ORISOM - A System of Outcome Prediction
Authors/Creators
Description
Abstract
This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the Outcome Recurrence & Informational Subset Oscillation Mapping (ORISOM-F) framework, a novel system for sequential outcome prediction. Developed iteratively across two distinct AI environments—initially in ChatGPT for foundational concepts and subsequently optimized in Claude AI for empirical validation and advanced architectural integration—ORISOM-F challenges conventional probabilistic models by emphasizing empirically derived adjusted probabilities and macro-behavioral patterns over theoretical expectations. The study details the system's evolution from a basic lottery prediction engine to a sophisticated multi-layered architecture incorporating concepts from regime-switching models [1], attention mechanisms in large language models [2], and chaos theory. We delineate the unique contributions of ORISOM-F, including its Degree of Certainty (DC) framework, specialized outcome analysis engines (e.g., PP-BPC, MP-RP/C), and the Operational Containment Multi-Engine (OCME) for system unification. A comparative analysis highlights the strengths and weaknesses of AI-driven development, demonstrating how iterative refinement can transform initial conceptual designs into empirically validated predictive systems. The paper concludes with a discussion of future directions, including the planned evolution towards ORACLE-QC.
| signature | action | n | D=3 ROI | reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|
(0,0,3) |
remove | 23 | +595.7% | false positive — was skipping profitable draws |
(2,2,0) |
remove | 16 | +1400% | false positive — highest single-sig ROI in dataset |
(0,0,2) |
add new | 18 | −100% | zero hits confirmed |
(1,2,0) |
add new | 20 | −100% | zero hits confirmed |
(0,1,3) |
add new | 16 | −100% | zero hits confirmed |
(0,2,1) |
add new | 17 | −100% | zero hits confirmed |
(2,1,0) |
add new | 14 | −100% | zero hits confirmed |
(2,0,2) |
add new | 15 | −100% | zero hits confirmed |
(3,0,1) |
add new | 15 | −100% | zero hits confirmed |
(2,2,2) |
add new | 12 | −100% | zero hits confirmed (n borderline) |
(1,3,2) |
retain | 12 | −100% | already in set — confirmed negative |
(0,2,2) |
rare — keep | <12 | — | insufficient n; retain pending |
(1,2,3) |
rare — keep | <12 | — | insufficient n; retain pending |
(1,3,3) |
rare — keep | <12 | — | insufficient n; retain pending |
(2,3,0) |
rare — keep | <12 | — | insufficient n; retain pending |
(3,2,1) |
rare — keep | <12 | — | insufficient n; retain pending |
(1,1,1) n=99 · +546% · most reliable (0,1,0) n=53 · +504% (1,1,0) n=43 · +644% (0,1,1) n=43 · +272% borderline (1,0,1) n=50 · +220% borderline