Published May 26, 2026 | Version 4.2

FEIK Protocol v4.2: Semantic Security Extension

Authors/Creators

Description

This paper introduces Semantic Security as a FEIK Protocol extension for evaluating meaning-level risk in public language, AI systems, institutional documents, strategies, reports, and organizational self-descriptions. Traditional cybersecurity focuses on unauthorized access, data leakage, signal interception, and system compromise. Semantic Security expands the threat model to the level of meaning: how language frames risk, distributes responsibility, conceals uncertainty, launders authority, and alters the observer’s ability to detect what is happening.

The central claim is that in AI-mediated societies, language itself becomes part of the attack surface. A system can remain technically secure while becoming semantically unsafe if its language causes users, citizens, workers, or decision-makers to misread power, uncertainty, harm, responsibility, or legitimacy. FEIK v4.2 therefore defines the Epistemic Shitfilter as a form of semantic cryptanalysis: a method for detecting when a claim has been encrypted into acceptable, neutral, safe, responsible, strategic, or humane language while its underlying structure remains unexamined.

The paper defines semantic security, semantic breach, semantic encryption, plaintext/ciphertext/key analysis, semantic attack surfaces, failure modes, a semantic Phi-gate, contamination scoring adaptations, and a semantic cryptanalysis procedure. It positions Semantic Security not as a replacement for technical cybersecurity, but as an extension of security thinking into language, interpretation, institutional communication, and AI-mediated epistemology.

Notes

This is a working paper in the FEIK Protocol / Epistemic Shitfilter series. It introduces Semantic Security as an exploratory framework for meaning-level risk analysis. The method is not a validated measurement instrument and does not claim to determine absolute truth or intent. Contamination scores, if used, should be treated as pressure maps rather than truth judgments. The framework is intended for claim analysis, institutional language critique, AI-output evaluation, teaching, journalism, organizational self-audit, and methodological development.

Files

FEIK_Protocol_v4_2_Semantic_Security_Extension.pdf

Files (193.3 kB)