Mechanical Properties of Polystyrene Modified Asphalt Concrete Mixes from Single Face Compaction for Predicted Double face Compaction
Authors/Creators
Description
Mechanistic design of asphalt pavements necessitates initial material characterization of asphalt mix properties, employing various methods such as the Marshal Design and Hveem methods for mix design properties. This study utilized the Marshal Design method and indirect tensile test method to assess the mechanical properties of polystyrene modified hot mix asphalt concrete for both single face compaction and double face compaction under heavy traffic conditions. The research addresses key issues such as simulating actual field conditions with single face compaction, aimed at reducing wear on compaction machines and minimizing manual effort during laboratory testing. Preparation involved creating both unmodified and polystyrene modified asphalt concrete mixes for both compaction types. Findings indicate optimal performance with a 20% polystyrene addition across both compaction methods, with most properties meeting required standards. Laboratory-tested properties such as tensile strength, tensile strain, compressive strength and compressive strain were compared for the double face compaction from single face compaction results.
Files
(37-47)Mechanical Properties of Polystyrene Modified Asphalt.pdf
Additional details
References
- 1. Brown, E. R., & Foo, K. Y. (1989). Evaluation of variability in resilient modulus test results (Report No. 91-6). National Center for Asphalt Technology.
- 2. Heukelom, W., & Klomp, A. J. (1982). Dynamic testing as a means of controlling pavements during and after construction. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on the Structural Design of Asphalt Pavements (PR 24).
- 3. Emesiobi, F. C. (2000). Testing and quality control of materials in civil and highway engineering (pp. 233–238). Goodnews Printing Press.
- 4. Schapery, R. A., Park, S. W., & Kim, Y. R. (1996). A viscoelastic continuum damage model and its application to uniaxial behavior of asphalt concrete. Journal of Mechanics and Materials, 24(4), 241–255.
- 5. Pellinen, T. K., & Witczak, M. W. (2002). Use of stiffness of hot-mix asphalt as a simple performance test. In Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.
- 6. Clyne, T. R., Li, X., Marasteanu, M. O., & Skok, E. L. (2003). Dynamic and resilient modulus of Mn/DOT asphalt mixtures (Final report). University of Minnesota, Department of Civil Engineering.
- 7. Garcia, G., & Thompson, M. R. (2007). HMA dynamic modulus predictive models: A review (Report No. FHWA-ICT-07-005).
- 8. Oguara, T. M. (2019). Highway engineering: Pavement design, construction and maintenance (2nd ed., pp. 219–229). University of Port Harcourt Press.
- 9. Asphalt Institute. (1997). Mix design methods for asphalt (6th ed., MS-02).
- 10. Kassem, E., Scullion, T., Masad, E., & Chowdhury, A. (2012). Comprehensive evaluation of compaction of asphalt pavements and a practical approach for density prediction. Transportation Research Record, 2268, 98–107.