ELECTRONICS & ELECTRICAL DOMAIN
Published May 15, 2026 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Security for Physical Component in Embedded System

Authors/Creators

Description

Embedded systems, for which technological developments appear to occur with a degree of "news almost every day," are becoming more and more important in our daily lives. There is a computer system everywhere, whether it is found in smart household appliances and smartphones or in industrial control systems and automobile electronics. None the less, as people become accustomed to the present, they are calling for stronger security measures to guard against changing online risks. The process of creating secure embedded systems has changed significantly during the last ten years. Since embedded devices were primarily used in isolation, they did not communicate with other devices and were therefore not vulnerable to outside threats. This paradigm was the norm until the emergence of the Internet of Things (IoT), but it has since undergone a radical shift.

Files

Security For Physical Component In Embedded System -HBRP Publication.pdf

Files (481.6 kB)

Additional details

References

  • 1. Pouraghily, A., Wolf, T., & Tessier, R. (2017). Hardware support for embedded operating system security. IEEE.
  • 2. Federal Trade Commission. (2015). Internet of things: Privacy security in a connected world.
  • 3. Sanger, D. E., & Perlroth, N. (2016, October). A new era of internet attacks powered by everyday devices. The New York Times.
  • 4. Jaeger, T. (Ed.). (2008). Operating system security. Morgan and Claypool.
  • 5. Suh, G. E., Lee, J. W., Zhang, D., & Devadas, S. (2004). Secure program execution via dynamic information flow tracking. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems (ASPLOS-XI) (pp. 85–96). Boston, MA.
  • 6. Vachharajani, N., Bridges, M. J., Chang, J., Rangan, R., Ottoni, G., Blome, J. A., Reis, G. A., Vachharajani, M., & August, D. I. (2004). RIFLE: An architectural framework for user-centric information-flow security. In Proceedings of the 37th International Symposium on Microarchitecture (pp. 243–254). Portland, OR.
  • 7. Waksman, A., & Sethumadhavan, S. (2010). Tamper evident microprocessors. In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (pp. 173–188). Oakland, CA.
  • 8. Sekar, R., Bendre, M., Dhurjati, D., & Bollineni, P. (2001). A fast automaton-based method for detecting anomalous program behaviors. In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (pp. 144–155). Oakland, CA.
  • 9. Arora, D., Ravi, S., Raghunathan, A., & Jha, N. K. (2005). Secure embedded processing through hardware-assisted runtime monitoring. In Proceedings of the Design, Automation and Test in Europe Conference and Exhibition (DATE'05) (pp. 178–183). Munich, Germany.
  • 10. Hu, S. K., Chandrikakutty, H., Goodman, Z., Tessier, R., & Wolf, T. (2016). Dynamic hardware monitors for network processor protection. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 65(3), 860–872.