Biodiversity Literature Repository

Submit to community
Liberated Data
Published December 25, 2025 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Student Engagement As A Mediator Between Curriculum Design, Instructional Resource Quality, And Student Performance

Authors/Creators

Description

Xiangshun, Wang, Abstract, Chandra Mohan Vasudeva Panicker (2025): Student Engagement As A Mediator Between Curriculum Design, Instructional Resource Quality, And Student Performance. FishTaxa 36 (9): 474-479, DOI: 10.64149/fishtaxa.36.1s.474-479, URL: https://fishtaxa.com/index.php/FishTaxa/article/view/275

Files

source.pdf

Files (358.7 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:4a55bc7f5cf9b1048919fa6e5fc9dbbd
358.7 kB Preview Download

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:4A55BC7FFFF9B1048919FA6EFFC9FFBD

Related works

Cites
Publication: 10.1002/pits.20303 (DOI)

References

  • 1. Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., & Furlong, M. J. (2008). Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5), 369-386. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20303
  • 2. Benabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2016). Mindful economics: The production, consumption, and value of beliefs. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 30(3), 141-164.
  • 3. Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
  • 4. Bond, M., Bedenlier, S., Marin, V. I., & Handel, M. (2020). Emergency remote teaching in higher education: Mapping the first global online semester. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 1-24.
  • 5. Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97-140.
  • 6. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109.
  • 7. Harden, R. M. (2001). AMEE Guide No. 21: Curriculum mapping: A tool for transparent and authentic teaching and learning. Medical Teacher, 23(2), 123-137.
  • 8. Hattie, J. (2015). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
  • 9. Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review, 27, 1-12.
  • 10. Kahu, E. R. (2013). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38(5), 758-773.
  • 11. Mayer, R. E. (2014). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed., pp. 43-71). Cambridge University Press.
  • 12. Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. (2007). Interactive multimodal learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19(3), 309- 326.
  • 13. OECD. (2021). Education at a glance 2021: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing.
  • 14. Priestley, M., & Biesta, G. (2013). Reinventing the curriculum: New trends in curriculum policy and practice. Bloomsbury.
  • 15. Reeve, J. (2012). A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. In S. L. Christenson et al. (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 149-172). Springer.
  • 16. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860.
  • 17. Schmidt, W. H., Wang, H. C., & McKnight, C. C. (2001). Curriculum coherence: An examination of US mathematics and science content standards. Educational Researcher, 30(5), 3-12.
  • 18. Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, 101832.
  • 19. Selwyn, N. (2016). Education and technology: Key issues and debates. Bloomsbury Academic.
  • 20. Sinatra, G. M., Heddy, B. C., & Lombardi, D. (2015). The challenges of defining and measuring student engagement. Educational Psychologist, 50(1), 1-13.
  • 21. Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., & Furrer, C. J. (2009). A motivational perspective on engagement and disaffection. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69(3), 493-525.
  • 22. Trowler, V. (2010). Student engagement literature review. Higher Education Academy.
  • 23. UNESCO. (2022). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UNESCO Publishing.
  • 24. Voogt, J., Pieters, J., & Handelzalts, A. (2018). Teacher collaboration in curriculum design teams. Educational Research and Evaluation, 24(5-6), 251-273.
  • 25. World Bank. (2021). The state of the global education crisis: A path to recovery. World Bank.
  • 26. Young, M. (2013). Overcoming the crisis in curriculum theory. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45(2), 101-118.
  • 27. Zepke, N. (2018). Student engagement in neo-liberal times. Higher Education, 76(4), 693-708.