Published May 1, 2026 | Version v1
Dataset Open

Trauma-Informed School Environment Models: Scoping Review Dataset

Authors/Creators

  • 1. V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University

Description

This dataset contains the complete data pipeline from a scoping review examining models of trauma-informed school environments in general secondary education (K-12). The review was conducted in accordance with the Arksey & O'Malley (2005) framework and reported following the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR; Tricco et al., 2018).

Files

1. raw_search_results.xlsx — 1,487 records

Raw results exported from the Primo platform (University of Minnesota Libraries) prior to any filtering. Includes all records retrieved by the search string ("trauma-informed") AND ("school") AND ("system"), conducted in April 2026 with filters: language = English; years = 2020–2025; document type = articles; subject field = Education.

Column Description
Record_ID Unique record identifier
Title Article title
Author(s) Author names
Journal/Source Journal or publication source
Year Publication year
Language Publication language
Abstract Full abstract
Subjects Subject headings assigned by the database
Permalink Stable link to the record

2. screening_data_full.xlsx — 523 records

Records remaining after automated first-level filtering against pre-defined exclusion criteria (early childhood education, higher education, clinical interventions outside school context, non-school environments). Includes screening decisions and rationale for each record.

Column Description
Record_ID Unique record identifier
Title Article title
Author(s) Author names
Journal/Source Journal or publication source
Year Publication year
Abstract Full abstract
Decision (include/exclude) Screening decision: yes = include, no = exclude
Rationale Reason for exclusion or confirmation of inclusion

Note: 4 duplicate records were identified and removed prior to second-level screening, resulting in 519 unique records screened by title and abstract. Of these, 40 were selected for full-text assessment; 4 were excluded due to unavailable full text, yielding a final sample of 36 included studies.

3. charting_data_included.xlsx — 36 records

Data charting matrix for all studies included in the final analysis. Extracted using a pre-developed charting form.

Column Description
Record_ID Unique record identifier
Title Article title
Author(s) Author names
Journal/Source Journal or publication source
Year Publication year
Country Country of study context
Abstract Full abstract
Document_Type Methodological type (empirical, conceptual, review, etc.)
Model_Name Name of the trauma-informed model or approach identified
Key_Components Key structural components of the model
Level_of_Intervention Domain: individual / institutional / systemic

Search and Selection Summary

Stage n
Records retrieved (raw search) 1,487
After automated first-level filtering 523
After deduplication 519
After second-level screening (titles and abstracts) 40
After full-text assessment (excluded: no full text available) 36

Methods

  • Review type: Scoping review
  • Framework: Arksey & O'Malley (2005)
  • Reporting standard: PRISMA-ScR (Tricco et al., 2018)
  • Search platform: Primo, University of Minnesota Libraries (lib.umn.edu)
  • Search date: April 2026
  • Search string: ("trauma-informed") AND ("school") AND ("system")
  • Screening: Conducted by one researcher; first-level filtering was automated using pre-defined keyword-based exclusion criteria; second-level screening of titles and abstracts was conducted manually
  • Data charting: Conducted by one researcher using a pre-developed matrix
  • Critical appraisal: Not conducted, consistent with scoping review methodology

AI and Tool Disclosure

AI assistance (Claude, Anthropic) was used at multiple stages: performing automated first-level filtering, preparing the data charting matrix, and organizing the data for storage. All decisions, inclusion/exclusion criteria, second-level screening, data interpretation, and final text were determined and verified by the human researcher.

Files

Files (1.7 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:557d6f676ca4f52b8311447acc7f3ee3
40.1 kB Download
md5:1a8857e874485b2f15c69c69812fbe3a
1.3 MB Download
md5:25c2236212e63dca756186a5d4b98cb3
358.3 kB Download

Additional details

References

  • Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
  • Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O'Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., Moher, D., Peters, M. D. J., Horsley, T., Weeks, L., Hempel, S., Akl, E. A., Chang, C., McGowan, J., Stewart, L., Hartling, L., Aldcroft, A., Wilson, M. G., Garritty, C., … Straus, S. E. (2018). PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467–473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850