Published July 3, 2017
| Version v1
Dataset
Open
Tab. 3 in Is coexistence between non-native and native Erythrinidae species mediated by niche differentiation or environmental filtering? A case study in the upper Paraná River floodplain
Authors/Creators
- 1. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia de Ambientes Aquáticos Continentais, Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Av. Colombo 5790, 87020 - 900 Maringá, PR, Brazil
- 2. Universidade de São Paulo, USP, Ribeirão Preto. Av. Bandeirantes, 3900, 14049 - 900 Monte Alegre, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil
- 3. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia de Ambientes Aquáticos Continentais, Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Av. Colombo 5790, 87020 - 900 Maringá, PR, Brazil & Núcleo de Pesquisas em Limnologia, Ictiologia eAquicultura, Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Av. Colombo 5790, 87020 - 900 Maringá, PR, Brazil
Description
Tab. 3. Co-occurrence in terms of number and proportion (in parentheses) of each pair of Erythrinidae species in the upper Paraná River floodplain. Valid comparisons can be made only between the rows of a single column.
| Species | H. unitaeniatus | H. mbigua | Hoplias sp. B | Hoplias cf. malabaricus |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Floodplain | ||||
| H. unitaeniatus | 63 (100%) | 41 (15%) | 47 (23%) | 38 (29%) |
| H. mbigua | 41 (65%) | 271 (100%) | 173 (84%) | 114 (88%) |
| Hoplias sp. B | 47 (75%) | 173 (64%) | 206 (100%) | 105 (81%) |
| Hoplias cf. malabaricus | 38 (60%) | 114 (42%) | 105 (51%) | 129 (100%) |
| Baía system | ||||
| H. unitaeniatus | 33 (100%) | 23 (21%) | 28 (28%) | 19 (30%) |
| H. mbigua | 23 (70%) | 109 (100%) | 91 (90%) | 60 (94%) |
| Hoplias sp. B | 28 (85%) | 91 (83%) | 101 (100%) | 57 (89%) |
| Hoplias cf. malabaricus | 19 (58%) | 60 (55%) | 57 (56%) | 64 (100%) |
| Ivinhema system | ||||
| H. unitaeniatus | 23 (100%) | 12 (15%) | 14 (21%) | 14 (32%) |
| H. mbigua | 12 (52%) | 80 (100%) | 50 (74%) | 34 (77%) |
| Hoplias sp. B | 14 (61%) | 50 (63%) | 68 (100%) | 37 (84%) |
| Hoplias cf. malabaricus | 14 (61%) | 34 (43%) | 37 (54%) | 44 (100%) |
| Paraná system | ||||
| H. unitaeniatus | 7 (100%) | 6 (7%) | 5 (14%) | 5 (24%) |
| H. mbigua | 6 (86%) | 82 (100%) | 32 (86%) | 20 (95%) |
| Hoplias sp. B | 5 (71%) | 32 (39%) | 37 (100%) | 11 (52%) |
| Hoplias cf. malabaricus | 5 (71%) | 20 (24%) | 11 (30%) | 21 (100%) |
Notes
Published as part of Pereira, Larissa S., Mise, Fábio T., Tencatt, Luiz F. C., Baumgartner, Matheus T. & Agostinho, Angelo A., 2017, Neotropical Ichthyology 15 (2) on page e 160142, DOI: 10.1590/1982-0224-20160142, http://zenodo.org/record/20127853
Files
Files
(3.0 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:92f88ed0783268a0932f8ba259b1ab27
|
3.0 kB | Download |
System files
(11.5 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:dac4409426cfa6e20860f28fad194e7c
|
11.5 kB | Download |
Additional details
Identifiers
Related works
- Is part of
- Journal article: 10.1590/1982-0224-20160142 (DOI)
- Journal article: urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:1409FFC1FFB42342FFCEFFD4FFC1FF93 (LSID)
- Journal article: http://zenodo.org/record/20127853 (URL)
- Journal article: http://publication.plazi.org/id/1409FFC1FFB42342FFCEFFD4FFC1FF93 (URL)