Published May 16, 2026 | Version v3

Personalizing STEM Learning at Scale: An Adaptive AI Tutoring Suite with Student Modeling, Curriculum Sequencing, and Explainable Formative Feedback

Description

Personalized, real-time instruction in STEM classrooms remains a persistent challenge: student cohorts vary widely in prior knowledge and misconception patterns, while teachers lack timely, individualized data to adapt instruction dynamically. This paper presents the Adaptive Tutoring Suite (ATS), a modular AI-driven platform designed to improve measurable learning outcomes in STEM micro-learning environments. The ATS integrates four evidence-informed components: (1) a hybrid Bayesian Knowledge Tracing (BKT) and transformer-embedding student model that produces calibrated, real-time mastery estimates; (2) a constrained curriculum sequencing engine combining Mixed-Integer Quadratic Programming (MIQP) with an online contextual bandit to minimize expected lessons-to-mastery under classroom resource constraints; (3) an explainable automated formative feedback pipeline that fuses large language model (LLM) outputs with symbolic validators to generate accurate, actionable hints; and (4) a teacher-facing dashboard providing intervention recommendations and a feedback review queue. We evaluate the ATS using publicly available datasets (ASSISTments, EdNet) and parameterized synthetic classroom cohorts, reporting mastery prediction accuracy, normalized learning gain, time-to-mastery reduction, and feedback utility. Results from simulation and ablation analyses indicate that the hybrid student model improves mastery calibration over standard BKT, the MIQP-bandit sequencer reduces expected instructional time compared to greedy baselines, and the hybrid feedback pipeline achieves higher teacher-rated hint utility with fewer high-confidence errors than an LLM-only approach. Implications for scalable, equitable personalization in STEM education and directions for real-world classroom deployment are discussed.

Files

Files (572.5 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:1d27ea62d73a82f664fe1f7a26bcf423
572.5 kB Download

Additional details

Dates

Accepted
2026

Software

Repository URL
https://github.com/udaytx009/production-ready-samples
Programming language
Python
Development Status
Active

References

  • 1. Babaei, H.; Karimpour, J.; Hadidi, A. A survey of approaches for university course timetabling problem. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2015, 86, 43–59. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.cie.2014.11.010
  • 2. Baker, R.S.; Inventado, P.S. Educational data mining and learning analytics. In Learning Analytics; Larusson, J.A., White, B., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2014; pp. 61–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3305-7_4
  • 3. Black, P.; Wiliam, D. Assessment and classroom learning. Assess. Educ. 1998, 5, 7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
  • 4. Bloom, B.S. The 2-sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educ. Res. 1984, 13, 4–16. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X013006004
  • 5. Choi, Y.; Lee, Y.; Cho, J.; Baek, J.; Kim, B.; Cha, Y.; Shin, D.; Bae, C.; Heo, J. EdNet: A large-scale hierarchical dataset in education. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, Ifrane, Morocco, 6–10 July 2020; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 69–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52240-7_13
  • 6. Clement, B.; Roy, D.; Oudeyer, P.-Y.; Lopes, M. Multi-armed bandits for intelligent tutoring systems. J. Educ. Data Min. 2015, 7, 20–48. https://jedm.educationaldatamining.org/index.php/JEDM/article/view/111
  • 7. Corbett, A.T.; Anderson, J.R. Knowledge tracing: Modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge. User Model. User-Adapt. Interact. 1994, 4, 253–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01099821
  • 8. De La Torre, J. DINA model and parameter estimation: A didactic. J. Educ. Behav. Stat. 2009, 34, 115–130. https://doi.org/10.3102/1076998607309474
  • 9. Doignon, J.-P.; Falmagne, J.-C. Knowledge Spaces; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1999; ISBN 978-3-642-58625-5.
  • 10. Drori, I.; Zhang, S.; Shuttleworth, R.; Tang, L.; Lu, A.; Ke, E.; Liu, K.; Chen, L.; Tran, S.; Chea, N.; et al. A neural network solves, explains, and generates university math problems by program synthesis and few-shot learning at human level. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2022, 119, e2123433119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2123433119