Distributed Presence III: Ontological Unity in Physics
Description
This paper develops the Distributed Presence (DP) framework as a conceptual programme for rethinking the ontology of fundamental physics. Rather than treating space, time, matter, field, and interaction as irreducibly distinct categories, it explores whether they can be understood as emergent aspects of a single relational substrate. The analysis is organized around a three-level ontological hierarchy: a structural level of formally differentiated possibilities, a level of actualization through which such possibilities are successively realized, and an emergent level at which familiar temporal, spatial, and dynamical regularities appear.
Within this framework, time is interpreted not as a primitive background parameter but as the order of actualization, while space is approached as a higher-level geometric representation of stable neighbourhood relations within the underlying structure. Motion is correspondingly reinterpreted as redistribution of presence across neighbouring configurations rather than translation through a pre-given container. On this basis, the paper proposes a unified reading of space, field, and mass as different organizational regimes of one underlying reality, distinguished by relative density and stability rather than by ontological kind.
The paper also offers a cautious reinterpretation of interaction: what physics describes as force is treated, at the conceptual level, as a systematic bias in re-actualization rather than as an external agency. Finally, it considers whether certain relativistic regularities may be understood as emergent from structural constraints on succession and propagation. The aim throughout is not to present a complete alternative physical theory, but to articulate a coherent ontological framework that may contribute to philosophical discussions of emergent spacetime, temporal order, and unity in the foundations of physics.
Notes
Files
DP III-Znodo.pdf
Files
(1.4 MB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:b70e51f01604886ef8ade251b3875a57
|
1.4 MB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Additional titles
- Alternative title
- Emergent Spacetime, Dynamics, and the Unification of Forces
Related works
- Is part of
- Preprint: 10.5281/zenodo.20095269 (DOI)
- Journal: 10.5281/zenodo.20094783 (DOI)
References
- [1] Nasiri Vatan, S. (2026). "Distributed Presence: A Structural-Ontological Framework for Quantum Mechanics," International Journal of Quantum Foundations, vol. 12 (2026). https://ijqf.org/archives/8001
- [2] Nasiri Vatan, S. (2026). "Distributed Presence: A Structural-Ontological Framework for Quantum Mechanics," Zenodo Archive. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20095269
- [3] Ladyman, J., & Ross, D. (2007). Every thing must go: Metaphysics naturalized. Oxford university press. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/every-thing-must-go-9780199276196
- [4] Barbour, J. (2001). The end of time: The next revolution in physics. Oxford university press. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-end-of-time-9780195145922
- [5] Rovelli, C. (2004). Quantum Gravity. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511755804
- [6] Rovelli, C. (2019). The order of time. Penguin. https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/547804/the-order-of-time-by-carlo-rovelli/
- [7] Callender, C. (2017). What Makes Time Special? Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.59350/22eq3-4h816
- [8] Wallace, D. (2019). The quantum measurement problem: State of play. In D. Rickles (Ed.), The Routledge Companion to the Philosophy of Physics (pp. 16–43). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.0712.0149
- [9] Esfeld, M., Deckert, D.-A., & Lazarovici, D. (2017). "Quantum Humeanism, or: Physicalism without Properties." The Philosophical Quarterly, 67(269), 30–52. https://doi.org/10.1093/pq/pqu030
- [10] Wallace, D. (2019). The Emergent Multiverse. Oxford university press. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-emergent-multiverse-9780199546961
- [11] Maudlin, T. (2012). Philosophy of Physics: Space and Time. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400842339
- [12] Huggett, N., & Wüthrich, C. (2013). Emergent spacetime and empirical (in) coherence. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B, 44(3), 276-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2012.11.003
- [13] Van Raamsdonk, M. (2010). "Building up spacetime with quantum entanglement." General Relativity and Gravitation. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-010-1034-0
- [14] Oriti, D. (2017). "The universe as a quantum gravity condensate." Comptes Rendus Physique. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crhy.2017.02.003
- [15] Rovelli, C., & Vidotto, F. (2014). Covariant Loop Quantum Gravity. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781107706910
- [16] Knox, E. (2019). Physical relativity from a functionalist perspective. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B, 67, 118-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2017.09.008
- [17] Bombelli, L., Lee, J., Meyer, D., & Sorkin, R. (1987). "Space-time as a causal set." Physical Review Letters. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.59.521
- [18] Wald, R. (1984). General Relativity. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226870373.001.0001
- [19] Rovelli, C. (2018). Space is blue and birds fly through it. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 376(2123), 20170312. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2017.0312
- [20] Dennett, D. (1991). Real Patterns. Journal of Philosophy. https://doi.org/10.2307/2027085
- [21] Price, H. (1997). Time's Arrow and Archimedes' Point. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195117981.001.0001
- [22] Barbour, J., Koslowski, T., & Mercati, F. (2014). "Identification of a gravitational arrow of time." Physical Review Letters, 113(18), 181101. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.113.181101
- [23] Carroll, S. M. (2016). The Big Picture: On the Origins of Life, Meaning, and the Universe Itself. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf6858
- [24] Ismael, J. (2016). How Physics Makes Us Free. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190269449.001.0001
- [25] Padmanabhan, T. (2010). "Thermodynamical aspects of gravity: new insights." Reports on Progress in Physics, 73(4), 046901. https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/73/4/046901
- [26] Butterfield, J., & Isham, C. (2001). Spacetime and the philosophical challenge of quantum gravity. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511612909.003
- [27] Einstein, A. (1970). On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies. ScienceDirct. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-006995-1.50014-4
- [28] Dowker, F. (2005). Causal sets and the deep structure of spacetime. In 100 Years Of Relativity: space-time structure: Einstein and beyond (pp. 445-464). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218271805006186
- [29] Busch, P., Lahti, P., & Mittelstaedt, P. (1991). The Quantum Theory of Measurement. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-13844-1_3
- [30] Teller, P. (1986). Relational holism and quantum mechanics. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjps/37.1.71
- [31] Rugh, S., & Zinkernagel, H. (2002). The quantum vacuum and the cosmological constant problem. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B https://doi.org/10.1016/s1355-2198(02)00033-3
- [32] Maudlin, T. (2019). Philosophy of Physics: Quantum Theory. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691190679
- [33] French, S. (2014). The structure of the world: Metaphysics and representation. Oxford University Press (UK). https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzu191
- [34] French, S., & Ladyman, J. (2003). Remodelling structural realism. Synthese. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1024156116636
- [35] Weinberg, S. (1995). The Quantum Theory of Fields. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139644167
- [36] Lam, V., & Wüthrich, C. (2018). Spacetime is as spacetime does. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B, 64, 39-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2018.04.003