Published September 17, 2020 | Version v1

Valuation of ecosystem services of guadua bamboo (Guadua angustifolia) forest in the southwestern of Pereira, Colombia

  • 1. Grupo de Investigación en Gestión de Agroecosistemas Tropicales Andinos, Facultad de Ciencias Ambientales, Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira, Carrera 27 no. 10-02 Barrio Alamos, Pereira, Risaralda, Colombia. juli-ana@utp.edu.co*, jupipe@utp.edu.co, catromero@utp.edu.co

Description

Muñoz-López, Juliana, Camargo-García, Juan Carlos, Romero-Ladino, Catalina (2021): Valuation of ecosystem services of guadua bamboo (Guadua angustifolia) forest in the southwestern of Pereira, Colombia. Caldasia 43 (1): 186-196, DOI: 10.15446/caldasia.v43n1.63297, URL: https://doi.org/10.15446/caldasia.v43n1.63297

Files

source.pdf

Files (1.2 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:02844cccf499b3aa136bf28209e978c0
1.2 MB Preview Download

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:FF84FFCCFF99FFAA136BFF82FFE9FFC0

References

  • Abelson P. 1996. Cost-benefit analysis. In: Project Apprais- al and Valuation of Environment: General Principles and Six Case-Studies in Developing Countries. London: Palgrave Macmillan. p.15-37.
  • Adhikari K, Hartemink AE. 2016. Linking soils to ecosystem services - A global review. Geoderma. 262: 101-111. doi: https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.08.009
  • Arango AM, Camargo JC. 2010. Bosques de guadua del Eje Cafetero de Colombia: oportunidades para su inclusion en el mercado voluntario de carbono y en el Programa REDD+. Recur. Nat. Ambient. 61:77-85.
  • Arango AM. 2011. Posibilidades de la guadua para la mitigacion del cambio climatico. Caso: Eje Cafetero Colombiano. (Risaralda-Colombia). [Thesis]. [Pereira]: Universidad Tecnologica de Pereira.
  • Arango AM, Camargo JC, Castano JM. 2017. Sustainability calculation approach of guadua (Guadua angustifolia Kunth.) forests through out the use of emergetic analysis. Acta Agron. 66 (4):531-537. doi: https://doi.org/10.15446/acag.v66n4.57478
  • Arrow KJ, Cropper ML, Eads GC, Hahn RW, Lave LB, Noll RG, Porthney PR, Russell M, Shmalensee R, Smith VK, Stavins RN. 1996. Is there a role for benefit/cost analysis in environmental, health, and safety regulation? Science. 272(5259):221-222. doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.272(5259)272.5259.221
  • Boardman AE, Greenberg DH, Vining AR, Weimer DL. 1996. Cost-benefit analysis: concepts and practice. Upper Saddle Riv- er, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Calle Z, Piedrahita L. 2008. Conservacion de flora amenazada en fincas ganaderas de la cuenca media del rio La Vieja. In: Murgueitio E, Cuartas C, Naranjo JF, editors. Ganaderia del futuro: investigacion para el desarrollo. Cali, Colombia: Fundacion CI- PAV. p. 148-169.
  • Biodiversity and its ecosystem services, marine environment and inland waters, biodiversity and sustainable use 2014. This research was carried out in the framework of the project: "El Valor de los Bosques en Paisajes Andinos Fragmen- tados: El caso de los bosques de guadua en la Region del eje Cafetero de Colombia", contrato 117-2015, funded by Colciencias and Universidad Tecnologica de Pereira. Also, thanks go to the owner of Yarima farm and the Research Group in Management of Andean Tropical Agroecosystems of the Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Universidad Tecnologica de Pereira. Camargo JC, Chara J, Giraldo Sanchez LP, Chara-Serna AM, Pedraza GX. 2010a. Beneficios de los corredores riberenos de Guadua angustifolia en la proteccion de ambientes acuaticos en la Ecorregion Cafetera de Colombia. Efectos sobre las propiedades del suelo. Recur. Nat. Ambient. CATIE. 61:53-59.
  • Camargo JC, Rodriguez JA, Arango AM. 2010b. Crecimiento y fija- cion de carbono en una plantacion de guadua en la zona cafetera de Colombia. Recur. Nat. Ambient. CATIE. 61: 86-94.
  • Camargo JC, Kleinn C. 2010. Length curves and volume functions for Guadua bamboo (Guadua angustifolia Kunth) for the coffee region of Colombia. Eur. J. For. Res. 129 (6):1231-1222. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-010-0411-2
  • Chara J, Giraldo L P, Chara A M, Pedraza G X. 2010. Beneficios de los corredores riberenos de Guadua angustifolia en la proteccion de ambientes acuaticos en la Ecorregion Cafetera de Colombia. Efectos sobre la escorrentia y captura de nutrientes. Recur. Nat. Ambient. 61:60-66.
  • Daily G, editor. 1997. Nature's services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
  • Davies R. 1997. Environmental regulation, benefit-cost analysis and the policy environment in less developed countries. Environ. Dev. Econ. 2(2):206-210. doi https://doi.org/10.1017/ S1355770X97240167
  • Dominati E, Patterson M, Mackay A. 2010. A framework for classifying and quantifying the natural capital and ecosystem services of soils. Ecol. Econ. 69(9):1858-1868. doi: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.05.002
  • Dossman M. 2009. Valoracion de los servicios ecologicos prestados por el suelo bajo distintas coberturas naturales. Caso de estudio: Ecorregion del Eje Cafetero. (Risaralda-Colombia). [Tesis]. [Bogota]: Pontificia Universidad Javeriana.
  • Duking R, Gielis J, Liese W. 2011. Carbon flux and carbon stock in a bamboo stand and their relevance for mitigating climate change. J. Am. Bamboo. Soc. 24:1-7.
  • Ehrenbergerova L, Cienciala E, Kucera A, Guy L, Habrova H. 2016. Carbon stock in agroforestry coffee plantations with different shade trees in Villa Rica, Peru. Agroforest. Syst. 90:433-445. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-015-9865-z [EPA] United States Environmental Protection Agency. 2000. Guidelines for preparing economic analyses. U.S.: EPA.
  • Freeman III AM. 1993. The measurement of environmental and resource values: theory and methods. Washington D.C., USA: Resources for the Future.
  • Gibbs HK, Brown S, Niles JO, Foley JA. 2007. Monitoring and es- timating tropical forest carbon stocks: making REDD a reality. Environ. Res. Lett. 2(4):13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748- 9326/2/4/045023
  • Gil H, De Prada J, Plevich JO, Cisneros JM, Sanchez AR. 2005. Tecnologias verdes para el aprovechamiento de aguas residuales urbanas: analisis economico. Cordoba, Argentina: Universidad Nacional de Rio Cuarto. [GIZ] Ministerio Federal de Cooperacion Economica y Desarrollo de Alemania. 2011. Valoracion economica de los servicios ecosistemicos. Lima, Peru: GIZ.
  • IPCC. c2006. Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme. Eggleston HS, Buendia L, Miwa K, Ngara T, Tanabe K, editors. Published: IGES, Japan. [last accessed: 01 May 2018] https://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/index.html
  • Isagi Y, Kawahara T, Kamo K, Ito H. 1997. Net production and carbon cycling in a bamboo Phyllostachyspubescens stand. Plant. Ecol.130:41-52.doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009711814070
  • Judziewicz EL, Clark G, Londono X, Stern MJ. 1999. American bamboos. Washington DC.: Smithsonian Institution Press.
  • Kleinn C, Morales-Hidalgo D. 2006. An inventory of Guadua (Guadua angustifolia) bamboo in the Coffee Region of Colombia. Eur. J. For. Res. 125(4):361-368. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10342-006-0129-3
  • Koim N. 2009. Urban sprawl, land cover change and forest fragmentation. A case study of Pereira, Colombia. Berlin, Germany: Humboldt-Universitat Zu Berlin.
  • Landsberg J, Miller R, Anderson H, Tepp J. 2003. Bulk density and soil resistance to penetration as affected by commercial thinning in northeastern Washington. Res. Pap. PNW-RP-551. Portland, OR: U.S. department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 35. doi: https://doi.org/10.2737/ PNW-RP-551
  • Liese W. 2009. Bamboo as carbon-sink - fact or fiction? In: VIII World Bamboo Congress Proceedings. 3: 71-77.
  • Magana S, Harmand JM, Hergoualch K. 2004. Cuantificacion del carbono almacenado en la biomasa aerea y el mantillo en sistemas agroforestales de cafe en el suroeste de Costa Rica. Agrofor. Am. 41(42):98-104.
  • Malagon D, Chamorro C, Fernandez J, Llinas R, Pulido C, editors. 1995. Suelos de Colombia, origen, evolucion, clasificacion, distribucion y uso. Bogota: Instituto Geografico Agustin Codazzi.
  • Marin D, Guedez Y, Marquez de Hernandez L. 2008. Las plan- taciones de guadua (Guadua angustifolia Kunth) y bambu (Bambusa vulgaris Wendland) de San Javier, estado Yaracuy, Venezuela: I. Aspectos climaticos y caida de hojarasca. Rev. Fac. Agron. 25(2):261-285.
  • Matus F, Rumpel C, Neculman R, Panichini M, Mora ML. 2014. Soil carbon storage and stabilisation in andic soils: A review. Catena. 120:102-110. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2014.04.008
  • Maya JM, Camargo JC, Marino O. 2017. Caracteristicas de los culmos de guadua de acuerdo al sitio y su estado de madurez. Rev. Colomb. For. 20(2):171-180. doi: https://doi.org/10.14483/udistrital.jour.colomb.for.2017.2.a06
  • Mejia L. 2010. Pasado y futuro de los bosques de guadua en el Eje Cafetero colombiano: el caso de Yarima Guadua. Recur. Nat. Ambient. 61:6-10. [MEA] Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Evaluacion de los Ecosistemas del Milenio. Informe de Sintesis, Borrador final. Washington: Millennium Ecosystem Assessment.
  • Molfino JH, Califra, A. c2001. Agua disponible de las Tierras del Uruguay Segunda Aproximacion. Division Suelos y Aguas Direccion General de Recursos Naturales Renovables Ministerio de Ganaderia, Agricultura y Pesca. [last accessed: 01 May 2018] http://www.inia.uy/Publicaciones/Documentos%20compartidos/111219220807174344.pdf
  • Munoz Lopez J, Camargo Garcia, JC, Dossman Gil MA. 2016. Vis- lumbrando agroecosistemas menos vulnerables a la variabilidad climatica en los Andes de Colombia. Casos en la cuenca media del rio Otun. Pereira, Colombia: Universidad Tecnologica de Pereira.
  • Murgueitio E. 2003. Impacto ambiental de la ganaderia de leche en Colombia y alternativas de solucion. Livest. Res. Rural Dev. 15(10):78.
  • Nath AJ, Das AK. 2007. Carbon pool and carbon sequestration potential of village bamboos in the agroforestry system of Northeast India. In: Proceedings of the International Tropical Ecology Congress: 159. HNB Garhwal University. Varanasi: Uttarakhand and International Society for Tropical Ecology.
  • Nath AJ, Das G, Das AK. 2008. Above ground biomass, production and carbon sequestration in farmer managed village bamboo grove in Assam, northeast India. J. Am. Bamboo. Soc. 21(1):32-40.
  • Ortega D. 1995. Consideraciones Generales para Interpretar Analisis de Suelos. In: Malagon D, Chamorro C, Fernandez J, Llinas R, Pulido C, editors. Suelos de Colombia, origen, evolucion, clasificacion, distribucion y uso. Bogota: Instituto Geografico Agustin Codazzi. p. 423.
  • Ospina R, Finegan B. 2004. Variabilidad floristica y estructural de los bosques dominados por Guadua angustifolia en el eje cafetero colombiano. Recur. Nat. Ambient. 41:25-33.
  • Ospina R. 2002. Factores que determinan las caracteristicas floristicas estructurales de los fragmentos dominados por Guadua angustifolia Kunth en el eje cafetero colombiano y su relacion con los aprovechamientos de guadua. (Turrialba-Costa Rica) [Tesis]. [Turrialba]: CATIE.
  • Palm C, Sanchez P, Ahamed S, Awiti A.2007. Soils: a contemporary perspective. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resources. 32:99-129. doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.31.020105.100307
  • Pan Y, Luo T, Birdsey R, Hom J, Melillo J. 2004. New estimates carbon storage and sequestration in Chinas Forest: Effect of ageclass and method on inventory-based carbon estimation. Climatic Change. 67:211-236. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584- 004-2799-5
  • Ramirez F. 2017. Caracteristicas floristicas y estructurales de dos fragmentos de bosques dominados por Guadua angustifolia Kunth pertenecientes a la cuenca media y baja del Rio La Vieja. [Tesis]. [Pereira]: Universidad Tecnologica de Pereira.
  • Robinson DA, Lebron L, Vereecken H. 2009. On the definition of the natural capital of soils: a framework for description, evaluation, and monitoring. Soil. Sci. Soc. Am. J. 73(6): 1904-1911. doi: https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2008.0332
  • Sanchez EL, Camargo JC. 2014. Diversidad de avifauna en paisajes rurales de la cuenca del rio La Vieja, Eje Cafetero de Colombia. Recur. Nat. Ambient. CATIE. 65(66):83-89.
  • Shibata H, Kuraji K, Toda H, Sasa K. 2001. Regional comparison of nitrogen export to Japanese forest streams. Sci World J. 1(Suppl 2):572-580. doi: https://doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2001.371
  • Stern MJ. 1995. Vegetation recovery on earthquake-triggered land- slide sites in the Ecuadorian Andes. In: Churchill SP, Balslev HE. Foreroand JL. Luteyn, editors. Biodiversity and Conservation of Neotropical Montane Forests. New York: The New York Botanical Garden. p. 207-220.
  • Swanson RA. 1995. Human resource development: performance is the key. Hum. Res. Devel. Q. 6(2):207-213. doi: https://doi. org/10.1002/hrdq.3920060208
  • Tariyal K, Upadhyay A, Tewari S, Melkania U. 2013.Plant and soil carbon stock and carbon sequestration potential in four major bamboo species of North India. J. Adv. Lab. Res. Biol. 4(3):100-108. [USDA] U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. c2018. National Soil Survey Handbook, title 430-VI. Soil Properties and Qualities (Part 618), Available Water Capacity (618.05). [last accessed: May 2018] http://soils.usda. gov/technical/handbook/
  • Venkatesh MS, Bhatt BP, Kumar K, Majumdar B, Singh K. 2005. Soil properties as influenced by some important edible bamboo species in the north eastern Himalayan region, India. J. Bamboo. Rattan. 4(3):221-230.
  • Wunder S. 2006. Are direct payments for environmental services spelling doom for sustainable forest management in the tropics? Ecol. Soc. 11(2):23.
  • Yuen JQ, Fung T, Ziegler AD. 2017. Carbon stocks in bamboo ecosystems worldwide: Estimates and uncertainties. For. Ecol. Manag. 393:113-138. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fore- co.2017.01.017