Evaluation 1 of "Population ethical intuitions"

This is a peer evaluation of "Population ethical intuitions" submitted to The Unjournal. **Evaluator abstract:** Highly policy relevant, original research with clear hypothesis tests and valid statistical analyses. Biases and framing effects are mitigated but remain difficult to avoid in such surveys. Some results (e.g. the negative utilitarian judgments and a lack of asymmetry) seem to be contradictory. One possible explanation for an apparent contradictory result is not addressed. --- The Unjournal organizes public, journal-independent evaluations of research relevant to global priorities, providing quantitative ratings and qualitative feedback from expert reviewers. Evaluation summary (all evaluations + ratings): https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19772703 PubPub version: https://unjournal.pubpub.org/pub/e1popintuitions Website: https://unjournal.org