BU10 Experimental Morphisms under Boundary Consistency

Abstract

This paper develops Experimental Morphisms under Boundary Consistency as the experimental extension of the single-universe boundary framework. Its central claim is that experimental configurations are not neutral observational arrangements, but morphic operators whose admissibility depends on boundary consistency. Let B_U denote global boundary consistency over the total domain U. Under this condition, an experiment is formally treated as a morphism that carries a generated state into a boundary-consistent settlement structure. Experimental variation therefore does not license ontological branching, independent subdomains, or drifting validity conditions. It remains internal to one fixed admissibility background.

On this basis, the paper formalizes boundary-consistent experiment as a constrained morphic process governed by generation, matching, settlement, and admissibility preservation. The aim is not to redescribe every laboratory procedure in detail, but to establish a strict criterion: an experiment is legitimate only insofar as it preserves single-universe standing while producing locally discriminable outcomes. This immediately reclassifies a wide range of interpretive excesses. Apparent branching, observer-conditioned reality, and experimental narratives that tacitly require boundary drift lose ontological standing. Experimental anomalies are therefore relocated from universe-level fracture to internal morphic structure, residual mismatch, or implementation-level limitation. The result is a compact experimental grammar in which admissible experimentation becomes a structured transformation within one globally fixed boundary regime, rather than evidence for ontological multiplication.