Published May 2, 2026 | Version v778
Publication Open

V155_1 — A Projected Wavelet Prime‑Pair Criterion Equivalent to the Riemann Hypothesis

Authors/Creators

Description

Description: This paper develops a projected high‑pass wavelet criterion for the Riemann Hypothesis (RH). It reformulates the explicit formula for primes into a prime‑pair covariance problem, using compactly supported mean‑zero wavelets on the logarithmic scale. By construction, the continuous background term is annihilated, leaving only atomic prime sums.

🔹 Wavelet Projection and Background Cancellation

  • Compactly supported wavelets are projected so that the continuous background term vanishes exactly.

  • This ensures the prime‑side energy is purely atomic, with diagonal contributions uniformly bounded.

  • The remaining obstruction is the off‑diagonal prime‑pair covariance.

🔹 Prime Atomic Energy

  • The projected energy expands into two parts:

    1. Diagonal term — bounded uniformly.

    2. Off‑diagonal term — a signed covariance of prime pairs, which is the essential obstruction.

🔹 Equivalence Criterion

  • For every admissible detector bundle, RH ⇔ uniform boundedness of the Abel‑regularized projected prime‑pair energy.

  • Off‑critical zeros force blow‑up in the energy (pole detection).

  • Assuming RH, projected kernel estimates and decay properties yield boundedness.

🔹 Arithmetic Obstruction

  • The continuous background, polar term, and diagonal atom energy are removed by construction.

  • The unresolved problem is a second‑order prime‑pair covariance estimate for the von Mangoldt function under a sign‑changing logarithmic wavelet kernel.

  • This reduces RH to proving uniform cancellation in these projected prime‑pair sums.

🔹 Relation to Existing Methods

  • Hardy–Littlewood heuristics: projection annihilates the continuous pair main term, leaving fluctuations.

  • Vaughan and Heath‑Brown identities: Type I terms are killed by projection; the difficulty lies in Type II bilinear forms.

  • Goldston–Montgomery variance, pretentious methods, and spectral large sieve: related in philosophy but not sufficient to reach the endpoint bound.

🔹 Conclusion V155_1 isolates RH as a precise second‑order arithmetic cancellation problem: proving a uniform projected Type II prime‑pair covariance bound. The criterion provides a sharp equivalence, removing irrelevant structures and leaving only the true obstruction.

Files

RH_V155_1.pdf

Files (360.8 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:028973b36d8645aeebfe41e7f4777ed1
26.3 kB Download
md5:ce3e59efcf6543e1d878adb06dfcef30
334.5 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Dates

Issued
2026-03-07

References

  • Titchmarsh, E. C. (1986). The Theory of the Riemann Zeta-function (2nd ed., revised by D. R. Heath-Brown). Oxford University Press. Edwards, H. M. (1974). Riemann's Zeta Function. Dover Publications. Báez-Duarte, L. (2003). A strengthening of the Nyman–Beurling criterion for the Riemann hypothesis. Rendiconti del Circolo Matematico di Palermo, 52(3), 375–380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12215-003-0007-1 Conrey, J. B. (2003). The Riemann Hypothesis. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 50(3), 341–353. Ivić, A. (1985). The Riemann Zeta-Function: Theory and Applications. Dover Publications.