Published June 1, 2026 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Seasonal variation in banteng density and habitat use across protected areas and buffer zones in western Thailand

  • 1. Department of Forest Biology, Faculty of Forestry, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand
  • 2. Department of Conservation, Faculty of Forestry, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand|Thai Long-Term Forest Ecological Research Project, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand
  • 3. Department of National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation, Bangkok, Thailand
  • 4. Thai Long-Term Forest Ecological Research Project, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand|Department of Forest Biology, Faculty of Forestry, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand

Description

Human-wildlife interactions in shared-use landscapes increasingly shape conservation outcomes for large herbivores, particularly where seasonal resource dynamics overlap with anthropogenic land use. In Thailand, the critically endangered banteng (Bos javanicus) persists within protected–buffer mosaics, where non-timber forest product (NTFP) collection and livestock grazing influence habitat use. We quantified seasonal variation in banteng density and habitat use within Huai Kha Khaeng Wildlife Sanctuary (HKK) and the adjacent Huai Thap Salao–Huai Khok Khwai National Forest using repeated dung-count surveys across 130 strip transects over seven periods. Results indicated a mean banteng density of 2.54 individuals/km2, exhibiting low seasonal fluctuations rather than a uniform annual pattern. Density peaked during the late rainy season (2.94 ± 0.56 individuals/km2) and reached its annual minimum during the mid-rainy season (2.00 ± 0.21 individuals/km2). Mixed-effect model evaluations supported the ecological hypothesis, identifying distance from protected area boundaries as the strongest predictor of density, highlighting the reliance on core protected forests. Anthropogenic factors significantly influenced temporal space use: banteng density within NTFP zones declined during intensive harvesting, while receding reservoir levels in the mid-dry season attracted high densities to drawdown grasslands as livestock presence reduced. Our findings demonstrate that, while forest composition dictates initial habitat use, anthropogenic pressures and fire frequency act as dynamic disturbances that strictly necessitate seasonally adaptive conservation strategies. We emphasise the need for seasonally adaptive management, including the regulation of NTFP harvesting during peak periods and the strict prohibition of livestock in dry-season refuges. Furthermore, we propose transitioning from extractive land use to sustainable wildlife tourism near reservoir boundaries to enhance community livelihoods, while ensuring the long-term persistence of this vital banteng habitat.

Files

NC_article_184399.pdf

Files (5.5 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:0819c2390e853dc87916bf37d4812a4e
5.3 MB Preview Download
md5:06469959f93b3356026cd348d3da5fff
143.3 kB Preview Download

Linked records

Additional details

References

  • Amorntiyangkul P, Jornburom P, Pattanavibool A, Suksavate W, Klanprasert S, Kaewvisat S, Thongthai T (2024) First dispersal records of the endangered banteng (Bos javanicus) in Thung Yai Naresuan West Wildlife Sanctuary, Thailand. Ecology and Evolution 14: e11602. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.11602
  • Bailey RE, Putman RJ (1981) Estimation of fallow deer (Dama dama) Populations from Faecal Accumulation. Journal of Applied Ecology 18(3): 697–702. https://doi.org/10.2307/2402361
  • Bartoń K (2024) MuMIn: Multi-Model Inference. R package version 1.48.11. https://doi.org/10.32614/cran.package.mumin
  • Bennett LJ, English PF, McCain R (1940) A study of deer populations by use of pellet-group counts. The Journal of Wildlife Management 4(4): 398–403. https://doi.org/10.2307/3796010
  • Buckland ST, Rexstad EA, Marques TA, Oedekoven CS (2015) Distance Sampling: Methods and Applications. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19219-2
  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach. Springer, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/b97636
  • Cade BS (2015) Model averaging and muddled multimodel inferences. Ecology 96: 2370–2382. https://doi.org/10.1890/14-1639.1
  • Campbell D, Swanson GM, Sales J (2004) Comparing the precision and cost-effectiveness of faecal pellet group count methods. Journal of Applied Ecology 41(6): 1185–1196. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00964.x
  • Chaiyarat R, Srikosamatara S (2009) Populations of domesticated cattle and buffalo in the Western Forest Complex of Thailand and their possible impacts on the wildlife community. Journal of Environmental Management 90(3): 1448–1453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.09.004
  • Chaiyarat R, Sakchan P, Panprayun G, Thongthip N, Nakbun S (2020) Monitoring of forage and nutrition before and after reintroduction of banteng (Bos javanicus d'Alton, 1823) to Salakphra Wildlife Sanctuary, Thailand. Scientific Reports 10(1): e11135. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67942-2
  • Chaiyarat R, Ingudomnukul P, Yimphrai N, Nakbun S, Youngpoy N (2023) The preferred habitat of reintroduced banteng (Bos javanicus) at the core and the edge of Salakphra Wildlife Sanctuary, Thailand. Animals 13(14): e2293. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13142293
  • Chankhao A, Kraichak E, Phumsathan S, Pongpattananurak N (2022) Dynamics of forage and management implications for large herbivore habitat in seasonally dry forest of Southeast Asia. Forests 13(9): e1463. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13091463
  • Chankhao A, Kongmun P, Kraichak E, Phumsathan S, Pongpattananurak N (2025) Time-dependence of forage quality for large herbivores in seasonally dry tropical forests, Western Thailand. Journal of Wildlife Management 90. https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.70135
  • Department of National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation, Faculty of Forestry, Kasetsart University, WWF-Thailand (2024) Beautiful Banteng: Iconic rarity of lowland forests. WWF-Thailand, Bangkok. https://wwffoundation.org/3d-flip-book/banteng/
  • Duangmullee N, Ngoprasert D, Gale G, Sukumal N, Duangchantrasiri S, Vijittrakoolchai C, Tantipisanuh N (2025) Assessing banteng recovery in west-central Thailand using camera-trapping based spatially explicit mark–resight with natural marking. Wildlife Research 52. https://doi.org/10.1071/WR25103
  • Eberhardt L, Van Etten RC (1956) Evaluation of the pellet group count as a deer census method. The Journal of Wildlife Management 20(1): 70–74. https://doi.org/10.2307/3797250
  • Fornacca D, Ren G, Xiao W (2018) Evaluating the best spectral indices for the detection of burn scars at several post-fire dates in a mountainous region of northwest Yunnan, China. Remote Sensing 10(8): e1196. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10081196
  • Gardner P, Hedges S, Pudyatmoko S, Gray TNE, Timmins RJ (2016) Bos javanicus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016: e.T2888A46362970. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-2.RLTS.T2888A46362970.en
  • Gardner PC, Vaughan IP, Liew LP, Goossens B (2019) Using natural marks in a spatially explicit capture–recapture framework to estimate preliminary population density of cryptic endangered wild cattle in Borneo. Global Ecology and Conservation 20: e00748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00748
  • Gray TNE, Prum S, Pin C, Phan C (2012) Distance sampling reveals Cambodia's Eastern Plains landscape supports the largest global population of the endangered banteng Bos javanicus. Oryx 46(4): 563–566. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605312000567
  • Groenenberg M, Gray TNE (2025) Bos javanicus (amended version of 2024 assessment). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2025: e.T2888A270543638. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2025-1.RLTS.T2888A270543638.en
  • Hedges S, Lawson D (2006) Dung survey standards for the MIKE Programme. CITES MIKE Programme, Central Coordinating Unit, PO Box 68200, Nairobi, Kenya. https://cites.org/sites/default/files/common/prog/mike/survey/dung_standards.pdf
  • Hedges S (2012) Monitoring elephant populations and assessing threats: a manual for researchers, managers and conservationists. Universities Press (India) Private Limited, Himayatnagar, Hyderabad, India.
  • Huai Kha Khaeng Wildlife Sanctuary (2018) Annual Report. Department of National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation, Bangkok, Thailand. [In Thai]
  • Huai Kha Khaeng Wildlife Sanctuary (2019) Annual Report. Department of National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation, Bangkok, Thailand. [In Thai]
  • Huai Kha Khaeng Wildlife Sanctuary (2020) Annual Report. Department of National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation, Bangkok, Thailand. [In Thai]
  • Huai Kha Khaeng Wildfire Research (2019) Annual Meteorological Data Report 2019. Department of National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation, Bangkok, Thailand. [In Thai]
  • Jitpaya A, Duengkae P, Duangchantrasiri S, Jornburom P, Sornsa M, Suksavate W (2025) Co-occurrence and spatio–temporal niche overlap between banteng (Bos javanicus) and gaur (Bos gaurus) in Huai Kha Khaeng Wildlife Sanctuary, Thailand. Ecologica Montenegrina 91: 75–94. https://doi.org/10.37828/em.2025.91.10
  • Johnson LA (2006) Fire, seasonally dry evergreen forest and conservation, Huai Kha Khaeng Wildlife Sanctuary, Thailand. PhD dissertation, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada. https://hdl.handle.net/1828/68
  • Jornburom P (2016) The distribution of elephants, tigers and tiger prey in Thailand's Western Forest Complex. PhD dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA. https://hdl.handle.net/11299/202182
  • Jornburom P, Duangchantrasiri S, Jinamoy S, Pattanavibool A, Hines J, Arnold T, Fieberg J, Smith J (2020) Habitat use by tiger prey in Thailand's Western Forest Complex: what will it take to fill a half-full tiger landscape? Journal for Nature Conservation 58: 125896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2020.125896
  • Jotikapukkana S, Berg Å, Pattanavibool A (2010) Wildlife and human use of buffer-zone areas in a wildlife sanctuary. Wildlife Research 37: 466–474. https://doi.org/10.1071/WR09132
  • Krebs CJ (1999) Ecological Methodology (2nd edn.). Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers, Menlo Park, California, USA.
  • Land Development Department (2018) Land use classification map of Uthai Thani Province 2018. Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives, Bangkok, Thailand.
  • McCullagh P, Nelder JA (1989) Generalized Linear Models. Chapman and Hall, Boca Raton, Florida, USA. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203753736
  • McShea WJ, Sukmasuang R, Erickson DL, Herrmann V, Ngoprasert D, Bhumpakphan N, Davies SJ (2019) Metabarcoding reveals diet diversity in an ungulate community in Thailand. Biotropica 51(6): 923–937. https://doi.org/10.1111/btp.12720
  • Merz G (1986) Counting elephants (Loxodonta africana cyclotis) in tropical rain forests with particular reference to the Taï National Park, Ivory Coast. African Journal of Ecology 24(2): 61–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2028.1986.tb00344.x
  • Mohanarangan A, Chinnaiyan S, Kaliyaperumal S, Shanmugavelu S, Desai A (2022) Age-specific differences in Asian elephant defecation, dung decay, detection and their implication for dung count. Ecological Solutions and Evidence 3: e12145. https://doi.org/10.1002/2688-8319.12145
  • Neff DJ (1968) The pellet-group count technique for big game trend, census, and distribution: A review. The Journal of Wildlife Management 32(3): 597–614. https://doi.org/10.2307/3798941
  • Phoonjampa R, Steinmetz R, Phumanee W, Bunchornratana K, Kaewsrisod T, Srirattanaporn S, Taraphibarl K, Bejraburnin T, Bhumpakphan N (2021) Recolonization of former range by endangered banteng Bos javanicus in Mae Wong National Park, Thailand. Tropical Conservation Science 14: e194008292110653. https://doi.org/10.1177/19400829211065359
  • Phumsathan S, Daonurai K, Kraichak E, Sungkaew S, Teerawatananon A, Pongpattananurak N (2022a) Effects of Fire on diversity and aboveground biomass of understory communities in seasonally dry tropical forest in western Thailand. Sustainability 14: e15067. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215067
  • Phumsathan S, Pongpattananurak N, Udomwitid S, Chaisawataree T, Kraichak E, Sungkaew S (2022b) Research for strengthening government policy in buffer zone management in the establishing area of Huai Thab Salao – Huai Ra Bam non-hunting area, Uthai Thani Province. Final report. National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA), Bangkok, Thailand.
  • Phumsathan S, Thongwijit K, Simcharoen A, Suksavate W, Kraichak E, Chankhao A, Pongpattananurak N (2024) Factors affecting habitat use of Asian elephants for buffer zone management and conservation of the Huai Kha Khaeng World Heritage Site, Thailand. Global Ecology and Conservation 56: e03302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2024.e03302
  • Phumsathan S, Pongpattananurak N, Udomwitid S, Chaisawasaree T, Chotiwuttakorn K, Kraichak E, Chaiyarat R, Tunhikorn S, Waipanya S, Simcharoen A (2025) Strategies and policy recommendations for sustainable wildlife tourism management in the area of Huai Thap Salao – Huai Rabam Development Project, Uthai Thani Province. Faculty of Forestry, Kasetsart University, Bangkok. [In Thai]
  • Pin C, Ngoprasert D, Gray TNE, Savini T, Crouthers R, Gale GA (2020) Utilization of waterholes by globally threatened species in deciduous dipterocarp forest of the Eastern Plains Landscape of Cambodia. Oryx 54(4): 572–582. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605318000455
  • Pla-ard M, Sukmasuang R, Srinopawan K (2019) Population characteristics and habitat suitability of Asian elephants (Elephas maximus Linnaeus, 1758) in the Khao Yai National Park, Thailand. European Journal of Ecology 5(2): 62–71. https://doi.org/10.2478/eje-2019-0012
  • Plumptre A (2001) Monitoring mammal populations with line transect techniques in African forests. Journal of Applied Ecology 37: 356–368. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2664.2000.00499.x
  • Pongpattananurak N (2020) Wildlife habitat management plan for Nang Ram Valley and the Thap Salao Valley in Huai Kha Khaeng Wildlife Sanctuary and Thap Salao Forest – Huai Khok Kwai National Forest. Faculty of Forestry. Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand. [In Thai]
  • Prayurasithi T (1987) Ecology of banteng in Huai Kha Khaeng Wildlife Sanctuary. MSc thesis, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
  • QGIS Development Team (2024) QGIS Geographic Information System. Open-Source Geospatial Foundation Project. https://qgis.org
  • R Core Team (2024) R: A language for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.r-project.org/
  • Rahman DA, Herliansyah R, Rianti P, Rahmat UM, Firdaus AY, Syamsudin M (2019) Ecology and conservation of the endangered banteng (Bos javanicus) in Indonesia tropical lowland forest. HAYATI Journal of Biosciences 26(2): 68–75. https://doi.org/10.4308/hjb.26.2.68
  • Rahman DA (2020) Ecological niche and potential distribution of the endangered Bos javanicus in south-western Java, Indonesia. Therya 11(1): 57–68. https://doi.org/10.12933/therya-20-840
  • Ripley BD (2025) MASS: Support functions and datasets for Venables and Ripley's MASS (version 7.3-65). https://doi.org/10.32614/cran.package.mass
  • Saisamorn A, Duangchantrasiri S, Sornsa M, Suksavate W, Pattanavibool A, Duengkae P (2024) Recovery of globally threatened ungulate species in Huai Kha Khaeng Wildlife Sanctuary, Thailand. Global Ecology and Conservation 53: e03012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2024.e03012
  • Simcharoen A, Savini T, Gale GA, Roche E, Chimchome V, Smith JLD (2014a) Ecological factors that influence sambar (Rusa unicolor) distribution and abundance in western Thailand: Implications for tiger conservation. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 62: 100–106. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5353426
  • Simcharoen A, Savini T, Gale G, Simcharoen S, Duangchantrasiri S, Pakpien S, Smith J (2014b) Female tiger Panthera tigris home range size and prey abundance: Important metrics for management. Oryx 48: 370–377. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605312001408
  • Smith J, Simchareon S, Simcharoen A, Cutter P, Gurung B, Chundawat R, McDougal C, Seidensticker J (2011) Seasonally dry tropical forest is essential tiger habitat. In: Tilson R, Nyhus PJ (Eds) Tigers of the World: The Science, Politics, and Conservation of Panthera tigris (2nd edn.). Academic Press, London, 237–247.
  • Srikosamatara S (1993) Density and biomass of large herbivores and other mammals in a dry tropical forest, western Thailand. Journal of Tropical Ecology 9(1): 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026646740000691X
  • Srikrajang M, Srikosamatara S (2006) Monitoring changes in density and distribution of large herbivores between 1988 and 2005 in Khao Nang Ram Wildlife Research Station and adjacent Huai Kha Khaeng Wildlife Sanctuary, Uthai Thani Province. Research reports and progress summaries of wildlife research, fiscal year 2005. Department of National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation, Bangkok, Thailand. [In Thai]
  • Steinmetz R (2004) Gaur (Bos gaurus) and Banteng (B. javanicus) in the lowland forest mosaic of Xe Pian protected area, Lao PDR: Abundance, habitat use, and conservation. Mammalia 68(2–3): 141–157. https://doi.org/10.1515/mamm.2004.015
  • Steinmetz R, Chutipong W, Seuaturien N (2006) Collaborating to conserve large mammals in southeast Asia. Conservation Biology 20(5): 1391–1401. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00505.x
  • Sutherland WJ (2006) Ecological Census Techniques: A Handbook (2nd edn.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511790508
  • Tejaswi G (2007) Manual on Deforestation, Degradation, and Fragmentation Using Remote Sensing and GIS. Forestry Department, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Italy.
  • Varma S (2008) Spatial distribution of Asian elephant (Elephas maximus) and its habitat usage pattern in Kalakad-Mundanthurai Tiger Reserve, Western Ghats, southern India. Current Science 94: 113–120. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24101996
  • Waiprom L, Klinhom S, Pattanavibool A, Simcharoen S (2016) The new distribution and suitable area of banteng (Bos javanicus) in Salawin Wildlife Sanctuary. Journal of Wildlife in Thailand 23(1): 53–62. [In Thai]
  • Wahyudi HA, Kurniawati DA, Supriyanto S, Sutadi S (2016) Habitat overlap between banteng (Bos javanicus javanicus) and domestic cattle in Baluran National Park, East Java. Journal of Indonesian Natural History 4(2): 35–40.
  • Whittingham MJ, Stephens PA, Bradbury RB, Freckleton RP (2006) Why do we still use stepwise modelling in ecology and behaviour? Journal of Animal Ecology 75(5): 1182–1189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01141.x
  • Wiles G (1980) Faeces deterioration rates of four wild ungulates in Thailand. Natural History Bulletin of the Siam Society 28: 121–134. https://thesiamsociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/NHBSS_028_j_Wiles_FaecesDeterioratio.pdf
  • Wohlfart C, Wegmann M, Leimgruber P (2014) Mapping threatened dry deciduous dipterocarp forest in South-East Asia for conservation management. Tropical Conservation Science 7: 597–613. https://doi.org/10.1177/194008291400700402