Argot Collection of Modular Forms to Fermat Equation

Modular elliptic curves and Fermat's Last Theorem claims to have provided a proof of Fermat's Last Theorem, but in reality, it has no genuine causal connection to the theorem. The entire text relies heavily on the mutual referencing of numerous arbitrarily coined terms; the seemingly abstract logic of this terminology-driven narrative lacks any concrete mathematical operability. Key terms such as the discriminant of curves actually seriously violate common mathematical sense. This article, using a tabular format, analyzes in detail the various logically unnecessary, sensationalist terms, abstract concepts, and connecting phrases in the lengthy narrative of modular elliptic curves, and points out that it always avoids necessary mathematical calculations and logical reasoning, and cannot be argued or verified using concrete mathematical expressions. The original text extensively uses existence assertions rather than mathematical proofs, including citations of viewpoints from other authors rather than logical reasoning, while skipping virtually all necessary and critical proof steps using phrases such as ``it can be proved'' and ``it is well known''. By promoting the modular form narrative, Annals of Mathematics is apparently motivated not by the pursuit of truth, but by the distribution of vested interests, and has actually led the academic community astray from the essence of mathematics. This is precisely the fundamental reason for the stagnation of modern mathematics and physics.