Platform-Independent Performance Validation of NS-2.35: A Comparative Study of Native and Virtualized Environments
Authors/Creators
- 1. Associate Professor in Computer Engineering & Applications at IES College of Technology, Bhopal, (Madhya Pradesh), India.
- 1. Research Scholar, Department of Computer Science and Information Technology, Rabindranath Tagore University, Raisen, (Madhya Pradesh), India.
- 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science and Information Technology, Rabindranath Tagore University, Raisen, (Madhya Pradesh), India.
- 3. Associate Professor in Computer Engineering & Applications at IES College of Technology, Bhopal, (Madhya Pradesh), India.
Description
Abstract: The paper presents a comprehensive experimental study that evaluates the Network Simulator 2 (NS-2.35) on both native Linux systems and VMware-based virtualised environments. Researchers use NS-2.35 as a standard tool for testing Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (MANETs). The researchers face challenges because they must install their software to achieve functionality across multiple operating systems. The research study provides a complete installation guide and troubleshooting instructions, and tests whether different execution environments affect simulation results. The researchers create a MANET scenario using the Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) routing protocol to conduct identical tests in both environments. The assessment uses Throughput, End-to-End Delay, Packet Delivery Ratio (PDR), and Packet Loss Ratio (PLR) as performance indicators to evaluate node densities of 20, 30, and 50. The researchers conduct multiple experiments and analyse them using the mean and standard deviation (Mean ± SD) to obtain statistically reliable results. The testing results show that all performance measurements remain the same across both native systems and virtualised environments, proving that NS-2.35 delivers platform-independent performance that remains constant under the same system conditions. The test runs produce stable simulation results because two tests show extremely low standard deviation values. The simulation results remain accurate because execution efficiency and system performance differences between the two systems result in only minor discrepancies in the test results. The study concludes that researchers can use both native Linux and virtualised environments for NS-2.35 simulations, as virtualisation preserves simulation fidelity. This work validates the cross-platform performance of NS-2.35, thereby building trust in simulation research findings.
Files
E126115060526.pdf
Files
(1.2 MB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:2d81b95ee44d6ab3040f98abcf121fad
|
1.2 MB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.35940/ijies.E1261.13040426
- EISSN
- 2319-9598
Dates
- Accepted
-
2026-04-15Manuscript received on 04 March 2026 | First Revised Manuscript received on 20 March 2026 | Second Revised Manuscript received on 05 April 2026 | Manuscript Accepted on 15 April 2026 | Manuscript published on 30 April 2026
References
- Abdullah, A.M., An efficient approach for minimizing control packets and enhancing route stability in mobile ad-hoc networks. The Journal of Supercomputing, 2026. 82(5): p. 305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227- 026-08480-y
- Irani, F., VSIM: a new simulation and performance evaluation tool for MANET and VANET. International Journal of Information Technology, 2024: p. 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41870-024-02223-z
- Shakya, A., S. Ali, and P. Nand. Simulation-Based Performance Analysis of MANET Routing Protocols: Proactive vs Reactive, in 2025 Optical Communication, Photonics, Telecommunications, and Intelligent Machine Applications (OPTIMA). 2025. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/OPTIMA67660.2025.11380316
- Jain, S.M., Linux Containers and Virtualization. A Kernel Perspective, 2020: p. 2020-10. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-4842- 9768-1
- Selim, I.M., et al. (2025) – MANET Routing Protocols' Performance Assessment under Dynamic Network Conditions, Applied Sciences, 15(6): 2891. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15062891
- Smera, C. and J. Sandeep. Networks simulation: Research-based implementation using tools and approaches. In 2022, the IEEE 3rd Global Conference for Advancement in Technology (GCAT). 2022. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/GCAT55367.2022.9972119
- Suutari, L., Virtualized learning environment for network security using infrastructure as code practices. 2024, L. Suutari. https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:oulu-202412177352
- Dorathy, I. and M. Chandrasekaran, Simulation tools for mobile ad hoc networks: a survey. Journal of applied research and technology, 2018. 16(5): p. 437-445.https://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?pid=S166564232018000500437&script=sci_arttext&tlng=en
- Behura, A., A. Kumar, and P.K. Jain, A comparative performance analysis of vehicular routing protocols in intelligent transportation systems. Telecommunication Systems, 2025. 88(1): p. 26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-024-01243-1
- Bagirathan, K., N. Saravanan, and K. Vijayabhaskar, An intelligent recurrent neural network-driven secured routing protocol for vehicular ad hoc networks. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2025. 317: p. 113371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2025.113371
- Collins, A.J., F. Sabz Ali Pour, and C.A. Jordan, Past challenges and the future of discrete event simulation. The Journal of Defence Modelling and Simulation, 2023. 20(3): p. 351-369.https://doi.org/10.1177/15485129211067175
- Lee, C., H. Kwon, and Y.I. Lee, OPC UA-based three-layer architecture for aggregated microgrids integrating edge cloud computing and IEC 62264. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 2025: p. 100965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2025.100965
- Williams, M., Coordinated Land Use and Transportation Planning–A Sketch Modelling Approach. 2010. . http://hdl.handle.net/1807/25512
- Hess, K., Practical Linux system administration: a guide to installation, configuration, and management. 2023: " O'Reilly Media, Inc.". https://books.google.co.in/books?hl=en&lr=&id=UVG6EAAAQBAJ& oi=fnd&pg=PT10&dq=Hess,+K.,+Practical+Linux+system+administra tion:+a+guide+to+installation,+configuration,+and+management.+202 3:+%22+O%27Reilly+Media,+Inc.%22.&ots=PYoKX6PyuS&sig=rdoi VNoJFJz05Yq2vTuZaKfLbpU&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
- Rozehkhani, S.M., F. Mahan, and W. Pedrycz, Efficient cloud data centre: An adaptive framework for dynamic Virtual Machine Consolidation. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 2024. 226: p. 103885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2024.103885
- Yoginath, S.B. and K.S. Perumalla. Optimized hypervisor scheduler for parallel discrete event simulations on virtual machine platforms. in SimuTools. 2013.
- Kumar, S. and S. Das, Using Ansible Playbooks to Port Non-cloudNative Applications Across Linux Distributions: A Novel Approach. SN Computer Science, 2023. 4(5): p. 644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979- 023-02030-6
- Ma, Y., et al., A survey of DDoS attack and defence technologies in multi-access edge computing. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2024. 12(2): p. 1428-1452. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2024.3490897
- Hemanand, D., et al., A secure AODV algorithm based on malicious nodes detection in flying ad-hoc networks. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 2026: p. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-026-03272-2
- Khan, H., et al. Performance Evaluation of DSR, AODV and MP-OLSR Routing Protocols Using NS-2 Simulator in MANETs. in International Conference on Cognitive Computing and Cyber Physical Systems. 2023. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48891-7_10