Published May 22, 2026 | Version v1
Journal article Open

A comprehensive phylogenomic framework for cycads (Cycadales)

  • 1. Montgomery Botanical Center, Coral Gables, United States of America
  • 2. Montgomery Botanical Center, Coral Gables, United States of America|Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Penrith, Australia
  • 3. SENCKENBERG – Leibniz Institution for Biodiversity and Earth System Research (SGN), Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany

Description

Here we present a time-calibrated phylogeny of 346 cycad accessions, covering ≈86% of the 380 accepted species, across all 10 extant genera, inferred from 1,409 single-copy nuclear loci (411,345 amino acid sites) derived from transcriptome and genome data. The maximum likelihood phylogeny was inferred using a partitioned analysis, with branch support assessed via ultrafast bootstrap (UFBoot2), and concordance evaluated using gene concordance factors (gCF) and site concordance factors (sCF), representing gene- and site-level support, respectively. Divergence times were estimated using penalized likelihood (TreePL) with 12 calibration constraints, and 95% confidence intervals were derived from 100 gene-wise bootstrap replicates. Bootstrap support is high (70% of nodes ≥95%), but gene concordance factors are low (median gCF = 3.2%), a pattern consistent with limited phylogenetic signal per locus rather than strong support for alternative topologies. Across all 10 genera, the phylogram recovered a strongly supported generic backbone, confirmed the monophyly of all genera, and provides the first broadly accessible phylogenomic framework for interpreting cycad taxonomy, intergeneric relationships, and evolutionary history. Herein, we provide the phylogram, timetree, all 1,409 gene trees, the concatenated alignment with partition definitions, and associated support, confidence-interval, and calibration data.

Files

PK_article_194283.pdf

Files (1.7 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:a29292ac9866babb1b8396420932972c
1.6 MB Preview Download
md5:cba3f704fc8f702bd7a0c188a5101f0f
98.4 kB Preview Download

Linked records

Additional details

References

  • Calonje M, Meerow AW, Griffith MP, Salas-Leiva D, Vovides AP, Coiro M, Francisco-Ortega J (2019) A time-calibrated species tree phylogeny of the New World cycad genus Zamia L. (Zamiaceae, Cycadales). International Journal of Plant Sciences 180(4): 286–314. https://doi.org/10.1086/702642
  • Calonje M, Stevenson DW, Osborne R (2026) The World List of Cycads (Version 2026.03.10). Montgomery Botanical Center, Coral Gables, FL. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18940728
  • Capella-Gutiérrez S, Silla-Martínez JM, Gabaldon T (2009) trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 25(15): 1972–1973. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp348
  • Coiro M, Seyfullah LJ (2024) Disparity of cycad leaves dispels the living fossil metaphor. Communications Biology 7: 328. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-024-06024-9
  • Coiro M, Allio R, Mazet N, Seyfullah LJ, Condamine FL (2023) Reconciling fossils with phylogenies reveals the origin and macroevolutionary processes explaining the global cycad biodiversity. New Phytologist 240(4): 1616–1635. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.19010
  • Condamine FL, Nagalingum NS, Marshall CR, Morlon H (2015) Origin and diversification of living cycads: a cautionary tale on the impact of the branching process prior in Bayesian molecular dating. BMC Evolutionary Biology 15: 65. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-015-0347-8
  • De La Torre AR, Li Z, van de Peer Y, Ingvarsson PK (2017) Contrasting rates of molecular evolution and patterns of selection among gymnosperms and flowering plants. Molecular Biology and Evolution 34(6): 1363–1377. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msx069
  • Elgorriaga A, Atkinson BA (2023) Cretaceous pollen cone with three-dimensional preservation sheds light on the morphological evolution of cycads in deep time. New Phytologist 238(4): 1695–1710. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.18852
  • Emms DM, Kelly S (2019) OrthoFinder: phylogenetic orthology inference for comparative genomics. Genome Biology 20(1): 238. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-019-1832-y
  • Grabherr MG, Haas BJ, Yassour M, Levin JZ, Thompson DA, Amit I, Adiconis X, Fan L, Raychowdhury R, Zeng Q, Chen Z, Mauceli E, Hacohen N, Gnirke A, Rhind N, di Palma F, Birren BW, Nusbaum C, Lindblad-Toh K, Friedman N, Regev A (2011) Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nature Biotechnology 29(7): 644–652. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1883
  • Gutiérrez-Ortega JS, Pérez-Farrera MA, Sato MP, Matsuo A, Suyama Y, Vovides AP, Molina-Freaner F, Kajita T, Watano Y (2024) Evolutionary and ecological trends in the Neotropical cycad genus Dioon (Zamiaceae): an example of success of evolutionary stasis. Ecological Research 39(2): 131–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1703.12442
  • Haas BJ, Papanicolaou A, Yassour M, Grabherr M, Blood PD, Bowden J, Couger MB, Eccles D, Li B, Lieber M, MacManes MD, Ott M, Orvis J, Pocber N, Strozzi F, Weeks N, Westerman R, William T, Dewey CN, Henschel R, LeDuc RD, Friedman N, Regev A (2013) De novo transcript sequence reconstruction from RNA-seq using the Trinity platform for reference generation and analysis. Nature Protocols 8(8): 1494–1512. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2013.084
  • Habib S, Dong S, Liu Y, Liao W, Zhang S (2022) The first phylotranscriptomic study of Macrozamia reveals deep divergences among major clades. Annals of Botany 130(5): 671–685. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcac117
  • Habib S, Gong Y, Dong S, Lindstrom A, Stevenson DW, Wu H, Zhang S (2023) Phylotranscriptomics shed light on intrageneric relationships and historical biogeography of Ceratozamia (Cycadales). Plants 12(3): 478. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12030478
  • Habib S, Lindstrom A, Clugston JAR, Gong Y, Dong S, Wang Y, Stevenson D, Feng C, Zhang S (2025) Integrative phylogenomics and morphology reveal the evolution and biogeography of Encephalartos (Zamiaceae). Journal of Systematics and Evolution 64(2): 295–312. https://doi.org/10.1111/jse.70034
  • Hoang DT, Chernomor O, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ, Vinh LS (2018) UFBoot2: improving the ultrafast bootstrap approximation. Molecular Biology and Evolution 35(2): 518–522. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msx281
  • Isaac NJB, Turvey ST, Collen B, Waterman C, Baillie JEM (2007) Mammals on the EDGE: conservation priorities based on threat and phylogeny. PLOS ONE 2(3): e296. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000296
  • Kalyaanamoorthy S, Minh BQ, Wong TKF, von Haeseler A, Jermiin LS (2017) ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nature Methods 14(6): 587–589. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4285
  • Katoh K, Standley DM (2013) MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30(4): 772–780. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst010
  • Lanfear R, Hahn MW (2024) The meaning and measure of concordance factors in phylogenomics. Molecular Biology and Evolution 41(11): msae214. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msae214
  • Lindstrom AJ, Habib S, Dong S, Gong Y, Liu J, Calonje M, Stevenson D, Zhang S (2024) Transcriptome sequencing data provide a solid base to understand the phylogenetic relationships, biogeography and reticulated evolution of the genus Zamia L. (Cycadales: Zamiaceae). Annals of Botany 134(5): 747. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcae065
  • Liu J, Long S, Lindstrom AJ, Gong Y-Q, Dong S-S, Pan Y-Z, Zhang S (2026) Late Miocene climate change and orogenies jointly shaped the diversity patterns and evolution of a Neotropical cycad. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 682: 113459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2025.113459
  • Liu Y, Wang S, Li L, Yang T, Dong S, Wei T, Wu S, Liu Y, Gong Y, Feng X, Ma J, Chang G, Huang J, Yang Y, Wang H, Liu M, Xu Y, Liang H, Yu J, Cai Y, Zhang Z, Fan Y, Mu W, Ozkan SG, Wan S, Hong T, Zhang B, Wei Z, Hou C, Huang J, Ren Y, Song Y, Liu S, Wang J, Wang X, Lu J, Hu L, Sun S, Li L, Zeng L, Ran J, Zhang S, Ralph PE, Sederoff R, Sederoff HW (2022) The Cycas genome and the early evolution of seed plants. Nature Plants 8(4): 389–401. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-022-01129-7
  • Minh BQ, Hahn MW, Lanfear R (2020a) New methods to calculate concordance factors for phylogenomic datasets. Molecular Biology and Evolution 37(9): 2727–2733. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msaa106
  • Minh BQ, Schmidt HA, Chernomor O, Schrempf D, Woodhams MD, von Haeseler A, Lanfear R (2020b) IQ-TREE 2: new models and efficient methods for phylogenetic inference in the genomic era. Molecular Biology and Evolution 37(5): 1530–1534. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msaa015
  • Mo YK, Lanfear R, Hahn MW, Minh BQ (2023) Updated site concordance factors minimize effects of homoplasy and taxon sampling. Bioinformatics 39(1): btac741. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btac741
  • Nagalingum NS, Marshall CR, Quental TB, Rai HS, Little DP, Mathews S (2011) Recent synchronous radiation of a living fossil. Science 334: 796–799. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1209926
  • Salas-Leiva DE, Meerow AW, Calonje M, Griffith MP, Francisco-Ortega J, Nakamura K, Stevenson DW, Lewis CE, Namoff S (2013) Phylogeny of the cycads based on multiple single-copy nuclear genes: congruence of concatenated parsimony, likelihood and species tree inference methods. Annals of Botany 112(7): 1263–1278. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mct192
  • Shank SD, Weaver S, Kosakovsky Pond SL (2018) phylotree.js — a JavaScript library for application development and interactive data visualization in phylogenetics. BMC Bioinformatics 19: 276. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-018-2283-2
  • Smith SA, O'Meara BC (2012) treePL: divergence time estimation using penalized likelihood for large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 28(20): 2689–2690. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts492
  • Wendel JF, Doyle JJ (1998) Phylogenetic incongruence: window into genome history and molecular evolution. In: Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Doyle JJ (Eds) Molecular Syste­matics of Plants II: DNA Sequencing. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 265–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5419-6_10
  • Wong TKF, Ly-Trong N, Ren H, Baños H, Roger AJ, Susko E, Bielow C, De Maio N, Goldman N, Hahn MW, Huttley G, Lanfear R, Minh BQ (2025) IQ-TREE 3: phylogenomic inference software using complex evolutionary models. EcoEvoRxiv preprint. https://doi.org/10.32942/X2P62N