Typhoon Khanun-driven stormwater runoff enhances the detection of terrestrial mammalian environmental DNA in a forest stream
Authors/Creators
- 1. Human and Ecocare Center, Konkuk University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- 2. PJ Factory. Co. Ltd, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Description
Monitoring terrestrial mammalian biodiversity remains challenging due to the limitations of conventional survey methods, including high labour requirements and detection bias. This study investigated how an extreme rainfall event, Typhoon Khanun (August 2023), influences the detection of terrestrial mammalian environmental DNA (eDNA) in a stream ecosystem. Samples were collected during the typhoon-induced runoff and again after hydrological conditions returned to baseline. Mammalian eDNA was successfully detected only during the rainfall event, whereas no mammalian DNA was detected in post-event samples. Metabarcoding analysis, targeting mitochondrial 12S rDNA, identified ten mammalian species from stormwater runoff, including both wild and anthropogenic taxa, while conventional surveys detected only two species at the same sites. These findings demonstrate that typhoon-driven runoff can transiently mobilise and concentrate terrestrial mammalian eDNA into stream systems, substantially enhancing detection probability. However, the detection of non-resident and anthropogenic species highlights the need for careful interpretation of runoff-derived eDNA signals. Overall, this study shows that extreme rainfall events can act as natural sampling windows that integrate catchment-scale biodiversity signals, providing a complementary approach for terrestrial mammal monitoring.
Files
BDJ_article_194007.pdf
Files
(1.1 MB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:1a0b75630e6da78736e2cc738ec77a77
|
999.2 kB | Preview Download |
|
md5:f5009293be23fc48e14b26a34fd763c2
|
125.5 kB | Preview Download |
Linked records
Additional details
References
- Arslan A, Ilhak OI, Calicioglu M (2006) Effect of method of cooking on identification of heat processed beef using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique. Meat science 72 (2): 326‑330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2005.08.001
- Beng KC, Corlett RT (2020) Applications of environmental DNA (eDNA) in ecology and conservation: opportunities, challenges and prospects. Biodiversity and conservation 29: 2089‑2121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-020-01980-0
- Bohmann AE, Gilbert MT, Carvalho GR, Creer S, Knapp M (2014) Environmental DNA for wildlife biology and biodiversity monitoring. Trends in ecology & evolution 29 (ue 6): 358‑367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2014.04.003
- Broadhurs H, Sales N, Raynor R, Howe C, Ochu E, Lambin X, Sutherland C, McDevitt AD (2025) From water to land: A review on the applications of environmental DNA and invertebrate‐derived DNA for monitoring terrestrial and semi‐aquatic mammals. Mammal Review 55 (4): e70006. https://doi.org/10.1111/mam.70006
- Calderón-Franco D, Loosdrecht MMv, Abeel T, Weissbrodt D (2021) Free-floating extracellular DNA: Systematic profiling of mobile genetic elements and antibiotic resistance from wastewater. Water Research 189: 116592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2020.116592
- Callahan BJ, Mcmurdie P, Rosen MJ, Han AW, Johnson AJA, Holmes SP (2016) DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nature methods 13: 581‑583. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3869
- Chacko MR, Altermatt F, Fopp F, Guisan A, Keggin T, Lyet A, Rey PL, Richards E, Valentini A, Waldock C (2023) Catchment-based sampling of river eDNA integrates terrestrial and aquatic biodiversity of alpine landscapes. Oecologia 202: 699‑713. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-023-05428-4
- Chambers J (2008) Software for data analysis: programming with R. Springer, New York. [ISBN 978-0-387-75935-7] https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-75936-4_6
- Cromsigt JG, Rensburg SJv, Etienne R, Olff H (2009) Monitoring large herbivore diversity at different scales: comparing direct and indirect methods. Biodiversity and Conservation 18 (5): 1219‑1231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-008-9506-1
- Cutler L, Swann DE (1999) Using remote photography in wildlife ecology: a review. Wildlife Society Bulletin 27: 571‑581.
- Danacova M, Valent P, Výleta R, Hlavčová K (2017) The effects of rainfall on surface runoff and soil erosion from forest areas. 17. Conference: 17th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM2017, Bulgaria, 29 June - 5 July 2017. Albena, 231 pp. [ISBN 978-1-5108-4819-1]. https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2017H/33/S14.080
- Doh KS, Jang IY, Kim KJ (1986) A study on the soild waste of Bukhan Mt national park. The Korean professional engineering association 19 (1): 12‑24.
- Fang Y, Du S, Abdoola R, Djouani K, Richards C (2016) Motion based animal detection in aerial videos. Procedia Computer Science 92: 13‑17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.07.316
- Girolamo ED (2022) Evaluation of survey methods used to determine semi-aquatic mammal occupancy in Northeastern Indiana. Department of Biological Sciences at Purdue Fort Wayne, Indiana, 60 pp.
- Göbel P, Dierkes C, Coldewey W (2007) Storm water runoff concentration matrix for urban areas. Journal of contaminant hydrology 91: 26‑42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2006.08.008
- Harper L, Handley LL, Carpenter AI, Ghazali M, Muri C, Macgregor CJ, Logan TW, Law A, Breithaupt T, Read DS (2019) Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding of pond water as a tool to survey conservation and management priority mammals. Biological conservation 238: 108225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108225
- Kang D, Sung H (2016) A Study on the relationship between the number of visitors and degradation of natural resources in Bukhansan National Park. Journal of the Korean Society of Environmental Restoration Technology 19: 81‑89. https://doi.org/10.13087/kosert.2016.19.4.81
- Khaleel R, Reddy K, Overcash M (1980) Transport of potential pollutants in runoff water from land areas receiving animal wastes: a review. Water Research 14 (5): 421‑436. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(80)90206-7
- Khwaja H, Buchan C, Wearn OR, Bantlin D, Bernard H, Bitariho R, Bohm T, Borah J, Brodie J, Chutipong W (2019) Pangolins in global camera trap data: Implications for ecological monitoring. Global Ecology and Conservation 20: 00769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00769
- Kim E, Jeong S, Park S, Shin K (2021) Current status of mammals in Bukhansan national park. Journal of Agriculture & Life Science 55 (6): 39‑47. https://doi.org/10.14397/jals.2021.55.6.39
- Kim G, Oh K, Choi Y (1987) User′s effects on avifauna in Bukhan mountain national park. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology 1: 24‑34.
- Kim HG, Baek KY, Park HJ, Jeong S, Kim Y, Injae H (2023) Predicting Potential Areas of Occurrence Using Location Information for Wild Boars in Bukhansan National Park. The Korea Institute of Information and Communication Engineering, Hankyung National University, 2023.10.26-28. Ansung
- Korea National Park Service (2023) Status of Biological Resources in Bukhansan National Park.
- Kubo T, Mieno T, Kuriyama K (2019) Wildlife viewing: The impact of money-back guarantees. Tourism Management 70: 49‑55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2018.06.010
- Lee AR (2022) An analysis of residents and experts' perception on conservation and utilization of urban rivers. Ecology and Resilient Infrastructure 9 (2): 124‑129. https://doi.org/10.17820/eri.2022.9.2.124
- Lee J, Kim Y, Bae Y (2019) A study of methods for monitoring wild mammals in Unmunsan, Korea. Journal of Asia-Pacific Biodiversity 12 (4): 541‑544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japb.2019.04.005
- Lyet A, Pellissier L, Valentini A, Dejean T, Hehmeyer A, Naidoo R (2021) eDNA sampled from stream networks correlates with camera trap detection rates of terrestrial mammals. Scientific Reports 11: 11362. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90598-5
- Martin M (2011) Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet. Journal 17: 10‑12. https://doi.org/10.14806/ej.17.1.200
- Minamoto T, Miya M, Sado T, Seino S, Doi H, Kondoh M, Uchii K (2021) An illustrated manual for environmental DNA research: Water sampling guidelines and experimental protocols. Environmental DNA 3 (1): 8‑13. https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.121
- Murray SR, Butler RC, Hardacre AK, Timmerman-Vaughan GM (2007) Use of quantitative real-time PCR to estimate maize endogenous DNA degradation after cooking and extrusion or in food products. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry 55 (6): 2231‑2239. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf0636061
- Newey PD, Nazir S, Fairhurst G, Verdicchio F (2015) Limitations of recreational camera traps for wildlife management and conservation research: A practitioner's perspective S. Ambio 44: 624‑635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-015-0713-1
- Othman N, Haris H, Fatin Z, Faudzir NM (2021) A review on environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding markers for wildlife monitoring research. IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science, Malaysia, 4-5 November 2020. Melaka, 736, 6 pp. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/736/1/012054
- Othman N, Muniar K, Haris H, Ramli FF, Sariyat NH, Najmuddin MF, Abdul-Latiff MAB (2023) A review of next-generation wildlife monitoring using environmental DNA (eDNA) detection and next-generation sequencing in Malaysia. Sains Malaysiana 52 (1): 17‑33. https://doi.org/10.17576/jsm-2023-5201-02
- Pollack SJ, Kawalek MD, Williams-Hill DM, Hellberg RS (2018) Evaluation of DNA barcoding methodologies for the identification of fish species in cooked products. Food control 84: 297‑304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2017.08.013
- Prosekov A, Kuznetsov A, Rada A, Ivanova S (2020) Methods for monitoring large terrestrial animals in the wild. Forests 11 (8): 808. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11080808
- Richardson E, Nimmo DG, Avitabile S, Tworkowski L, Watson SJ, Welbourne D, Leonard S (2018) Camera traps and pitfalls: an evaluation of two methods for surveying reptiles in a semiarid ecosystem. Wildlife Research 44 (8): 637‑647. https://doi.org/10.1071/WR16048
- Rose J, Wademan C, Weir S, Wood JS, Todd BD (2019) Traditional trapping methods outperform eDNA sampling for introduced semi-aquatic snakes. Plos one 14: 0219244. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219244
- Şakalar E, Abasiyanik MF, Bektik E, Tayyrov A (2012) Effect of heat processing on DNA quantification of meat species. Journal of food science 77 (9): 40‑44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2012.02853.xDigitalObjectIdentifier(DOI)
- Sales N, Mckenzie MB, Drake J, Harper LR, Browett SS, Coscia I, Wangensteen OS, Baillie C, Bryce E, Dawson DA (2020) Fishing for mammals: Landscape‐level monitoring of terrestrial and semi‐aquatic communities using eDNA from riverine systems. Journal of Applied Ecology 57 (4): 707‑716. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13592
- Senapati D, Bhattacharya M, Kar A, Chini DS, Das BK, Patra BC (2019) Environmental DNA (eDNA): A Promising Biological Survey Tool for Aquatic Species Detection. Proceedings of the Zoological Society 72: 211‑228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12595-018-0268-9
- Shogren AJ, Tank JL, Andruszkiewicz E, Olds B, Mahon AR, Jerde CL, Bolster D (2017) Controls on eDNA movement in streams: Transport, retention, and resuspension. Scientific reports 7 (1): 5065. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05223-1
- Tangil BSd, Rodriguez A (2021) Uniform performance of mammal detection methods under contrasting environmental conditions in Mediterranean landscapes. Ecosphere 12 (3): 03349. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3349
- Ushio M, Fukuda H, Inoue T, Makoto K, Kishida O, Sato K, Murata K, Nikaido M, Sado T, Sato Y (2017) Environmental DNA enables detection of terrestrial mammals from forest pond water. Molecular Ecology Resources 17: 63‑75. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12690
- Waterloo MJ, Oliveira SM, Drucker DP, Nobre AD, Cuartas LA, Hodnett MG, Langedijk I, Jans WW, Tomasella J, Araújo AC (2006) Export of organic carbon in run‐off from an Amazonian rainforest blackwater catchment. Hydrological Processes: An International Journal 20: 2581‑2597. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6217
- Willcox D, Nash H, Trageser S, Kim HJ, Hywood L, Connelly E, Ichu I, Nyumu JK, Moumbolou CLM, Ingram DJ, Challender D (2019) Evaluating methods for detecting and monitoring pangolin (Pholidata: Manidae) populations. Global Ecology and Conservation 17: 00539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00539