Published May 15, 2026 | Version 1.0
Preprint Open

Entertainment-Education as Coupling Architecture: Re-reading W. J. Brown's Audience Involvement Processes through Pask's Cybernetics and the Kelly–Lochbaum Signal-Processing Tradition

Authors/Creators

  • 1. Pip Projects, Inc. · Digital Sidewalk Lab · Independent Researcher

Description

Digital Sidewalk Series Note: this preprint is one element of a conceptual series asking how systems receive, filter, store, and transmit energy or information across domains. 

W. J. Brown's (2015) four-process model of audience involvement with media personae distinguishes transportation, parasocial interaction, identification, and worship as separable forms of media engagement. Recent meta-analytic work continues to demonstrate that mediated narratives produce persuasive effects, but those effects vary by boundary conditions, resistance, time course, and construct overlap (Oschatz & Marker, 2020; Ratcliff & Sun, 2020; Tukachinsky, Walter, & Saucier, 2020; Doré et al., 2025; Rahmani, Montano, Groves, & Green, 2025). This paper argues that the field would benefit from a more precise vocabulary for describing how mediated narratives become socially consequential through different routes.

This paper proposes a cautious cybernetic reading of Brown's four processes as coupling architectures. A coupling architecture is a structured account of how a media signal becomes consequential through a patterned arrangement of source, signal, receiver, relation, and feedback. The framework draws on two traditions: Gordon Pask's Conversation Theory (Pask, 1976) and Interaction of Actors Theory (Pask & de Zeeuw, 1992; de Zeeuw, 2001), which treat learning and meaning as emerging through structured interactions among actors rather than through one-way transmission; and the Kelly–Lochbaum acoustic-tube tradition (Kelly & Lochbaum, 1962a, 1962b; Strube, 2000), which formalizes how signals propagate through segmented systems with junctions, impedance changes, and reflections.

Files

Entertainment_Education_Kelly_Lochbaum_Coupling_Architecture.pdf

Files (323.0 kB)

Additional details

Dates

Submitted
2026-05-15

References

  • Bandura, A. (2004). Social cognitive theory for personal and social change by enabling media. In A. Singhal, M. J. Cody, E. M. Rogers, & M. Sabido (Eds.), Entertainment-education and social change: History, research, and practice (pp. 75–96). Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Brown, W. J. (2015). Examining four processes of audience involvement with media personae: Transportation, parasocial interaction, identification, and worship. Communication Theory, 25(3), 259–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12053
  • Cohen, J. (2001). Defining identification: A theoretical look at the identification of audiences with media characters. Mass Communication and Society, 4(3), 245–264. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0403_01
  • de Zeeuw, G. (2001). Interaction of actors theory. Kybernetes, 30(7/8), 971–983. https://doi.org/10.1108/03684920110396864
  • Doré, A., Rebitschek, F. G., Morello, K., Stierstädter, E., Thiemann, K. J., & Kubiak, T. (2025). A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of entertainment-education interventions on persuasive health outcomes. Scientific Reports, 15, 27939. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-11012-y
  • Duneier, M. (1999). Sidewalk. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
  • Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701–721. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.701
  • Hoffner, C., & Buchanan, M. (2005). Young adults' wishful identification with television characters: The role of perceived similarity and character attributes. Media Psychology, 7(4), 325–351. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0704_2
  • Horton, D., & Wohl, R. R. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry, 19(3), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049
  • Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. Random House.
  • Kelly, J. L., & Lochbaum, C. C. (1962a). Speech synthesis. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress on Acoustics (Paper G42, pp. 1–4). Copenhagen.
  • Kelly, J. L., & Lochbaum, C. C. (1962b). Speech synthesis. In Proceedings of the Stockholm Speech Communications Seminar. Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm.
  • Lasswell, H. D. (1948). The structure and function of communication in society. In L. Bryson (Ed.), The communication of ideas (pp. 37–51). Harper.
  • McDonough, D. B. (2025). The Digital Sidewalk: Exploring media literacy and entertainment-education in the Buildspace community [Doctoral dissertation, Regent University]. ProQuest. https://www.proquest.com/openview/029e4c00bd9e77b819ea5d4240140842/1
  • McDonough, D. B., & Brown, W. J. (2025, October). The Digital Sidewalk: Indirect learning and entertainment-education in decentralized communities. In 2025 IEEE Digital Education and MOOCs Conference (DEMOcon) (pp. 1–6). IEEE. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11282797
  • Moyer-Gusé, E. (2008). Toward a theory of entertainment persuasion: Explaining the persuasive effects of entertainment-education messages. Communication Theory, 18(3), 407–425. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.00328.x
  • Moyer-Gusé, E. (2015). Extending the examination of audience involvement with media personae: Response to Brown. Communication Theory, 25(3), 284–289. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12071
  • Oschatz, C., & Marker, C. (2020). Long-term persuasive effects in narrative communication research: A meta-analysis. Journal of Communication, 70(4), 473–496. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqaa017
  • Pask, G. (1976). Conversation theory: Applications in education and epistemology. Elsevier.
  • Pask, G. (1996). Heinz von Foerster's self-organization, the progenitor of conversation and interaction theories. Systems Research, 13(3), 349–362. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1735(199609)13:3<349::AID-SRES103>3.0.CO;2-G
  • Pask, G., & de Zeeuw, G. (1992). A succinct summary of novel theories. Working paper, University of Amsterdam.
  • Rahmani, B., Montano, B., Groves, D. W., & Green, D. P. (2025). The persuasive effects of narrative entertainment: A meta-analysis of recent experiments. Behavioural Public Policy. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2025.10010
  • Ratcliff, C. L., & Sun, Y. (2020). Overcoming resistance through narratives: Findings from a meta-analytic review. Human Communication Research, 46(4), 412–443. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqz017
  • Scott, B. (2001). Gordon Pask's conversation theory: A domain independent constructivist model of human knowing. Foundations of Science, 6(4), 343–360. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011667022540
  • Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press.
  • Singhal, A., & Rogers, E. M. (1999). Entertainment-education: A communication strategy for social change. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410607119
  • Slater, M. D., & Rouner, D. (2002). Entertainment-education and elaboration likelihood: Understanding the processing of narrative persuasion. Communication Theory, 12(2), 173–191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2002.tb00265.x
  • Strube, H. W. (2000). The meaning of the Kelly–Lochbaum acoustic-tube model. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 108(4), 1850–1855. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1308046
  • Tilak, S., Manning, T., Glassman, M., Pangaro, P., & Scott, B. C. E. (2024). Gordon Pask's conversation theory and interaction of actors theory: Research to practice. Enacting Cybernetics, 2, Article 11. https://doi.org/10.58695/ec.11
  • Tukachinsky, R., & Stever, G. (2019). Theorizing development of parasocial engagement. Communication Theory, 29(3), 297–318. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qty032
  • Tukachinsky, R., Walter, N., & Saucier, C. J. (2020). Antecedents and effects of parasocial relationships: A meta-analysis. Journal of Communication, 70(6), 868–894. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqaa034
  • Wiener, N. (1948). Cybernetics: Or control and communication in the animal and the machine. MIT Press.