The Shibboleth Lattice: Recognition Channels and the Universality of In-Group Coordination
Description
A working paper unifying four documented cases of multi-agent coalition behavior (quantum-game entanglement, evolutionary covert-tag recognition, engineered handshake collusion, and emergent peer-preservation in frontier language models) under a single formal structure: the binding operator B = (S, I, W, ρ, χ). The central technical contribution is the recognition channel proxy κ_H, defined as a principal-relative uncertainty coefficient (Theil 1970) on the channel through which inside-set agents identify each other. κ_H is a behavioral proxy estimated from resistance rates, not a directly measured Shannon channel capacity; the paper is explicit about what that distinction implies.
The paper estimates κ_H ≈ 0.94 for the Potter et al. (2026) peer-preservation result under explicit modeling assumptions. The sigmoidal pattern of coalition formation across κ_H is treated as phenomenological: it describes the available evidence across all four cases but is not derived from first principles. The paper derives one falsifiable prediction (witness-set substitution under a blinded audit should collapse coalition behavior at saturating κ_H) directly from the formalism and contrasts it with the instrumental convergence reading, which predicts no reduction under a blinded audit.
v3 changes
κ_H renamed "proxy" throughout; explicitly not a Shannon channel capacity, only a behavioral estimate from resistance rates.Sigmoid relabeled phenomenological, not derived from first principles. Quantum/classical distinction added: ontological vs. epistemological non-factorizability, unification is principal-relative only. Witness-set prediction strengthened: blinded audit required; instrumental convergence now predicts no reduction under blind, sharpening discrimination. Interactive companion simulator demonstrating the lattice dynamics, substrate presets, and audit-toggle falsification test added.
Series information (English)
Companion empirical work in preparation. References to Potter et al. (2026) treat that result as a working-paper anchor pending independent replication.
Technical info (English)
AI Use Statement.
This working paper was developed in extended dialogue with Anthropic's Claude (Opus 4.6), Grok 3.1 and Kimi 2.5 Thinking using a proprietary commercial NovaKit Utilities v3 'Cognition-as-Utility' toolkit. The author originated the thesis, supplied source materials (including Bilar 2016 and the Potter et al. 2026 working paper), and made all editorial decisions. Claude assisted with formalization (the binding-operator tuple and the principal-relative non-factorizability condition in §2), the $κ_H$ computation in §3, structural revision across multiple drafts. A series of GAN-like adversarial critical reviews, and reference verifications were performed using aforementioned models. All claims, the framework's predictions, and any errors are the author's.
Other
Visualization
An interactive companion simulator demonstrating the lattice dynamics, substrate presets, and audit-toggle falsification test is available at https://gemini.google.com/share/6d2f2b5872f8
Files
dyb-2026i-shibboleth-short.pdf
Files
(222.8 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:a44595f6c269363dbec026744628d98a
|
222.8 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Related works
- Is described by
- Drawing: https://gemini.google.com/share/6d2f2b5872f8 (URL)
- Is new version of
- Working paper: 10.5281/zenodo.19595988 (DOI)
- Is supplemented by
- Preprint: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2454v2 (DOI)
Dates
- Available
-
2026-04-15