, citing security concerns. A second ceasefire agreement, signed on 9 October 2025 and
effective from 10 October 2025, has reportedly been marred by continued Israeli hostilities, with
allegations of near-daily attacks resulting in significant Palestinian civilian casualties. This paper
adopts a doctrinal research method to evaluate the environmental, humanitarian, and socio
economic impacts of Israeli military operations in Palestine on the Palestinian people in the
ongoing Hamas-instigated Israeli-Palestinian armed conflict. It finds that Israeli military
campaign has produced extensive environmental degradation, severe humanitarian distress, and
profound socio-economic disruption in Palestine, particularly within the Gaza Strip. The paper
argues that the scale and pattern of these impacts raise serious concerns regarding compliance
with core principles of international humanitarian law–namely distinction, proportionality, and
precaution, which regulate the conduct of hostilities. It concludes by recommending sustained
diplomatic and political engagement by the international community, including the United
Nations, the United States, the European Union, and regional Arab states, to facilitate an end to
the armed conflict
Files
Recent Vol. 3, Issue 1, 2026, Bowen Law Journal_Final_33-62.pdf
Files
(2.0 MB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:3382e64ffaf70228daa53bee65757e30
|
2.0 MB | Preview Download |