Relational Grounding and the Quantum Measurement Problem: Admissibility Conditions for Definite Outcomes
Description
Relational Grounding and the Quantum Measurement Problem develops a constraint on outcome attribution within quantum mechanics. The paper distinguishes formal state assignment from located outcomes and introduces an admissibility condition: evaluation over candidate outcomes must range over actual members of reality rather than representations. From this, a Quantum Grounding Constraint is derived, showing that definite outcomes can only be attributed where relational grounding is established. The result does not solve the measurement problem but restricts its admissible form by excluding ungrounded outcome attribution. The framework applies this constraint across standard interpretations, clarifying the conditions under which definite outcomes can be meaningfully attributed.
Files
paper_quantum_grounding_v1.0.pdf
Additional details
Related works
- Is derived from
- Preprint: 10.5281/zenodo.19511768 (DOI)
- Preprint: 10.5281/zenodo.19540643 (DOI)
References
- Brukner, 350. Č. (2018). A no-go theorem for observer-independent facts. Entropy, 20(5), 350.
- Frauchiger, D., & Renner, R. (2018). Quantum theory cannot consistently describe the use of itself. Nature Communications, 9, 3711.
- Fuchs, C. A., & Peres, A. (2000). Quantum theory needs no interpretation. Physics Today, 53(3), 70–71.
- Lattyak, N. D. (2026). A formal framework for evaluation and relational grounding. Zenodo. Version 1.0, 11 April 2026. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19511768.
- Rovelli, C. (1996). Relational quantum mechanics. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 35(8), 1637–1678.
- Zurek, W. H. (2003). Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical. Reviews of Modern Physics, 75(3), 715–775.