Sumerians and Tatars

The essence of my hypothesis is built on several propositions:

Linguistic continuity: I put forward the assumption that the archaic roots of the Tatar language allow for a new interpretation of ancient terms. For example, words such as "Bakyr" or "Ural" are considered by me not simply as names, but as possible descriptions of technological processes of metal smelting, preserved in the language over millennia.

Numerical patterns: I have proposed a version for reading letter weights (gematria) based on the Tatar names of the letters. According to my version, this method reveals numerical sequences in the texts of "Bereshit" and the Sumerian King List that may correlate with fundamental physical data: the speed of light, cycles of solar activity, and parameters of the galactic year.

Cultural-genetic vector: Drawing on data regarding the movement of DNA (specifically, R1b) and archaeological finds of the Khvalynsk culture, I consider the probability that speakers of Proto-Turkic languages could have taken a direct part in the formation of the elites of the ancient civilizations of the Near East and North Africa.

Unified code of knowledge: The work analyzes the possibility of the existence in deep antiquity of a common system of measures and coordinates, traces of which I find in the architecture of the pyramids and geographical names, extending as far as South America.

My goal is not the proclamation of indisputable truths, but the provision of an alternative model for analyzing the past. I view my findings as food for thought and invite the reader to join me in evaluating the probability that behind linguistic coincidences and mathematical series stands a coherent system of knowledge of ancient people, which we have yet to fully reconstruct.