Published June 3, 2026
| Version 1
Preprint
Open
The Poincaré Ball as a Geometric Output Space
Authors/Creators
Files
paper.pdf
Files
(1.3 MB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:4ab789136faca98759a0a38d202d50bd
|
1.3 MB | Preview Download |
Additional details
References
- 1. LeCun, Y., Chopra, S., Hadsell, R., Ranzato, M. A., & Huang, F. J. (2006). A tutorial on energy-based learning. In G. H. Bakır, T. Hofmann, B. Schölkopf, A. J. Smola, B. Taskar, & S. V. N. Vishwanathan (Eds.), *Predicting Structured Data*. MIT Press. 2. Grathwohl, W., Wang, K.-C., Jacobsen, J.-H., Duvenaud, D., Norouzi, M., & Swersky, K. (2020). Your classifier is secretly an energy based model and you should treat it like one. In *International Conference on Learning Representations*. 3. Gutmann, M., & Hyvärinen, A. (2010). Noise-contrastive estimation: A new estimation principle for unnormalized statistical models. In *Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics* (Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, Vol. 9, pp. 297–304). PMLR. 4. Hyvärinen, A. (2005). Estimation of non-normalized statistical models by score matching. *Journal of Machine Learning Research*, 6, 695–709. 5. Hinton, G. E. (2002). Training products of experts by minimizing contrastive divergence. *Neural Computation*, 14(8), 1771–1800. 6. Nickel, M., & Kiela, D. (2017). Poincaré embeddings for learning hierarchical representations. In *Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30*. 7. Ganea, O.-E., Bécigneul, G., & Hofmann, T. (2018). Hyperbolic neural networks. In *Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 31*. 8. Mathieu, E., Le Lan, C., Maddison, C. J., Tomioka, R., & Teh, Y. W. (2019). Continuous hierarchical representations with Poincaré variational auto-encoders. In *Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32*. 9. Bécigneul, G., & Ganea, O.-E. (2019). Riemannian adaptive optimization methods. In *International Conference on Learning Representations*. 10. Ovadia, Y., Fertig, E., Ren, J., Nado, Z., Sculley, D., Nowozin, S., Dillon, J. V., Lakshminarayanan, B., & Snoek, J. (2019). Can you trust your model's uncertainty? Evaluating predictive uncertainty under dataset shift. In *Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32*. 11. Guo, C., Pleiss, G., Sun, Y., & Weinberger, K. Q. (2017). On calibration of modern neural networks. In *Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning* (Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, Vol. 70, pp. 1321–1330). PMLR. 12. Zhang, H., Cissé, M., Dauphin, Y. N., & Lopez-Paz, D. (2018). mixup: Beyond empirical risk minimization. In *International Conference on Learning Representations*. 13. Müller, R., Kornblith, S., & Hinton, G. E. (2019). When does label smoothing help? In *Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32*. 14. Miyato, T., Kataoka, T., Koyama, M., & Yoshida, Y. (2018). Spectral normalization for generative adversarial networks. In *International Conference on Learning Representations*. 15. Gulrajani, I., Ahmed, F., Arjovsky, M., Dumoulin, V., & Courville, A. (2017). Improved training of Wasserstein GANs. In *Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30*. 16. Srivastava, N., Hinton, G., Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Salakhutdinov, R. (2014). Dropout: A simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. *Journal of Machine Learning Research*, 15, 1929–1958. 17. Ioffe, S., & Szegedy, C. (2015). Batch normalization: Accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift. In *Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Machine Learning* (Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, Vol. 37, pp. 448–456). PMLR. 18. Kermany, D., Zhang, K., & Goldbaum, M. (2018). Large dataset of labeled optical coherence tomography (OCT) and chest X-ray images (Version 3) [Data set]. Mendeley Data. https://doi.org/10.17632/rscbjbr9sj.3 19. Krizhevsky, A. (2009). Learning multiple layers of features from tiny images [CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100]. Technical report, University of Toronto.