Published May 26, 2026 | Version 1.2

Using AI Without Losing Thinking: A Guide to Structured Inquiry, Visible Reasoning, & Prompt Engineering A Pedagogical Philosophy of AI-Mediated Reasoning

  • 1. ROR icon Florida Institute of Technology

Description

Using AI Without Losing Thinking presents a practical and theoretical framework for integrating generative AI into higher education without reducing learning to output production. The guide argues that the central instructional problem is not whether students use AI, but whether their reasoning remains visible enough to evaluate. It introduces a method of structured AI-supported inquiry in which AI responses are treated as provisional material for examination, comparison, revision, and justification rather than as finished answers.

The framework centers on visible reasoning, Levels of AI Engagement, Core Reference Extracts (CREs), assignment redesign, selected interaction excerpts, inquiry continuity methods, failure-mode diagnosis, and instructor evaluation. It provides both conceptual grounding and classroom-ready tools for instructors who want students to use AI while still engaging assigned course material, testing assumptions, generating alternatives, comparing interpretations, and defending conclusions. The guide is intended for college instructors across disciplines and is accompanied by a mobile-optimized student-facing version for direct classroom implementation.

Notes

Version 1.2 substantially expands and refines the guide as a public-facing instructor resource. This version strengthens the author note, expertise statement, scope statement, acknowledgements, and writing-style statement; clarifies the relationship between the guide’s independently developed classroom framework and named prompting methods from existing AI research; and more explicitly frames the guide as a practice-based model grounded in assignment design, classroom observation, and iterative implementation.

The main guide has been revised to sharpen the distinction between AI-generated output and visible student reasoning, clarify the Levels of Engagement, strengthen the role of the Core Reference Extract (CRE), and better connect assignment design, AI interaction, failure diagnosis, and instructor evaluation. Version 1.2 also expands the appendices as a practical reference system, including assignment models, evaluation guidance, student-facing explanations, course-level kernels, persistent constraints, Inquiry Continuity Summaries, inquiry-diagnosis methods, and prompting architectures. Additional attention is given to ethical responsibility, AI detection risks, privacy, power, and the need to evaluate what students do with AI rather than what AI produces.

This version also includes a two-page instructor brief designed for conference distribution and quick classroom adoption. The brief summarizes the core method, Levels of Engagement, Core Reference Extract, assignment conversion process, and practical grading questions, and links readers to the full instructor guide and mobile student-facing guide.

Files

Jones_Using_AI_Without_Losing_Thinking_Instructor_Brief.pdf

Files (1.6 MB)

Name Size
md5:8cc0915cded41b7caa0528508df38009
317.9 kB Preview Download
md5:9da8d351d9da70e75fbf04d29c5e12b9
1.3 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Additional titles

Subtitle
A practical and theoretical guide to using generative AI as a tool for structured inquiry and visible reasoning in higher education pedagogies.

Related works

Is supplemented by
Report: 10.5281/zenodo.20208788 (DOI)

Dates

Copyrighted
2016-05-15