V155_1 — A Projected Wavelet Prime‑Pair Criterion Equivalent to the Riemann Hypothesis
Authors/Creators
Description
Description: This paper develops a projected high‑pass wavelet criterion for the Riemann Hypothesis (RH). It reformulates the explicit formula for primes into a prime‑pair covariance problem, using compactly supported mean‑zero wavelets on the logarithmic scale. By construction, the continuous background term is annihilated, leaving only atomic prime sums.
🔹 Wavelet Projection and Background Cancellation
-
Compactly supported wavelets are projected so that the continuous background term vanishes exactly.
-
This ensures the prime‑side energy is purely atomic, with diagonal contributions uniformly bounded.
-
The remaining obstruction is the off‑diagonal prime‑pair covariance.
🔹 Prime Atomic Energy
-
The projected energy expands into two parts:
-
Diagonal term — bounded uniformly.
-
Off‑diagonal term — a signed covariance of prime pairs, which is the essential obstruction.
-
🔹 Equivalence Criterion
-
For every admissible detector bundle, RH ⇔ uniform boundedness of the Abel‑regularized projected prime‑pair energy.
-
Off‑critical zeros force blow‑up in the energy (pole detection).
-
Assuming RH, projected kernel estimates and decay properties yield boundedness.
🔹 Arithmetic Obstruction
-
The continuous background, polar term, and diagonal atom energy are removed by construction.
-
The unresolved problem is a second‑order prime‑pair covariance estimate for the von Mangoldt function under a sign‑changing logarithmic wavelet kernel.
-
This reduces RH to proving uniform cancellation in these projected prime‑pair sums.
🔹 Relation to Existing Methods
-
Hardy–Littlewood heuristics: projection annihilates the continuous pair main term, leaving fluctuations.
-
Vaughan and Heath‑Brown identities: Type I terms are killed by projection; the difficulty lies in Type II bilinear forms.
-
Goldston–Montgomery variance, pretentious methods, and spectral large sieve: related in philosophy but not sufficient to reach the endpoint bound.
🔹 Conclusion V155_1 isolates RH as a precise second‑order arithmetic cancellation problem: proving a uniform projected Type II prime‑pair covariance bound. The criterion provides a sharp equivalence, removing irrelevant structures and leaving only the true obstruction.
Files
RH_V155_1.pdf
Files
(360.8 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:028973b36d8645aeebfe41e7f4777ed1
|
26.3 kB | Download |
|
md5:ce3e59efcf6543e1d878adb06dfcef30
|
334.5 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Dates
- Issued
-
2026-03-07
References
- Titchmarsh, E. C. (1986). The Theory of the Riemann Zeta-function (2nd ed., revised by D. R. Heath-Brown). Oxford University Press. Edwards, H. M. (1974). Riemann's Zeta Function. Dover Publications. Báez-Duarte, L. (2003). A strengthening of the Nyman–Beurling criterion for the Riemann hypothesis. Rendiconti del Circolo Matematico di Palermo, 52(3), 375–380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12215-003-0007-1 Conrey, J. B. (2003). The Riemann Hypothesis. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 50(3), 341–353. Ivić, A. (1985). The Riemann Zeta-Function: Theory and Applications. Dover Publications.