Published April 23, 2026 | Version v1

Nowhere to hide: Ensemble of Small Models exposes climate vulnerability and conservation gaps for an extremely rare troglobitic beetle genus

Authors/Creators

  • 1. College of Life Sciences, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, China

Description

Subterranean ecosystems harbor a high diversity of narrow-range endemics, yet they remain largely invisible in conservation planning, representing a major bias that may trigger irreversible biodiversity loss under rapid climate change. This study applied an Ensemble of Small Models (ESMs) framework, coupled with a target-group background strategy, to assess the climate vulnerability and protection status of Zopherobatrus Yin & Li, 2015 (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Pselaphinae), an extremely rare troglobitic rove beetle genus endemic to the karst landscapes of southwest China. Habitat suitability was projected under current conditions and across the 2050s and 2070s (SSP1-2.6 and SSP5-8.5). Under current conditions, highly suitable habitat is strictly confined to specific karst terrains; future projections reveal that the retained habitat ratio declines to only 24.0–48.2%, while the conventional net area change metric (–36.4% to –63.1%) masks functional habitat loss because climatically "gained" areas remain ecologically inaccessible to this dispersal-limited group, and the projected range centroid shifts northwestward by up to 141 km. A systematic gap analysis, cross-referenced with national and provincial nature reserves, showed that only 2.6% of current suitable habitat is formally protected, all known localities fall entirely outside reserves, and 95.9% of identified climate refugia lack any legal protection. These findings quantified a "double jeopardy" for subterranean biodiversity: simultaneous habitat erosion driven by climate change combined with a near-total absence of formal protection. The establishment of targeted micro-reserves centered on climate refugia, the formal inclusion of Zopherobatrus in national protection lists, and the integration of subterranean fauna into regional conservation frameworks are recommended.

Files

SB_article_190752.pdf

Files (4.3 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:83f6a94a7540e263e0a23f9de1a69338
4.1 MB Preview Download
md5:752284bb09e88875e82a2c5ed7dcd8a7
167.8 kB Preview Download

Linked records

Additional details

References

  • Allouche O, Steinitz O, Rotem D, Rosenfeld A, Kadmon R (2008) Incorporating distance constraints into species distribution models. Journal of Applied Ecology 45(2): 599–609. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01445.x
  • Allouche O, Tsoar A, Kadmon R (2006) Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models: prevalence, kappa and the true skill statistic (TSS). Journal of Applied Ecology 43(6): 1223–1232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01214.x
  • Araújo MB, Guisan A (2006) Five (or so) challenges for species distribution modelling. Journal of Biogeography 33(10): 1677–1688. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01584.x
  • Araújo MB, New M (2007) Ensemble forecasting of species distributions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 22(1): 42–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2006.09.010
  • Austin MP (2002) Spatial prediction of species distribution: an interface between ecological theory and statistical modelling. Ecological Modelling 157(2–3): 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00205-3
  • Austin MP, Van Niel KP (2011) Improving species distribution models for climate change studies: variable selection and scale. Journal of Biogeography 38(1): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2010.02416.x
  • Bachman S, Moat J, Hill AW, de la Torre J, Scott B (2011) Supporting Red List threat assessments with GeoCAT: geospatial conservation assessment tool. ZooKeys 150: 117–126. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.150.2109
  • Badino G (2010) Underground meteorology – "What's the weather underground?" Acta Carsologica 39(3): 427–448. https://doi.org/10.3986/ac.v39i3.74
  • Barbet-Massin M, Jiguet F, Albert CH, Thuiller W (2012) Selecting pseudo-absences for species distribution models: how, where and how many? Methods in Ecology and Evolution 3(2): 327–338. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2011.00172.x
  • Barve N, Barve V, Jiménez-Valverde A, Lira-Noriega A, Maher SP, Peterson AT, Soberón J, Villalobos F (2011) The crucial role of the accessible area in ecological niche modeling and species distribution modeling. Ecological Modelling 222(11): 1810–1819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.02.011
  • Beaumont LJ, Hughes L, Pitman AJ (2008) Why is the choice of future climate scenarios for species distribution modelling important? Ecology Letters 11(11): 1135–1146. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01231.x
  • Bellard C, Bertelsmeier C, Leadley P, Thuiller W, Courchamp F (2012) Impacts of climate change on the future of biodiversity. Ecology Letters 15(4): 365–377. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01736.x
  • Breiner FT, Guisan A, Bergamini A, Nobis MP (2015) Overcoming limitations of modelling rare species by using ensembles of small models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 6(10): 1210–1218. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12403
  • Breiner FT, Nobis MP, Bergamini A, Guisan A (2018) Optimizing ensembles of small models for predicting the distribution of species with few occurrences. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 9(4): 802–808. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12957
  • Cardoso P, Erwin TL, Borges PAV, New TR (2011) The seven impediments in invertebrate conservation and how to overcome them. Biological Conservation 144(11): 2647–2655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2011.07.024
  • Chen Z, Auler AS, Bakalowicz M, Drew D, Griger F, Hartmann J, Jiang G, Moosdorf N, Richts A, Stevanovic Z, Veni G, Goldscheider N (2017) The world karst aquifer mapping project: concept, mapping procedure and map of Europe. Hydrogeology Journal 25(3): 771–785. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-016-1519-3
  • China Nature Reserve Specimen Resource Sharing Platform (2024) List and vector boundaries of nature reserves in China Data set. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14875797 [accessed on 12 February 2026]
  • Christman MC, Culver DC, Madden MK, White D (2005) Patterns of endemism of the eastern North American cave fauna. Journal of Biogeography 32(8): 1441–1452. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2005.01263.x
  • Culver DC, Pipan T (2019) The Biology of caves and other subterranean habitats (2nd edn.). Oxford University Press, Oxford, [xx +] 301 pp. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198820765.001.0001
  • Deharveng L, Bedos A (2012) Diversity patterns in the tropics. In: White WB, Culver DC (Eds) Encyclopedia of Caves (2nd edn.). Academic Press, New York/London, 238–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-383832-2.00032-3
  • Di Cola V, Broennimann O, Petitpierre B, Breiner FT, D'Amen M, Randin C, Engler R, Pottier J, Pio D, Dubuis A, Pellissier L, Mateo RG, Hordijk W, Salamin N, Guisan A (2017) ecospat: an R package to support spatial analyses and modeling of species niches and distributions. Ecography 40(6): 774–787. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.02671
  • Didan K (2021) MODIS/Terra Vegetation Indices 16-Day L3 Global 1km SIN Grid V061. NASA Land Processes Distributed Active Archive Center. https://doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MOD13A2.061 [accessed on 5 February 2026]
  • Dobrowski SZ (2011) A climatic basis for microrefugia: the influence of terrain on climate. Global Change Biology 17(2): 1022–1035. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02263.x
  • Dormann CF, Elith J, Bacher S, Buchmann C, Carl G, Carré G, Marquéz JRG, Gruber B, Lafourcade B, Leitão PJ, Münkemüller T, McClean C, Osborne PE, Reineking B, Schröder B, Skidmore AK, Zurell D, Lautenbach S (2013) Collinearity: a review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography 36(1): 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07348.x
  • Elith J, Graham C, Valavi R, Abegg M, Bruce C, Ford A, Guisan A, Hijmans RJ, Huettmann F, Lohmann L, Loiselle B, Moritz C, Overton J, Peterson AT, Phillips S, Richardson K, Williams S, Wiser SK, Wohlgemuth T, Zimmermann NE (2020) Presence-only and presence-absence data for comparing species distribution modeling methods. Biodiversity Informatics 15(2): 69–80. https://doi.org/10.17161/bi.v15i2.13384
  • Elith J, Leathwick JR (2009) Species distribution models: ecological explanation and prediction across space and time. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 40: 677–697. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.110308.120159
  • Elith J, Kearney M, Phillips S (2010) The art of modelling range-shifting species. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 1(4): 330–342. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2010.00036.x
  • Erickson KD, Smith AB (2023) Modeling the rarest of the rare: a comparison between multi- species distribution models, ensembles of small models, and single-species models at extremely low sample sizes. Ecography 2023(6): e06500. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.06500
  • Eyring V, Bony S, Meehl GA, Senior CA, Stevens B, Stouffer RJ, Taylor KE (2016) Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6): experimental design and organization. Geoscientific Model Development 9(5): 1937–1958. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016
  • Ficetola GF, Canedoli C, Stoch F (2019) The Racovitzan impediment and the hidden biodiversity of unexplored environments. Conservation Biology 33(1): 214–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13179
  • Fick SE, Hijmans RJ (2017) WorldClim 2: new 1-km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology 37(12): 4302–4315. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5086
  • Fielding AH, Bell JF (1997) A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environmental Conservation 24(1): 38–49. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892997000088
  • Fois M, Cuena-Lombraña A, Fenu G, Bacchetta G (2018) Using species distribution models at local scale to guide the search of poorly known species: review, methodological issues and future directions. Ecological Modelling 385: 124–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2018.07.018
  • Fourcade Y, Besnard AG, Secondi J (2018) Paintings predict the distribution of species, or the challenge of selecting environmental predictors and evaluation statistics. Global Ecology and Biogeography 27(2): 245–256. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12684
  • Franklin J (2010a) Mapping species distributions: spatial inference and prediction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, [xviii +] 320 pp. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511810602
  • Franklin J (2010b) Moving beyond static species distribution models in support of conservation biogeography. Diversity and Distributions 16(3): 321–330. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00641.x
  • Franklin J (2013) Species distribution models in conservation biogeography: developments and challenges. Diversity and Distributions 19(10): 1217–1223. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12125
  • Graham CH, Elith J, Hijmans RJ, Guisan A, Peterson AT, Loiselle BA, The Nceas Predicting Species Distributions Working Group (2008) The influence of spatial errors in species occurrence data used in distribution models. Journal of Applied Ecology 45(1): 239–247. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01408.x
  • Guéguen M, Blancheteau H, Lemaire-Patin R, Thuiller W (2026) biomod2: Ensemble platform for species distribution modeling. R package version 4.3-4-5. https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.biomod2
  • Guillera‐Arroita G, Lahoz‐Monfort JJ, Elith J, Gordon A, Kujala H, Lentini PE, McCarthy MA, Tingley R, Wintle BA (2015) Is my species distribution model fit for purpose? Matching data and models to applications. Global Ecology and Biogeography 24(3): 276–292. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12268
  • Guisan A, Thuiller W (2005) Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. Ecology Letters 8(9): 993–1009. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00792.x
  • Guisan A, Tingley R, Baumgartner JB, Naujokaitis‐Lewis I, Sutcliffe PR, Tulloch AIT, Regan TJ, Brotons L, McDonald‐Madden E, Mantyka‐Pringle C, Martin TG, Rhodes JR, Maggini R, Setterfield SA, Elith J, Schwartz MW, Wintle BA, Broennimann O, Austin M, Ferrier S, Kearney MR, Possingham HP, Buckley YM (2013) Predicting species distributions for conservation decisions. Ecology Letters 16(12): 1424–1435. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12189
  • Hao T, Elith J, Guillera-Arroita G, Lahoz-Monfort JJ (2019) A review of evidence about use and performance of species distribution modelling ensembles like BIOMOD. Diversity and Distributions 25(5): 839–852. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12892
  • Hernandez PA, Graham CH, Master LL, Albert DL (2006) The effect of sample size and species characteristics on performance of different species distribution modeling methods. Ecography 29(5): 773–785. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0906-7590.2006.04700.x
  • Hijmans RJ, Brown A, Bivand MBR, Chirico M, Cordano E, Dyba K, Pebesma E, Rowlingson B, Sumner MD (2026) terra: spatial data analysis. R package version 1.8-93. https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.terra
  • Hirzel AH, Le Lay G, Helfer V, Randin C, Guisan A (2006) Evaluating the ability of habitat suitability models to predict species presences. Ecological Modelling 199(2): 142–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.05.017
  • Hortal J, de Bello F, Diniz-Filho JAF, Lewinsohn TM, Lobo JM, Ladle RJ (2015) Seven shortfalls that beset large-scale knowledge of biodiversity. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 46: 523–549. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-112414-054400
  • Jarnevich CS, Stohlgren TJ, Kumar S, Morisette JT, Holcombe TR (2015) Caveats for correlative species distribution modeling. Ecological Informatics 29(1): 6–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2015.06.007
  • Jiang Z, Lian Y, Qin X (2014) Rocky desertification in Southwest China: impacts, causes, and restoration. Earth-Science Reviews 132: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2014.01.005
  • Jiménez-Valverde A, Lobo JM, Hortal J (2008) Not as good as they seem: the importance of concepts in species distribution modelling. Diversity and Distributions 14(6): 885–890. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2008.00496.x
  • Juberthie C, Decu V (1994) Encyclopaedia Biospeologica (Vol. I). Société de Biospéologie, Moulis, [iii–xii +] 1–834 pp.
  • Kass JM, Muscarella R, Galante PJ, Bohl CL, Pinilla‐Buitrago GE, Boria RA, Soley‐Guardia M, Anderson RP (2021) ENMeval 2.0: Redesigned for customizable and reproducible modeling of species' niches and distributions. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 12(9): 1602–1608. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13628
  • Keppel G, Van Niel KP, Wardell‐Johnson GW, Yates CJ, Byrne M, Mucina L, Schut AGT, Hopper SD, Franklin SE (2012) Refugia: identifying and understanding safe havens for biodiversity under climate change. Global Ecology and Biogeography 21(4): 393–404. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2011.00686.x
  • Lee-Yaw JA, McCune JL, Pironon S, Sheth SN (2022) Species distribution models rarely predict the biology of real populations. Ecography 2022(6): e05877. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.05877
  • Leroy B (2023) Choosing presence-only species distribution models. Journal of Biogeography 50(1): 247–250. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.14505
  • Liu C, White M, Newell G (2013) Selecting thresholds for the prediction of species occurrence with presence-only data. Journal of Biogeography 40(4): 778–789. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.12058
  • Lobo JM, Jiménez-Valverde A, Real R (2008) AUC: a misleading measure of the performance of predictive distribution models. Global Ecology and Biogeography 17(2): 145–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2007.00358.x
  • Lomba A, Pellissier L, Randin C, Vicente J, Moreira F, Honrado J, Guisan A (2010) Overcoming the rare species modelling paradox: A novel hierarchical framework applied to an Iberian endemic plant. Biological Conservation 143(11): 2647–2657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2010.07.007
  • Lumaret J-P, Lobo JM (1996) Geographic distribution of endemic dung beetles (Coleoptera, Scarabaeoidea) in the western Palaearctic Region. Biodiversity Letters 3(6): 192–199. https://doi.org/10.2307/2999676
  • Maitner BS, Richards RL, Carlson BS, Drake JM, Merow C (2026) Flexible methods for species distribution modeling with small samples. Ecography 2026(2): e08112. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecog.08112
  • Mammola S, Goodacre SL, Isaia M (2018) Climate change may drive cave spiders to extinction. Ecography 41(1): 233–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.02902
  • Mammola S, Leroy B (2018) Applying species distribution models to caves and other subterranean habitats. Ecography 41(7): 1194–1208. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.03464
  • Mammola S, Cardoso P, Culver DC, Deharveng L, Ferreira RL, Fišer C, Galassi DMP, Griebler C, Halse S, Humphreys WF, Isaia M, Malard F, Martinez A, Moldovan OT, Niemiller ML, Pavlek M, Reboleira ASPS, Souza-Silva M, Teeling EC, Wynne JJ, Zagmajster M (2019) Scientists' warning on the conservation of subterranean ecosystems. BioScience 69(8): 641–650. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biz064
  • Mammola S, Amorim IR, Bichuette ME, Borges PAV, Cheeptham N, Cooper SJB, Culver DC, Deharveng L, Eme D, Ferreira RL, Fišer C, Fišer Ž, Fong DW, Griebler C, Jeffery WR, Jugovic J, Kowalko JE, Lilley TM, Malard F, Manenti R, Martínez A, Meierhofer MB, Niemiller ML, Northup DE, Pellegrini TG, Pipan T, Protas M, Reboleira ASPS, Venarsky MP, Wynne JJ, Zagmajster M, Cardoso P (2020) Fundamental research questions in subterranean biology. Biological Reviews 95(6): 1855–1872. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12642
  • Mammola S, Altermatt F, Alther R, Amorim IR, Băncilă RI, Borges PAV, Brad T, Brankovits D, Cardoso P, Cerasoli F, Chauveau CA, Delić T, Di Lorenzo T, Faille A, Fišer C, Flot J-F, Gabriel R, Galassi DMP, Garzoli L, Griebler C, Konecny-Dupré L, Martínez A, Mori N, Nanni V, Ogorelec Ž, Pallarés S, Salussolia A, Saccò M, Stoch F, Vaccarelli I, Zagmajster M, Zittra C, Meierhofer MB, Sánchez-Fernández D, Malard F (2024) Perspectives and pitfalls in preserving subterranean biodiversity through protected areas. npj Biodiversity 3: 2. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44185-023-00035-1
  • Mammola S, Meierhofer MB, Borges PA, Colado R, Culver DC, Deharveng L, Delić T, Di Lorenzo T, Dražina T, Ferreira RL, Fiasca B, Fišer C, Galassi DMP, Garzoli L, Gerovasileiou V, Griebler C, Halse S, Howarth FG, Isaia M, Johnson JS, Komerički A, Martínez A, Milano F, Moldovan OT, Nanni V, Nicolosi G, Niemiller ML, Pallarés S, Pavlek M, Piano E, Pipan T, Sanchez‐Fernandez D, Santangeli A, Schmidt SI, Wynne JJ, Zagmajster M, Zakšek V, Cardoso P (2022) Towards evidence-based conservation of subterranean ecosystems. Biological Reviews 97(4): 1476–1510. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12851
  • McPherson JM, Jetz W (2007) Effects of species' ecology on the accuracy of distribution models. Ecography 30(1): 135–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0906-7590.2007.04823.x
  • Mendes P, Velazco SJE, de Andrade AFA, Júnior PDM (2020) Dealing with overprediction in species distribution models: How adding distance constraints can improve model accuracy. Ecological Modelling 431: 109180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109180
  • Merow C, Smith MJ, Silander Jr JA (2013) A practical guide to MaxEnt for modeling species' distributions: what it does, and why inputs and settings matter. Ecography 36(10): 1058–1069. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.07872.x
  • Merow C, Smith MJ, Edwards TC, Guisan A, McMahon SM, Normand S, Thuiller W, Wüest RO, Zimmermann NE, Elith J (2014) What do we gain from simplicity versus complexity in species distribution models? Ecography 37(12): 1267–1281. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.00845
  • Morales NS, Fernández IC, Baca-González V (2017) MaxEnt's parameter configuration and small samples: are we paying attention to recommendations? A systematic review. PeerJ 5: e3093. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3093
  • Morelli TL, Barrows CW, Ramirez AR, Cartwright JM, Ackerly DD, Eaves TD, Ebersole JL, Krawchuk MA, Letcher BH, Mahalovich MF, Meigs GW, Michalak JL, Millar CI, Quiñones RM, Stralberg D, Thorne JH (2020) Climate-change refugia: biodiversity in the slow lane. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 18(5): 228–234. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2189
  • Moreno-Amat E, Mateo RG, Nieto-Lugilde D, Morueta-Holme N, Svenning J-C, García-Amorena I (2015) Impact of model complexity on cross-temporal transferability in Maxent species distribution models: An assessment using paleobotanical data. Ecological Modelling 312: 308–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.05.035
  • Moudrý V, Bazzichetto M, Remelgado R, Devillers R, Lenoir J, Mateo RG, Lembrechts JJ, Sillero N, Lecours V, Cord AF, Barták V, Balej P, Rocchini D, Torresani M, Arenas‐Castro S, Man M, Prajzlerová D, Gdulová K, Prošek J, Marchetto E, Zarzo‐Arias A, Gábor L, Leroy F, Martini M, Malavasi M, Cazzolla Gatti R, Wild J, Šímová P (2024) Optimising occurrence data in species distribution models: sample size, positional uncertainty, and sampling bias matter. Ecography 2024(12): e07294. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.07294
  • Nelder JA, Wedderburn RWM (1972) Generalized linear models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 135(3): 370–384. https://doi.org/10.2307/2344614
  • O'Neill BC, Kriegler E, Ebi KL, Kemp-Benedict E, Riahi K, Rothman DS, van Ruijven BJ, van Vuuren DP, Birkmann J, Kok K, Levy M, Solecki W (2017) The roads ahead: narratives for shared socioeconomic pathways describing world futures in the 21st century. Global Environmental Change 42: 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.01.004
  • Pearson RG, Raxworthy CJ, Nakamura M, Peterson AT (2007) Predicting species distributions from small numbers of occurrence records: a test case using cryptic geckos in Madagascar. Journal of Biogeography 34(1): 102–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01594.x
  • Pebesma E (2018) Simple features for R: standardized support for spatial vector data. The R Journal 10: 439–446. https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2018-009
  • Pebesma E, Bivand R (2023) Spatial data science: with applications in R. Chapman and Hall/CRC, New York, 314 pp. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429459016
  • Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE (2006) Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecological Modelling 190(3–4): 231–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026
  • Phillips SJ, Dudík M, Elith J, Graham CH, Lehmann A, Leathwick J, Ferrier S (2009) Sample selection bias and presence-only distribution models: implications for background and pseudo-absence data. Ecological Applications 19(1): 181–197. https://doi.org/10.1890/07-2153.1
  • Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Dudík M, Schapire RE, Blair ME (2017) Opening the black box: an open-source release of Maxent. Ecography 40(7): 887–893. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.03049
  • Qiao H, Soberón J, Peterson AT (2015) No silver bullets in correlative ecological niche modelling: insights from testing among many potential algorithms for niche estimation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 6(10): 1126–1136. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12397
  • Qiao H, Peterson AT, Ji L, Hu J (2017) Using data from related species to overcome spatial sampling bias and associated limitations in ecological niche modelling. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 8(12): 1804–1812. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12832
  • R Core Team (2025) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.r-project.org [accessed on 4 February 2026]
  • Raes N, ter Steege H (2007) A null-model for significance testing of presence-only species distribution models. Ecography 30(5): 727–736. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2007.0906-7590.05041.x
  • Riahi K, van Vuuren DP, Kriegler E, Edmonds J, O'Neill BC, Fujimori S, Bauer N, Calvin K, Dellink R, Fricko O, Lutz W, Popp A, Cuaresma JC, KC S, Leimbach M, Jiang L, Kram T, Rao S, Emmerling J, Ebi K, Hasegawa T, Havlik P, Humpenöder F, Da Silva LA, Smith S, Stehfest E, Bosetti V, Eom J, Gernaat D, Masui T, Rogelj J, Strefler J, Drouet L, Krey V, Luderer G, Harmsen M, Takahashi K, Baumstark L, Doelman JC, Kainuma M, Klimont Z, Marangoni G, Lotze-Campen H, Obersteiner M, Tabeau A, Tavoni M (2017) The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: an overview. Global Environmental Change 42: 153–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009
  • Sánchez-Fernández D, Galassi DMP, Wynne JJ, Cardoso P, Mammola S (2021) Don't forget subterranean ecosystems in climate change agendas. Nature Climate Change 11: 458–459. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01057-y
  • Sillero N, Arenas-Castro S, Enriquez‐Urzelai U, Vale CG, Sousa-Guedes D, Martínez-Freiría F, Real R, Barbosa A (2021) Want to model a species niche? A step-by-step guideline on correlative ecological niche modelling. Ecological Modelling 456: 109671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2021.109671
  • Simon KS, Benfield EF, Macko SA (2003) Food web structure and the role of epilithic biofilms in cave streams. Ecology 84(9): 2395–2406. https://doi.org/10.1890/02-334
  • Sinclair SJ, White MD, Newell GR (2010) How useful are species distribution models for managing biodiversity under future climates? Ecology and Society 15(1): 8. https://doi.org/10.5751/es-03089-150108
  • Smith AB, Godsoe W, Rodríguez-Sánchez F, Wang H-H, Warren D (2019) Niche estimation above and below the species level. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 34(3): 260–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2018.10.012
  • Soley-Guardia M, Alvarado-Serrano DF, Anderson RP (2024) Top ten hazards to avoid when modeling species distributions: a didactic guide of assumptions, problems, and recommendations. Ecography 2024(4): e06852. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.06852
  • Sousa-Silva R, Alves P, Honrado J, Lomba A (2014) Improving the assessment and reporting on rare and endangered species through species distribution models. Global Ecology and Conservation 2: 226–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2014.09.011
  • Stanton JC, Pearson RG, Horning N, Ersts P, Akçakaya HR (2012) Combining static and dynamic variables in species distribution models under climate change. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 3(2): 349–357. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2011.00157.x
  • Swets JA (1988) Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 240(4857): 1285–1293. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3287615
  • Tatebe H, Ogura T, Nitta T, Komuro Y, Ogochi K, Takemura T, Watanabe S, Kimoto M, Kawai H, Koshiro T, Oshima N, Yoshida K, Urakawa S, Tsujino H, Deushi M, Mishima M, Nosaka M, Saito R, Sasaki H, Koshiro T, Okajima H, Saito H, Suzuki T, Chikamoto Y, Ogura F, Aihara K (2019) Description and basic evaluation of simulated mean state, internal variability, and climate sensitivity in MIROC6. Geoscientific Model Development 12(7): 2727–2765. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2727-2019
  • Thomas CD, Cameron A, Green RE, Bakkenes M, Beaumont LJ, Collingham YC, Erasmus BFN, de Siqueira MF, Grainger A, Hannah L, Hughes L, Huntley B, van Jaarsveld AS, Midgley GF, Miles L, Ortega-Huerta MA, Townsend Peterson A, Phillips OL, Williams SE (2004) Extinction risk from climate change. Nature 427: 145–148. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02121
  • Thuiller W (2004) Patterns and uncertainties of species' range shifts under climate change. Global Change Biology 10(12): 2020–2027. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2004.00859.x
  • Thuiller W, Lafourcade B, Engler R, Araújo MB (2009) BIOMOD – a platform for ensemble forecasting of species distributions. Ecography 32(3): 369–373. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2008.05742.x
  • Tian M-Y, Liu W-X, Huang S-B, Luo X-Z (2023) Cave biology. Geology Press, Beijing, [viii +] 248 pp. [in Chinese]
  • Tian M-Y, Wei G-F, Huang S-B, Liu W-X, Chen JJ, Li X, Wang C, Zheng Z, Shi K, Li A (2017) Life in dark world: cavernicolous creatures in Huanjiang World Natural Heritage site of South China Karst. Guangxi Science & Technology Publishing House, Nanning, [viii +] 134 pp. [in Chinese and English]
  • Tredennick AT, Hooker G, Ellner SP, Adler PB (2021) A practical guide to selecting models for exploration, inference, and prediction in ecology. Ecology 102(6): e03336. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.3336
  • Vaccarelli I, Colado R, Pallarés S, Galassi DMP, Sánchez-Fernández D, Di Cicco M, Meierhofer MB, Piano E, Di Lorenzo T, Mammola S (2023) A global meta-analysis reveals multilevel and context-dependent effects of climate change on subterranean ecosystems. One Earth 6(11): 1510–1522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2023.09.001
  • van Proosdij ASJ, Sosef MSS, Wieringa JJ, Raes N (2016) Minimum required number of specimen records to develop accurate species distribution models. Ecography 39(6): 542–552. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.01509
  • Velazco SJE, Rose MB, Marco PD, Regan HM, Franklin J (2024) How far can I extrapolate my species distribution model? Exploring shape, a novel method. Ecography 2024(3): e06992. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.06992
  • Warren DL, Seifert SN (2011) Ecological niche modeling in Maxent: the importance of model complexity and the performance of model selection criteria. Ecological Applications 21(2): 335–342. https://doi.org/10.1890/10-1171.1
  • Wisz MS, Guisan A (2009) Do pseudo-absence selection strategies influence species distribution models and their predictions? An information-theoretic approach based on simulated data. BMC Ecology 9(1): 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6785-9-8
  • Wu T, Lu Y, Fang Y, Xin X, Li L, Li W, Jie W, Zhang J, Liu Y, Zhang L, Zhang F, Zhang Y, Wu F, Li J, Chu M, Wang Z, Shi X, Liu X, Wei M, Huang A, Zhang Y, Liu X (2019) The Beijing Climate Center Climate System Model (BCC-CSM): the main progress from CMIP5 to CMIP6. Geoscientific Model Development 12(4): 1573–1600. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1573-2019
  • Yin Z-W (2020) New species of karst-dwelling Pselaphinae from southwestern China (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae). Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae 60(1): 163–168. https://doi.org/10.37520/aemnp.2020.009
  • Yin Z-W (2025) Illuminating the darkness: an exceptionally diverse fauna of subterranean Pselaphinae (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae) in Asian karsts. Insect Systematics and Diversity 9(5): ixaf046. https://doi.org/10.1093/isd/ixaf046
  • Yin Z-W, He L (2020) New cavernicolous Pselaphinae from Sichuan, China (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae). The Coleopterists Bulletin 74(4): 827–836. https://doi.org/10.1649/0010-065x-74.4.827 065X-74.4.827
  • Yin Z-W, Li L-Z (2015) Zopherobatrus gen. n. (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Pselaphinae), a new troglobitic batrisine from southwestern China. Zootaxa 3985(2): 291–295. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3985.2.8
  • Yukimoto S, Kawai H, Koshiro T, Oshima N, Yoshida K, Urakawa S, Tsujino H, Deushi M, Tanaka T, Hosaka M, Yabu S, Yoshimura H, Shindo E, Mizuta R, Obata A, Adachi Y, Ishii M (2019) The meteorological research institute earth system model version 2.0, MRI-ESM2.0: description and basic evaluation of the physical component. Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan 97(5): 931–965. https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.2019-051
  • Zurell D, Franklin J, König C, Bouchet PJ, Dormann CF, Elith J, Fandos G, Feng X, Guillera‐Arroita G, Guisan A, Lahoz‐Monfort JJ, Leitão PJ, Park DS, Peterson AT, Rapacciuolo G, Schmatz DR, Schröder B, Serra‐Diaz JM, Thuiller W, Yates KL, Zimmermann NE, Merow C (2020) A standard protocol for reporting species distribution models. Ecography 43(9): 1261–1277. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.04960