Phytoseiidae Berlese 1916
Authors/Creators
- 1. Laboratory of Ecological Information, Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606 - 8502, Japan & Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Assiut University, Assiut 71526, Egypt
- 2. NARO headquarters, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305 - 8517, Japan
- 3. Institute of Plant Protection, NARO, Morioka, Iwate 020 - 0123, Japan
- 4. Laboratory of Ecological Information, Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606 - 8502, Japan & Emeritus Professor, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606 - 8502, Japan & Laboratory of Ecological Information, Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606 - 8502, Japan
Description
Key to subfamilies, tribes and genera of the Phytoseiidae in Japan (females)
1. Setae z3 and s6 absent (with four prolateral setae)............ Amblyseiinae Muma, 1961 ....................... 8
- Either or both setae z3 and s6 present (with more than four prolaterals)........................................ 2
2. Setae Z1, S2, S4, S5 absent............ Phytoseiinae Berlese, 1913 ...................... Phytoseius Ribaga, 1904
- At least one of setae Z1, S2, S4 or S5 present............ Typhlodrominae Scheuten, 1857 ...................... 3
3. Seta s6 absent............ Chanteiini Chant & McMurtry, 1994 ............... Chanteius contiguus (Chant, 1959)
- Seta s6 present.................................................................................... 4
4. Seta z6 present............ Paraseiulini Wainstein, 1976 ................................................. 7
- Seta z6 absent..................................................................................... 5
5. Setae S4 and JV4 present............ Typhlodromini Wainstein, 1962 .............. Typhlodromus Scheuten, 1857
- Setae S4 and JV4 absent............ Metaseiulini Chant & McMurtry, 1994 .................................. 6
6. Seta R1 absent; seta S2 present.................................. Galendromus (G.) occidentalis (Nesbitt, 1951)
- Seta R1 present; seta S2 absent..................................... Typhlodromina conspicua (Garman, 1948)
7. Seta JV2 absent....................................................... Paraseiulus soleiger (Ribaga, 1902)
- Seta JV2 present............................................ Kuzinellus yokogawae (Ehara & Hamaoka, 1980)
8. Peritremal shield not fused anteriorly with dorsal shield............ Indoseiulini Ehara & Amano, 1998 ...................................................................................... Gynaeseius Wainstein, 1962
- Peritremal shield fused anteriorly with dorsal shield....................................................... 9
9. Sternal shield with median posterior projection; pre-anal setae JV2 and ZV2 migrated forward............ Euseiini Chant & McMurtry, 2005a ............................................................................... 20
- Sternal shield without posterior projection; without forward migration of pre-anal setae JV2 and ZV2 .............. 10
10. Seta S4 absent.................................................................................... 14
- Seta S4 present................................................................................... 11
11. Ratio seta s4: Z1> 3:1; setae s4, Z4 and usually Z5 distinctly longer than other dorsal setae; seta J2 present/absent............ Amblyseiini Muma, 1961 ...................................................................... 17
- Ratio seta s4: Z1 <3:1; setae s4, Z4 and usually Z5 not greatly longer than other dorsal setae; seta J2 present......... 12
12. GeII and GeIII rarely with macroseta; fixed digit of chelicera usually with fewer than six teeth..... Neoseiulini Chant & McMurtry, 2003a .............................................................. Neoseiulus Hughes, 1948
- GeII and GeIII usually with macrosetae; fixed digit of chelicera usually with more than six teeth............ Typhlodromipsini Chant & McMurtry, 2005b .......................................................................... 13
13. Dorsal shield with waist at level of seta R1; seta R1 not inserted on dorsal shield; posterior margin of sternal shield straight or concave and never with posterior projection................................... Typhlodromips De Leon, 1965
- Dorsal shield without waist at level of seta R1; seta R1 inserted on edge of the dorsal shield; posterior margin of sternal shield sometimes with a median projection, lightly sclerotised or indistinct Scapulaseius Karg & Oomen-Kalsbeek, 1987
14. Ventrianal shield usually long, narrow, with 3 pairs of pre-anal setae............ Kampimodromini Kolodochka, 1998 ............................................................................................... 15
- Ventrianal shield reduced, neither long nor narrow, with 0-1 pair of pre-anal setae............ Phytoseiulini Chant & McMurtry, 2006 ................................................ Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot, 1957
15. Without distinctive notch or incision in lateral margin of dorsal shield at level of seta s4.......... Okiseius Ehara, 1967
- With distinctive notch or incision in lateral margin of dorsal shield at level of seta s4 ........................... 16
16. Setae S2 present............................................................. Amblyseiulella Muma, 1961
- Setae S2 absent.................................................. Paraphytoseius Swirski & Schechter, 1961
17. Sternal shield narrow; ventrianal shield usually longer than wide; setae z2 and z4 usually short/minute; setae j5, S2 and S4 present, setae J2, S5 and Z1 present/absent............................................................. 19
- Sternal shield broad; ventrianal shield usually broader; legs II–IV with/without macrosetae; setae z2 and/or z4 often longer; setae j5, J2, S2, S4 and/or Z1 present/absent............................................................ 18
18. Seta J2 absent, seta j5 present.................................................. Proprioseiopsis Muma, 1961
- Seta J2 usually present or, if absent, seta j5 also absent............. Phytoscutus japonicus Ehara & Kishimoto, 2007a
19. Ratio seta s4: S2 <2.7:1................................................. Transeius Chant & McMurtry, 2004
- Ratio seta s4: S2> 3:1........................................................... Amblyseius Berlese, 1914
20. Chelicerae normal in size and shape, with teeth evenly distributed along fixed digit; peritremes usually extending to level of seta j1............................................ Amblydromalus limonicus (Garman & McGregor, 1956)
- Chelicerae reduced in size, with a group of teeth clustered at distal end of fixed digit; peritremes usually not extending beyond setae j3................................................................................... 21
21. Ventrianal shield divided into separate ventral and anal shields................. Iphiseius degenerans (Berlese, 1889)
- Ventrianal shield entire........................................................... Euseius Wainstein, 1962
Notes
Files
Files
(7.9 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:a3d057b9708c45ecc2c92de8f1773037
|
7.9 kB | Download |
System files
(41.7 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:6d93707d935f5dd28721cb56ac0a8d8e
|
41.7 kB | Download |
Linked records
Additional details
Identifiers
Related works
- Is part of
- Journal article: 10.11646/zootaxa.5782.1.3 (DOI)
- Journal article: http://zenodo.org/record/19181174 (URL)
- Journal article: http://publication.plazi.org/id/FFB9A24294260F2AFFB0D777FFD1FFF3 (URL)
- Journal article: http://zoobank.org/15A49547-12B1-497D-A792-7E6532F2BB2E (URL)
- Is source of
- https://biodiversitypmc.sibils.org/collections/plazi/0380DA3A94310F32FF27D29AFA4DFAFB (URL)
Biodiversity
- Scientific name authorship
- Berlese
- Kingdom
- Animalia
- Phylum
- Arthropoda
- Order
- Mesostigmata
- Family
- Phytoseiidae
- Taxon rank
- family
- Taxonomic concept label
- Phytoseiidae Berlese, 1916 sec. Negm, Toyoshima, Kishimoto & Amano, 2026
References
- Muma, M. H. (1961) Subfamilies, genera and species of Phytoseiidae (Acarina: Mesostigmata). Bulletin of the Florida State Museum, 5, 267-302. https://doi.org/10.58782/flmnh.tqpo4380
- Berlese, A. (1913) Acaroteca Italica. Tipografia di M. Ricci, Firenze, 221 pp.
- Ribaga, C. (1904) (1902) Gamasidi planticoli. Rivista di Patologia Vegetale, 10, 175-178.
- Scheuten, A. (1857) Einiges uber Milben. Archiv fur Naturgeschichte, 23, 104-112.
- Chant, D. A. & McMurtry, J. A. (1994) A review of the subfamilies Phytoseiinae and Typhlodrominae (Acari: Phytoseiidae). International Journal of Acarology, 20, 223-310. https://doi.org/10.1080/01647959408684022
- Chant, D. A. (1959) Phytoseiid mites (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Part I. Bionomics of seven species in southern England. Part II. A taxonomic review of the family Phytoseiidae, with descriptions of 38 new species. The Canadian Entomologist, 91, 1-166.
- Wainstein, B. A. (1976) A new tribe of the family Phytoseiidae (Parasitiformes). Zoologicheskii Zhurnal, 55, 696-700.
- Wainstein, B. A. (1962) Revision du genre Typhlodromus Scheuten, 1857 et systematique de la famille des Phytoseiidae (Berlese, 1916) (Acarina: Parasitiformes). Acarologia, 14, 5-30.
- Nesbitt, H. (1951) A taxonomic study of the Phytoseiinae (Family Laelaptidae) predacious upon Tetranychidae of economic importance. Zoologische Verhandelingen, 12, 1-64.
- Garman, P. (1948) Mite species from apple trees in Connecticut. Bulletin of the Connecticut Agricultural Experimental Station, 520, 5-27.
- Ehara, S. & Hamaoka, K. (1980) A new Typhlodromus from Japan with notes on four other species of phytoseiid mites. Acta Arachnologica, 29, 3-8. https://doi.org/10.2476/asjaa.29.3
- Ehara, S. & Amano, H. (1998) A revision of the mite family Phytoseiidae in Japan (Acari: Gamasina), with remarks on its biology. Species Diversity, 3, 25-73. https://doi.org/10.12782/specdiv.3.25
- Chant, D. A. & McMurtry, J. A. (2005 a) A review of the subfamily Amblyseiinae Muma (Acari; Phytoseiidae): Part VI. The tribe Euseiini n. tribe, subtribes Typhlodromalina n. subtribe, Euseiini n. subtribe, and Ricoseiina n subtribe. International Journal of Acarology, 31, 187-224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01647950508684424
- Chant, D. A. & McMurtry, J. A. (2003 a) A review of the subfamily Amblyseiinae Muma (Acari: Phytoseiidae): Part I. Neoseiulini new tribe. International Journal of Acarology, 29, 3-46. https://doi.org/10.1080/01647950308684319
- Hughes, A. M. (1948) The mites associated with stored food products. Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, H. M. Stationary Office, London, 168 pp.
- Chant, D. A. & McMurtry, J. A. (2005 b) A review of the subfamily Amblyseiinae Muma (Acari: Phytoseiidae): Part VII. Typhlodromipsini n. tribe. International Journal of Acarology, 31, 315-340. https://doi.org/10.1080/01647950508683673
- De Leon, D. (1965) A note on Neoseiulus Hughes 1948 and a new synonymy. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington, 87, 23.
- Karg, W. & Oomen-Kalsbeek, F. (1987) Neue Raubmilbenarten der Gattung Amblyseius Berlese (Acarina, Parasitiformes, Phytoseiidae) - Antagonisten der unechten Spinnmilbe Brevipalpus phoenicis Geijskes. Zoologische Jahrbucher Systematik, 114, 131-140.
- Kolodochka, L. A. (1998) Two new tribes and the main results of a revision of Palearctic phytoseiid mites (Parasitiformes, Phytoseiidae) with the family system concept. Vestnik Zoologii, 32, 51-63. [in Russian]
- Chant, D. A. & McMurtry, J. A. (2006) A review of the subfamily Amblyseiinae Muma (Acari: Phytoseiidae): Part VIII. The tribes Macroseiini Chant, Denmark and Baker, Phytoseiulini n. tribe, Afroseiulini n. tribe and Indoseiulini Ehara & Amano. International Journal of Acarology, 32, 13-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/01647950608684439
- Athias-Henriot, C. (1957) Phytoseiidae et Aceosejidae (Acarina: Gamasina) d'Algerie. I. Genres Blattisocius Keegan, Iphiseius, Berlese, Amblyseius Berlese, Phytoseius Ribaga, Phytoseiulus Evans. Bulletin de la Societe d'Histore Natrelle de l'Afrique du Nord, 48, 319-352.
- Ehara, S. (1967 a) Phytoseiid mites from Hokkaido (Acarina: Mesostigmata). Journal of the Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University, Series VI, Zoology, 16, 212-233.
- Swirski, E. & Schechter, R. (1961) Some Phytoseiid mites (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) of Hong Kong, with a description of a new genus and seven new species. Israel Journal of Agricultural Research, 11, 97-117.
- Ehara, S. & Kishimoto, H. (2007 a) Description of a new species of Phytoscutus (Acari: Phytoseiidae) from Kyushu, Japan. International Journal of Acarology, 33, 111-113. https://doi.org/10.1080/01647950708684509
- Chant, D. A. & McMurtry, J. A. (2004) A review of the subfamily Amblyseiinae Muma (Acari: Phytoseiidae): Part III. The tribe Amblyseiini Wainstein, subtribe Amblyseiina n. subtribe. International Journal of Acarology, 30, 171-228. https://doi.org/10.1080/01647950408684388
- Berlese, A. (1914) Acari nuovi. Manipulus IX. Redia, 10, 113-150.
- Garman, P. & McGregor, E. A. (1956) Four new predaceous mites (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Southern California Academy of Science Bulletin, 55, 7-13.
- Berlese, A. (1889) Acari, Myriapoda et Scorpiones hucusque in Italia seperta. Tipografia del Seminario, Padova, 4 pls. [pls. 6 + 7-9]