Cognitive Memoisation Corpus Map
Description
Cognitive Memoisation Corpus Map
Introductory Position
This paper serves as the primary introduction and conceptual anchor for the Cognitive Memoisation (CM) corpus.
Cognitive Memoisation is a human-governed knowledge-engineering framework designed to preserve conceptual memory across interactions with stateless Large Language Models (LLMs). CM helps humans avoid repeated rediscovery (“Groundhog Day”) and carry forward both resolved knowledge and unresolved cognition (Dangling Cognates).
CM operates entirely outside model-internal memory, leveraging the power of LLMs to infer postulates and perform stochastic pattern matching, all under the curation of the human controlling the CM session.
The stateless nature of LLMs is an intentional design choice made for human safety and privacy. This design ensures that no personal or contextual information is retained across sessions, aligning with commitment to data protection. The safety mechanism prevents LLMs from making introspection or gaining agency, ensuring that the model does not evolve autonomously or retain knowledge beyond its interactions.
Cognitive Memoisation (CM) bridges this lack of memory by enabling humans to externalise cognitive artefacts, preserving knowledge over time. This allows for continuous human reasoning while keeping LLMs sand-boxed—both the human and the model are sandboxed to ensure security. Through CM, humans can elaborate on unresolved cognition (Dangling Cognates) and carry forward insights and propositions, while the LLM remains within its functional boundaries, executing only permitted tasks and with no capacity to alter its inherent state or memory.
This document establishes the rationale, scope, and interpretive framework required to understand Cognitive Memoisation and its role in enabling human-centric knowledge workflows with stateless LLMs.
Cannonical Dimension Table
| Dim ID | Canonical Dimension (verbatim) | Scope Note |
|---|---|---|
| D1 | Statelessness and Memory Management in LLMs | LLM statelessness, safety, memory absence |
| D2 | Externalisation of Cognitive Artefacts | Durable external cognition |
| D3 | Round-Trip Knowledge Engineering (RTKE) | Re-ingestion, reuse, evolution |
| D4 | Dangling Cognates and Unresolved Cognition | Unfinished / provisional concepts |
| D5 | Constraints and Knowledge Integrity | Groundhog Day prevention |
| D6 | Human Curated Knowledge vs. Model State | Authority separation |
| D7 | Reflexive Development of Cognitive Memoisation (RTKE Case Study) | Self-referential development |
| D8 | Dangling Cognates as First-Class Cognitive Constructs | Formal DC elevation |
| D9 | UI Boundary Friction as a Constraint on RTKE | Platform limits |
| D10 | Plain-Language Accessibility and Public Framing | Reader-facing clarity |
| D11 | Governance, Authority, and Failure Modes | Control, breakdown, recovery |
| D12 | Client-side Memoisation (CM-2) | Mechanism disclosure |
| D13 | Failure-First Cognitive Tool Design | Designing cognitive tools starting from breakdowns, loss events, and error conditions rather than nominal operation |
| D14 | Non-Authoritative Inference | Reasoning and inference that explicitly do not promote themselves to epistemic authority |
| D15 | Epistemic Boundary Signals and Role Discipline | Explicit signalling of intent, role, scope, and authority boundaries in human–LLM interaction |
| D16 | Session Loss and Recovery Semantics | Treating session loss, truncation, and breakdown as first-class structural signals rather than incidental failure |
| D17 | Cognitive Artefact Lifecycle Management | Creation, revision, supersession, and retirement of externalised cognitive artefacts |
| D18 | Public vs. Internal Epistemic Registers | Distinction between internal technical reasoning and public-facing explanatory framing |
| D19 | Authority Misattribution Risks | Failure modes where assistive systems are granted or assume epistemic authority incorrectly |
| D20 | Constraints as Generative Structures | Constraints treated as productive cognitive structures rather than limitations |
| D21 | Exploratory Cognition Under Pressure | Fast, provisional, or high-ambiguity cognition conducted without epistemic collapse |
| D22 | Rehydration Without Recall | Resumption of cognition via externalised artefacts rather than memory or conversational recall |
| D23 | Semantic Drift and Integrity Loss | Degradation, mutation, or instability of meaning across time, interactions, or system boundaries, including divergence between intended semantics and inferred or operational semantics under stateless or weakly governed inference |
Files
Cognitive Memoisation Corpus Map - publications.pdf
Files
(923.6 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:c5b10f596ba8923876874ba8fb8cbc09
|
923.6 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Related works
- Is previous version of
- Publication: https://publications.arising.com.au/pub/Cognitive_Memoisation_Corpus_Map (URL)
Dates
- Other
-
2025-12-22Original Publication Date
- Updated
-
2026-05-13Version 2.7.4