Published May 27, 2026 | Version 4

A Cycle-Projection Ontology of Mass, Distance, and Structure: From Atomic Boundaries to Galactic Halos

  • 1. Independent Scholar

Description

This paper develops a cycle-projection framework whose central purpose is to separate physical process from observational chart. Standard physics often begins from observables already separated into mass, distance, field, force, particle, and spacetime. Here, these quantities are treated as regime-dependent readings of a single underlying process: a boundary-cycle irruption characterized by one full-cycle action \(h\), one cycle period \(T_p\), and one propagation length \(L_p=cT_p\).

The primitive cycle energy is
\[
E_{\rm tot}=\frac{h}{T_p}.
\]
Physical distance is defined operationally by cycle-counted propagation, while the Aiónic projection variable \(x\) denotes the effective number of primitive cycle-energy units composing the structure. The central energy partition is 
\[
E=\frac{h}{T_p}x =E_{\rm core}+m_{\rm obs}c^2.
\]
As a concrete consequence, the proton radius is obtained as the Euclidean projection of the non-observable \(E_{\rm core}\) boundary:
\[
r_p^{\rm eucl}
=
\frac{2}{\pi}\frac{h}{m_pc}
=
0.841235641483\ {\rm fm},
\]
while the observed proton mass is the asymptotic projection extending from that boundary toward infinity.
Thus Einstein's mass--energy relation is retained as the observable projected sector, but it is not identified with the full ontological energy. The missing sector is the confined core reservoir.

Within this framework, Euclidean geometry is retained only as a weak-field observational chart, and Maxwellian field-current dynamics is the mechanism by which projected structure becomes physically manifest. Matter is therefore modeled not as an ensemble of point-like corpuscles, but as boundary-active field-current structure with observable centers, extended projections, and regime-dependent closure.

The same grammar is applied across scales. In the atomic and nuclear regimes, electronic modes are treated as boundary-coupled closures rather than primitive point particles. In the gravitational regime, Newtonian dynamics is recovered in weak field, the Mercury correction appears as the first nonlinear near-source residue of shared projected energy, and halo-like behavior is interpreted as a large-radius regime of projected mass rather than as an immediately separate matter ontology.

The framework treats established physics as a high-precision observational map, not as a target for rejection. Its central methodological claim is that reproducible observables are stable outputs of process--lens couplings, not automatically ontological primitives.
The task of the theory is therefore to recover the physical process beneath the observational charts.

Files

Aion_physics 20260527.pdf

Files (567.0 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:c4418c5b8ea74f0da20b5b45498c1ace
567.0 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • [1] Maxwell, J. C. (1865). "A Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field." Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 155, 459-512. [2] Planck, M. (1901). "On the Law of Distribution of Energy in the Normal Spectrum." Annalen der Physik, 4, 553-563. [3] Einstein, A. (1905). "Does the Inertia of a Body Depend Upon Its Energy-Content?" Annalen der Physik, 18, 639-641. [4] Newton, I. (1687). "Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica." London. [5] Einstein, A. (1915). "Explanation of the Perihelion Motion of Mercury from General Relativity." Sitzungsberichte der Königlich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 831-839. [6] Schrödinger, E. (1926). "Quantisierung als Eigenwertproblem." Annalen der Physik, 79, 361-376, 489-527, 734-756. [7] Heisenberg, W. (1927). "Über den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik und Mechanik." Zeitschrift für Physik, 43, 172-198. [8] Dirac, P. A. M. (1928). "The Quantum Theory of the Electron." Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 117, 610-624. [9] Pauli, W. (1925). "Über den Zusammenhang des Abschlusses der Elektronengruppen im Atom mit der Komplexstruktur der Spektren." Zeitschrift für Physik, 31, 765-783. [10] Rutherford, E. (1920). "Nuclear Constitution of Atoms." Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 97, 374. [11] Chadwick, J. (1932). "The Existence of a Neutron." Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 136, 692-708. [12] Wheeler, J. A. (1962). "Geometrodynamics." Academic Press, New York. [13] Wheeler, J. A. (1990). "Information, Physics, Quantum: The Search for Links." In W. H. Zurek (Ed.), Complexity, Entropy, and the Physics of Information. Addison-Wesley. [14] Rubin, V. C., Ford Jr., W. K., & Thonnard, N. (1980). "Rotational Properties of 21 SC Galaxies with a Large Range of Luminosities and Radii." Astrophysical Journal, 238, 471-487. [15] Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. (1997). "A Universal Density Profile from Hierarchical Clustering." Astrophysical Journal, 490, 493-508. [16] Jackson, J. D. (1999). "Classical Electrodynamics" (3rd ed.). Wiley, New York. [17] Griffiths, D. J. (2017). "Introduction to Electrodynamics" (4th ed.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.