Exploring the Ecological Discourse of Dark Ecology as a Radical Form of Posthumanism
Authors/Creators
Description
This paper takes a close look at Timothy Morton’s idea of “Dark Ecology” and treats it as a diverse strand in recent environmental philosophy. Morton steps away from the habit of putting human concerns at the center and from fixed images of nature, and instead offers a looser model that unsettles familiar ecological thinking. The discussion places this model next to other philosophical and environmental lines of thought and shows how this comparison changes ideas about ecological awareness and about how we teach environmental understanding. Morton’s work makes space for elements that seem non-rational at first and relaxes the strict hold of scientific reasoning without giving up a strong environmental ethic. In this way, the paper points toward new cultural and political possibilities for how people relate to the more-than-human world.
This study looks at the main ideas of “dark ecology” as a central notion in posthumanist thought. It explains the ontological bases of this notion, which question human-centered thinking and strict holistic models of nature. The study then places dark ecology beside other lines of philosophical and ecological work to show where it deflects and how its claims take a different shape. Special attention is given to the founder's unique perspective on environmental awareness and how the concept of environmental education is interpreted within this framework. The study notes the founder's intent to move away from rational, scientific views of the environment, advocating instead for a more intuitive, eco-conscious approach to policy.
Examining and shedding light on this vision in this research may reveal other potential or horizons to create a more well-balanced relationship with nature through particular attention is paid to the concept of "Hyper-objects”; worldwide environmental happenings that show the interconnection of all living things. The pertinence of more study on the moral and ethical-sides of dark ecology for the creation of a more sustainable and objective future is spotlighted.
Files
11. arkan.pdf
Files
(1.1 MB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:36a07d2cc4882c595e48600e71a50262
|
1.1 MB | Preview Download |
Additional details
References
- Bryant, L. R. (2019). The democracy of objects. Gile Press. Haraway, D. (2020). Remaining in trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Gile Press. Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press. Harman, G. (2020). Art and objects. Polity Press. Morton, T. (2017). Humankind: Solidarity with nonhuman people. Verso. Morton, T. (2018). Dark ecology: For a logic of future coexistence. Columbia University Press. Morton, T. (2019). Hyper-objects: Philosophy and ecology after the end of the world. Gile Press. Morton, T. (2022a). Become eco-friendly (2nd ed.). Ad Marginem Press. Morton, T. (2022b). The human race: Solidarity with nonhuman people (E. Bondal, Trans.). Gaidar Institute Publishing House. Tsing, A. L. (2015). The mushroom at the end of the world: On the possibility of life in capitalist ruins. Princeton University Press.