Published April 12, 2026 | Version v1

Does Options Open Interest Pin the Underlying? Five Tests on 2,294 Trading Days

Authors/Creators

Description

Prior work has established that options open interest can either pin or amplify underlying
price movement near expiration, depending on the sign of aggregate dealer gamma exposure
(Avellaneda & Lipkin 2003; Jeannin et al. 2008; Barbon & Buraschi 2021). Golez & Jackwerth
(2012) documented pinning in S&P 500 futures through 2009. We extend their analysis to
2016–2025, a period marked by the proliferation of weekly and zero-days-to-expiration (0DTE)
options, using 1.6 million near-expiry SPY options records matched with E-mini S&P 500 futures
at one-minute resolution across 2,294 trading days. Five tests find no evidence of pinning in this
modern sample. The single statistically significant result (p < 0.001) shows that days with the
highest ATM open interest exhibit 16% wider daily ranges than days with the lowest—consistent
with the gamma amplification mechanism described by Barbon & Buraschi (2021) rather than
the pinning documented in earlier periods. These results suggest that S&P 500 expiration
dynamics may have shifted from a pinning regime to an amplification regime, potentially driven
by structural changes in dealer positioning associated with short-dated options growth. This
investigation was prompted by a structural profiling tool (Database Whisper) that identified
open interest as more structurally informative than implied volatility in options data.

Files

Does_Options_Open_Interest_Pin_the_Underlying__Five_Tests_on_2_294_Trading_Days.pdf

Files (157.4 kB)