Published April 2, 2026 | Version v1

Neoholosticha Ghosh, Bharti, Terza, Bhutiani, Pathania & Kumar, 2026, gen. nov.

  • 1. Zoological Survey of India, Prani Vigyan Bhawan, M-Block, New Alipore, Kolkata 700053, India. & Department of Zoology, University of Calcutta, Kolkata 700073, West Bengal, India.
  • 2. Zoological Survey of India, Prani Vigyan Bhawan, M-Block, New Alipore, Kolkata 700053, India.
  • 3. School of Bioscience and Veterinary Medicine, University of Camerino, Via Gentile III da Varano, I- 62032 Camerino (MC), Italy.
  • 4. Department of Zoology and Environmental Science, Gurukula Kangri (deemed to be University), Haridwar, India.
  • 5. High Altitude Regional Centre, Zoological Survey of India, Saproon 173211, Solan, Himachal Pradesh, India.

Description

Genus Neoholosticha gen. nov.

urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: CBED5600-CDC6-4757-92E6-9453F0EFF1BA

Type species

Neoholosticha vikali gen. et sp. nov.

Diagnosis

Holostichidae with a continuous adoral zone of membranelles, frontoterminal cirri present, transverse cirri fewer than the midventral cirral pairs, more than four dorsal kineties, and multiple caudal cirri present.

Etymology

The genus-group name is a composite of the Greek prefix ‘neo - ’ (meaning ‘new’) and the generic name Holosticha, referring to the similar frontoventral ciliature of Holosticha and Neoholosticha. Feminine gender.

Comparison of Neoholosticha gen. nov. with similar genera

Among the 13 genera of the family Holostichidae, Neoholosticha gen. nov. is mainly distinguished by the presence of 6–8 dorsal kineties and 7–12 caudal cirri (Berger 2006; Li et al. 2017).

The genus Acuholosticha differs from Neoholosticha gen. nov. by having a narrowly rounded (vs flattened) posterior end, pretransverse ventral cirri present or absent (vs absent), and two to four (vs six to eight) dorsal kineties. Adumbratosticha is distinguished by an elongate rectangular body with a rounded posterior end (vs ellipsoidal with a flattened posterior end), fewer caudal cirri (often two) than dorsal kineties, and in some species vestigial caudal cirri (vs always more caudal cirri than dorsal kineties). It also has relatively short, almost straight, non-intersecting (vs long and optically intersecting) undulating membranes, and pretransverse ventral cirri present or absent (vs absent). Afrothrix differs by possessing a bipartite (vs continuous) adoral zone of membranelles and the absence (vs presence) of caudal cirri. Anteholosticha can be separated by having transverse cirri usually fewer than midventral pairs (vs invariably two) and by the absence (vs presence) of caudal cirri. Caudikeronopsis differs by the presence (vs absence) of pretransverse ventral cirri and occurrence in marine (vs terrestrial) habitats. Diaxonella is distinguished by having two or more (vs a single) left marginal rows. Extraholosticha differs by the presence (vs absence) of a short cirral row between the left frontal cirrus and the undulating membranes. Holosticha differs, inter alia, by having a gap between the proximal and distal parts of the adoral zone of membranelles (vs continuous adoral zone), short and parallel (vs long and optically intersecting) undulating membranes, transverse cirri equal to or slightly fewer than midventral pairs (vs invariably two), and the absence (vs presence) of caudal cirri. Limnoholosticha is distinguished by an elliptical to wide elliptical body (vs slender elliptical), five to eight (vs invariably two) transverse cirri, and occurrence in stagnant inland waters (vs terrestrial habitats). Multiholosticha differs by the presence (vs absence) of pretransverse ventral cirri, seven to twelve (vs invariably two) transverse cirri, and a freshwater (vs terrestrial) habitat. Periholosticha can be separated by having a bipartite (vs continuous) adoral zone, the buccal cirrus absent (vs present), and midventral pairs that extend only shortly (vs extending almost to the transverse cirri). Psammomitra differs by its tripartite (vs ellipsoidal) body form, short and parallel (vs long and intersecting) undulating membranes, and the absence (vs presence) of caudal cirri. Pseudoamphisiella is distinguished by the absence (vs presence) of frontoterminal cirri and by having multiple (vs invariably two) transverse cirri.

Notes

Published as part of Ghosh, Arnab, Bharti, Daizy, Terza, Antonietta La, Bhutiani, Rakesh, Pathania, Prakash Chand & Kumar, Santosh, 2026, Unveiling soil ciliate diversity: Taxonomy of two novel hypotrich ciliates (Alveolata: Ciliophora) from agricultural soil in Mathura, India, pp. 142-163 in European Journal of Taxonomy 1048 on pages 153-159, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2026.1048.3239, http://zenodo.org/record/20056532

Files

Files (4.2 kB)

Name Size
md5:33aa713d16ab1f7c8d4d1f7623dc8239
4.2 kB Download

System files (17.5 kB)

Name Size
md5:ac6c17ef37c995a890a832d7af951932
17.5 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

References

  • Berger H. 2006. Monograph of the Urostyloidea (Ciliophora, Hypotrichia). Monographiae Biologicae 85: 1-1304. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5273-1
  • Li F., Lyu Z., Li Y., Fan X., Al-Farraj S. A., Shao C. & Berger H. 2017. Morphology, morphogenesis, and molecular phylogeny of Uroleptus (Caudiholosticha) stueberi (Foissner, 1987) comb. nov. (Ciliophora, Hypotricha), and reclassification of the remaining Caudiholosticha species. European Journal of Protistology 59: 82-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejop.2016.08.007