Published May 16, 2026 | Version v1
Working paper Open

Perturbed Utility Functionals: A Functional-Analytic Framework for Adaptive Decision-Making

  • 1. ROR icon Indira Gandhi National Open University

Description

We propose a functional-analytic framework for modeling bounded rationality by introducing \emph{perturbed utility functionals}. By extending classical expected utility with a structured perturbation term, we capture behavioral deviations such as loss aversion and risk sensitivity while maintaining analytical tractability. We establish fundamental existence results and demonstrate the consistency of our framework by proving convergence to classical models in the limit of vanishing bias. Through numerical simulations, we illustrate two key findings: (i) in portfolio optimization, our framework captures non-linear "regime shifts" in risk appetite, and (ii) in sequential decision-making, it generates "emergent cautiousness," allowing AI agents to navigate safely around high-risk states. This framework unifies descriptive behavioral insights with prescriptive optimization, offering a scalable pathway for integrating human-like heuristics into AI safety and control systems.

Files

Perturbed_Utility_Functionals__A_Mathematical_Framework_for_Modeling_Bounded_Rationality_in_Decision_Theory.zip

Additional details

Dates

Submitted
2026-05-16

References

  • [1] Dario Amodei, Chris Olah, Jacob Steinhardt, Paul Christiano, John Schulman, and Dan Man´e. Concrete problems in ai safety. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.06565, 2016.
  • [2] Chris L Baker, Julian Jara-Ettinger, Rebecca Saxe, and Joshua B Tenenbaum. Rational inference: The newest revolution in the science of thought? Trends in cognitive sciences, 21(8):588–600, 2017.
  • [3] Stephen Casper et al. Open problems in mechanistic interpretability for ai safety. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.14967, 2023.
  • [4] Y Ge and et al. Fairness in reinforcement learning: A survey. AAAI Publications, 2024.
  • [5] S Geier et al. Behavioral finance: A review of the literature. Journal of Economic Surveys, 2012.
  • [6] Lars Peter Hansen, Thomas J Sargent, Gauhar Turmuhambetova, and Noah Williams. Ro- bust control and model misspecification. Journal of Economic Theory, 128(1):45–90, 2006
  • [7] Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky. Prospect theory: An analysis of decisions under risk. Econometrica, 47(2):263–291, 1979.
  • [8] Volodymyr Mnih, Koray Kavukcuoglu, David Silver, Andrei A Rusu, Joel Veness, Marc G Bellemare, Alex Graves, Martin Riedmiller, Andreas K Fidjeland, Georg Ostrovski, et al. Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning. Nature, 518(7540):529–533, 2015.
  • [9] Richard S Sutton and Andrew G Barto. Reinforcement learning: An introduction. MIT press, 1998.