Entanglement as Interaction: Resolving Einstein's Concern Through the Cohesion UFT Operator Framework

Einstein’s primary objection to quantum mechanics was the paradox he called “spooky
action at a distance” [1]: the apparent instantaneous influence of a measurement on one particle
upon the state of its entangled partner, regardless of their separation. Bell’s theorem [2] and
subsequent photon polarisation experiments [3] confirmed that entanglement is real and that
no local hidden variable theory can reproduce its correlations. The conceptual gap persists:
how can quantum coherence be maintained without signalling?
This paper proposes a resolution grounded in the Cohesion unified field theory [5].
Entanglement is reframed not as mysterious instantaneous transmission but as a shared
evolutionary rhythm maintained by the Cohesion UFT’s operator system. Entangled particles
do not send signals; they share a common structural cadence established at the moment
of their joint genesis and sustained by the Continuance operator until a new interaction
introduces a new cadence.
Version 2 adds the geometric picture of that shared cadence: two entangled particles
share a common funneled-spring structure established at creation. Their torsion cycles are
phase-locked by the Continuance operator. Measurement — Collapse — is the moment
one spring’s slip event resolves the joint state. This geometry connects the entanglement
framework directly to the fine-structure constant series [11], in which the same funneled-spring
torsion mechanism determines the gap between the golden angle and 1/α.
The Cohesion UFT’s four-operator framework for entanglement — Surplus, Collapse,
Continuance, and Calibration — is developed formally. Bell inequality violations are consistent
with the rhythm picture. Fuentes’ results on relativistic quantum information [4] directly
support the Continuance operator’s prediction.